Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research. / Altschul, Drew; Beran, Michael J.; Bohn, Manuel et al.
In: Japanese Psychological Review, Vol. 62, No. 3, 31.10.2019, p. 205-220.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Altschul, D, Beran, MJ, Bohn, M, Caspar, K, Fichtel, C, Försterling, M, Grebe, N, Hernandez-Aguilar, RA, Rodrigo, AM, Proctor, D, Sanchez-Amaro, A, Szabelska, A, Taylor, D, van der Mescht, J, Völter, C, Watzek, J, Simpson, E & Kwok, SC 2019, 'Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research', Japanese Psychological Review, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 205-220. https://doi.org/10.24602/sjpr.62.3_205

APA

Altschul, D., Beran, M. J., Bohn, M., Caspar, K., Fichtel, C., Försterling, M., Grebe, N., Hernandez-Aguilar, R. A., Rodrigo, A. M., Proctor, D., Sanchez-Amaro, A., Szabelska, A., Taylor, D., van der Mescht, J., Völter, C., Watzek, J., Simpson, E., & Kwok, S. C. (2019). Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research. Japanese Psychological Review, 62(3), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.24602/sjpr.62.3_205

Vancouver

Altschul D, Beran MJ, Bohn M, Caspar K, Fichtel C, Försterling M et al. Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research. Japanese Psychological Review. 2019 Oct 31;62(3):205-220. doi: 10.24602/sjpr.62.3_205

Bibtex

@article{2fb772ba8ebe40d48f0204972309954e,
title = "Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research",
abstract = "The field of primate cognition studies how primates, including humans, perceive, process, store, retrieve, and use information to guide decision making and other behavior. Much of this research is motivated by a desire to understand how these abilities evolved. Large and diverse samples from a wide range of species are vital to achieving this goal. In reality, however, primate cognition research suffers from small sample sizes and is often limited to a handful of species, which constrains the evolutionary inferences we can draw. We conducted a systematic review of primate cognition research published between 2014 and 2019 to quantify the extent of this problem. Across 574 studies, the median sample size was 7 individuals. Less than 15% of primate species were studied at all, and only 19% of studies included more than one species. Further, the species that were studied varied widely in how much research attention they received, partly because a small number of test sites contributed most of the studies. These results suggest that the generalizability of primate cognition studies may be severely limited. Publication bias, questionable research practices, and a lack of replication attempts may exacerbate these problems. We describe the ManyPrimates project as one approach to overcoming some of these issues by establishing an infrastructure for large-scale collaboration in primate cognition research. Building on similar initiatives in other areas of psychology, this approach has already yielded one of the largest and most diverse primate samples to date and enables us to ask many research questions that can only be addressed through collaboration.",
keywords = "Psychology",
author = "Drew Altschul and Beran, {Michael J.} and Manuel Bohn and Kai Caspar and Claudia Fichtel and Marlene F{\"o}rsterling and Nicholas Grebe and Hernandez-Aguilar, {R. Adriana} and Rodrigo, {Alba Motes} and Darby Proctor and Alejandro Sanchez-Amaro and Anna Szabelska and Derry Taylor and {van der Mescht}, Jol{\'e}ne and Christoph V{\"o}lter and Julia Watzek and Elizabeth Simpson and Kwok, {Sze Chai}",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.24602/sjpr.62.3_205",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "205--220",
journal = "Japanese Psychological Review",
issn = "2433-4650",
publisher = "Society of Japanese Psychological Review ",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research

AU - Altschul, Drew

AU - Beran, Michael J.

AU - Bohn, Manuel

AU - Caspar, Kai

AU - Fichtel, Claudia

AU - Försterling, Marlene

AU - Grebe, Nicholas

AU - Hernandez-Aguilar, R. Adriana

AU - Rodrigo, Alba Motes

AU - Proctor, Darby

AU - Sanchez-Amaro, Alejandro

AU - Szabelska, Anna

AU - Taylor, Derry

AU - van der Mescht, Joléne

AU - Völter, Christoph

AU - Watzek, Julia

AU - Simpson, Elizabeth

AU - Kwok, Sze Chai

PY - 2019/10/31

Y1 - 2019/10/31

N2 - The field of primate cognition studies how primates, including humans, perceive, process, store, retrieve, and use information to guide decision making and other behavior. Much of this research is motivated by a desire to understand how these abilities evolved. Large and diverse samples from a wide range of species are vital to achieving this goal. In reality, however, primate cognition research suffers from small sample sizes and is often limited to a handful of species, which constrains the evolutionary inferences we can draw. We conducted a systematic review of primate cognition research published between 2014 and 2019 to quantify the extent of this problem. Across 574 studies, the median sample size was 7 individuals. Less than 15% of primate species were studied at all, and only 19% of studies included more than one species. Further, the species that were studied varied widely in how much research attention they received, partly because a small number of test sites contributed most of the studies. These results suggest that the generalizability of primate cognition studies may be severely limited. Publication bias, questionable research practices, and a lack of replication attempts may exacerbate these problems. We describe the ManyPrimates project as one approach to overcoming some of these issues by establishing an infrastructure for large-scale collaboration in primate cognition research. Building on similar initiatives in other areas of psychology, this approach has already yielded one of the largest and most diverse primate samples to date and enables us to ask many research questions that can only be addressed through collaboration.

