Consequences of nuclear accidents for biodiversity and ecosystem services

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Authors

Nuclear energy is a potential solution to electricity demand but also entails risks.
Policy debates on nuclear accidents have focused primarily on negative impacts on humans. Although such impacts are important, we argue that policy debates must also consider the consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem services. We
reviewed 521 studies conducted after the Chernobyl accident, the most severe
nuclear accident in history. Elevated radiation levels have been recorded among a
diversity of species, even up to thousands of kilometers away from the meltdown site, and after more than two decades following the accident. Close to the reactor, physiological and morphological changes have occurred. Negative effects on ecosystem services have been observed, including the contamination of water, soils, and wild food supplies. Informed policy decisions on nuclear energy require a greater understanding of the consequences of accidents, including effects on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Based on our review, we recommend to (1) fully incorporate risks for biodiversity and ecosystem services into policy debates; (2) develop a coherent information chain regarding such risks; (3) use proactive planning strategies to be prepared for potential accidents, and (4) develop a coherent research agenda on the consequences of nuclear accidents for biodiversity and ecosystem services.
Original languageEnglish
JournalConservation Letters
Volume5
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)81-89
Number of pages9
ISSN1755-263X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.04.2012

Bibliographical note

FP7: 265104

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Backstage: Organizing Events as Proto-Institutional Work in the Popular Music Industry
  2. Nanofibers obtained with electrospinning of polyethylene oxide with different solvents
  3. Nachhaltigkeitsmarketing
  4. Christopher H. Achen / Larry M. Bartels: Democracy for Realists. Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government, Princeton: Princeton University Press 2017
  5. Institutional entrepreneurship for responsible digital innovation
  6. In silico toxicology protocols
  7. Use your power for good: plural valuation of nature – the Oaxaca statement
  8. The cost of depression
  9. Introduction
  10. Summer temperatures from the Middle Pleistocene site Schöningen 13 II, northern Germany, determined from subfossil chironomid assemblages
  11. Erforschung multidiskursiver Organisationen
  12. Freie Berufe im Wandel der Arbeitsmärkte
  13. Institutional ownership and board governance. A structured literature review on the heterogeneous monitoring role of institutional investors
  14. CSR, moral licensing and organizational misconduct
  15. Stille, Geräusch, Rauschen
  16. The art of crowdfunding arts and innovation
  17. Analyse divergenten Nutzerverhaltens in kollaborativen Tagging-Systemen
  18. Syntaxbasierte Großschreibung von Anfang an?!
  19. The case for risk-based premiums in public health insurance
  20. Challenges in contrast
  21. Action, Adventure, Desire
  22. Hypothesenprüfung, Theorieentwicklung und Erkenntnisfortschritt in der Mathematikdidaktik
  23. Zukünftige Generationen in der heutigen Demokratie
  24. Schulleitungsmonitor Schweiz 2021 - Kurzbericht
  25. Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany
  26. Social assessment and management of conflict minerals
  27. Positive Empathy and Prosocial Behavior
  28. Konstanz im Wandel?
  29. Deficits in Emotion-Regulation Skills Predict Alcohol Use During and After Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol Dependence
  30. A Research Note on Age Discrimination and the Desire to Retire