AB - The field of primate cognition studies how primates, including humans, perceive, process, store, retrieve, and use information to guide decision making and other behavior. Much of this research is motivated by a desire to understand how these abilities evolved. Large and diverse samples from a wide range of species are vital to achieving this goal. In reality, however, primate cognition research suffers from small sample sizes and is often limited to a handful of species, which constrains the evolutionary inferences we can draw. We conducted a systematic review of primate cognition research published between 2014 and 2019 to quantify the extent of this problem. Across 574 studies, the median sample size was 7 individuals. Less than 15% of primate species were studied at all, and only 19% of studies included more than one species. Further, the species that were studied varied widely in how much research attention they received, partly because a small number of test sites contributed most of the studies. These results suggest that the generalizability of primate cognition studies may be severely limited. Publication bias, questionable research practices, and a lack of replication attempts may exacerbate these problems. We describe the ManyPrimates project as one approach to overcoming some of these issues by establishing an infrastructure for large-scale collaboration in primate cognition research. Building on similar initiatives in other areas of psychology, this approach has already yielded one of the largest and most diverse primate samples to date and enables us to ask many research questions that can only be addressed through collaboration.

KW - Psychology

U2 - 10.24602/sjpr.62.3_205

DO - 10.24602/sjpr.62.3_205

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 62

SP - 205

EP - 220

JO - Japanese Psychological Review

JF - Japanese Psychological Review

SN - 2433-4650

IS - 3

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Professional Development Workshop on “What Were You Thinking: Developing Cognitive Sensibilities for Inductive Coding” with Arne Carlsen, Martha Feldman, Claus Rerup, Heather Vogue, and Kristina Workman
  2. Make academia meaningful again: A conversation on research, cocreation and impact
  3. Information, not Representation: Crowdworker Participation on Digital Work Platforms
  4. 37th EGOS Colloquium - EGOS 2021
  5. From Fleeting Enchantment to Embodied Commitment: How Bottom-up Momentum can Emerge and Persist
  6. Introduction to the Special Issue "Understanding the Platform Economy"
  7. Performance under Climatic Conditions
  8. Can we solve the climate crisis? Contributions from artS, technology and science
  9. "Listen I‘m sorry. I didn‘t mean to offend you.": Conventions of language use across the Englishes (Universität Erfurt)
  10. Panel session on “The grand challenges of the 21st century”
  11. Tolerating and inducing temporal asynchronicity in complex innovation journeys
  12. Grand challenges, organized creativity and inter-organizational relationships
  13. Panel session on “Strategy Communications: Talk and Text” with Andreas König, Eero Vaara, Freek Vermeulen, and Basak Yakis-Douglas
  14. Purpuseful Work Symposium
  15. Standards for Inclusion & ICT Readiness: Ensuring Inclusiveness and Connectivity for Older Persons
  16. Reviewing for the Academy of Management Conference (ODC)
  17. Panel Moderation “Decolonizing Classical Music?! Musicians from the Global South on the European Stage”
  18. Virtual Doctoral-Postdoctoral Seminar on Social-Symbolic Work
  19. Digital Capitalism Without Firms? Consequences for the Organization and Regulation of Work from an Employment Systems Perspective
  20. 37th EGOS Colloquium - EGOS 2021
  21. Startup Booster (Externe Organisation)
  22. Charline Monin
  23. International Research in Children's Literature (Zeitschrift)
  24. Institut für Management und Organisation (Organisation)
  25. Fostering Consumer Trust in the Sharing Economy – Exploring Ridesharing in Europe
  26. Organizing in Times of Crisis: Neue Lehrformate für und in Krisenzeiten
  27. Fakultät Management und Technologie (Organisation)
  28. Rehabilitating the Sharing Economy
  29. Labour Governance Systems in Garment Global Supply Chains Since Rana Plaza: Effects and Potentialities
  30. Zweitgutachten für Dissertation Mario Steppe
  31. Ansätze zur Regulierung in globalen Lieferketten. Von Codes of Conduct über kollektive Abkommen zu Lieferkettengesetzen
  32. Internationales Symposium 'Johanna Sypri und ihr Werk' 2001
  33. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society (Fachzeitschrift)
  34. L'art queer du convivialisme et la complexité comme expérience: La culture comme transformation dans les espaces de possibilité urbains
  35. Academy of Management Journal (Fachzeitschrift)
  36. Conference- Strategic Management Society 41th Annual International Conference: Imagination and Inspiration