Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research. / Altschul, Drew; Beran, Michael J.; Bohn, Manuel et al.
In: Japanese Psychological Review, Vol. 62, No. 3, 31.10.2019, p. 205-220.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Altschul, D, Beran, MJ, Bohn, M, Caspar, K, Fichtel, C, Försterling, M, Grebe, N, Hernandez-Aguilar, RA, Rodrigo, AM, Proctor, D, Sanchez-Amaro, A, Szabelska, A, Taylor, D, van der Mescht, J, Völter, C, Watzek, J, Simpson, E & Kwok, SC 2019, 'Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research', Japanese Psychological Review, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 205-220. https://doi.org/10.24602/sjpr.62.3_205

APA

Altschul, D., Beran, M. J., Bohn, M., Caspar, K., Fichtel, C., Försterling, M., Grebe, N., Hernandez-Aguilar, R. A., Rodrigo, A. M., Proctor, D., Sanchez-Amaro, A., Szabelska, A., Taylor, D., van der Mescht, J., Völter, C., Watzek, J., Simpson, E., & Kwok, S. C. (2019). Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research. Japanese Psychological Review, 62(3), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.24602/sjpr.62.3_205

Vancouver

Altschul D, Beran MJ, Bohn M, Caspar K, Fichtel C, Försterling M et al. Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research. Japanese Psychological Review. 2019 Oct 31;62(3):205-220. doi: 10.24602/sjpr.62.3_205

Bibtex

@article{2fb772ba8ebe40d48f0204972309954e,
title = "Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research",
abstract = "The field of primate cognition studies how primates, including humans, perceive, process, store, retrieve, and use information to guide decision making and other behavior. Much of this research is motivated by a desire to understand how these abilities evolved. Large and diverse samples from a wide range of species are vital to achieving this goal. In reality, however, primate cognition research suffers from small sample sizes and is often limited to a handful of species, which constrains the evolutionary inferences we can draw. We conducted a systematic review of primate cognition research published between 2014 and 2019 to quantify the extent of this problem. Across 574 studies, the median sample size was 7 individuals. Less than 15% of primate species were studied at all, and only 19% of studies included more than one species. Further, the species that were studied varied widely in how much research attention they received, partly because a small number of test sites contributed most of the studies. These results suggest that the generalizability of primate cognition studies may be severely limited. Publication bias, questionable research practices, and a lack of replication attempts may exacerbate these problems. We describe the ManyPrimates project as one approach to overcoming some of these issues by establishing an infrastructure for large-scale collaboration in primate cognition research. Building on similar initiatives in other areas of psychology, this approach has already yielded one of the largest and most diverse primate samples to date and enables us to ask many research questions that can only be addressed through collaboration.",
keywords = "Psychology",
author = "Drew Altschul and Beran, {Michael J.} and Manuel Bohn and Kai Caspar and Claudia Fichtel and Marlene F{\"o}rsterling and Nicholas Grebe and Hernandez-Aguilar, {R. Adriana} and Rodrigo, {Alba Motes} and Darby Proctor and Alejandro Sanchez-Amaro and Anna Szabelska and Derry Taylor and {van der Mescht}, Jol{\'e}ne and Christoph V{\"o}lter and Julia Watzek and Elizabeth Simpson and Kwok, {Sze Chai}",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.24602/sjpr.62.3_205",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "205--220",
journal = "Japanese Psychological Review",
issn = "2433-4650",
publisher = "Society of Japanese Psychological Review ",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research

AU - Altschul, Drew

AU - Beran, Michael J.

AU - Bohn, Manuel

AU - Caspar, Kai

AU - Fichtel, Claudia

AU - Försterling, Marlene

AU - Grebe, Nicholas

AU - Hernandez-Aguilar, R. Adriana

AU - Rodrigo, Alba Motes

AU - Proctor, Darby

AU - Sanchez-Amaro, Alejandro

AU - Szabelska, Anna

AU - Taylor, Derry

AU - van der Mescht, Joléne

AU - Völter, Christoph

AU - Watzek, Julia

AU - Simpson, Elizabeth

AU - Kwok, Sze Chai

PY - 2019/10/31

Y1 - 2019/10/31

N2 - The field of primate cognition studies how primates, including humans, perceive, process, store, retrieve, and use information to guide decision making and other behavior. Much of this research is motivated by a desire to understand how these abilities evolved. Large and diverse samples from a wide range of species are vital to achieving this goal. In reality, however, primate cognition research suffers from small sample sizes and is often limited to a handful of species, which constrains the evolutionary inferences we can draw. We conducted a systematic review of primate cognition research published between 2014 and 2019 to quantify the extent of this problem. Across 574 studies, the median sample size was 7 individuals. Less than 15% of primate species were studied at all, and only 19% of studies included more than one species. Further, the species that were studied varied widely in how much research attention they received, partly because a small number of test sites contributed most of the studies. These results suggest that the generalizability of primate cognition studies may be severely limited. Publication bias, questionable research practices, and a lack of replication attempts may exacerbate these problems. We describe the ManyPrimates project as one approach to overcoming some of these issues by establishing an infrastructure for large-scale collaboration in primate cognition research. Building on similar initiatives in other areas of psychology, this approach has already yielded one of the largest and most diverse primate samples to date and enables us to ask many research questions that can only be addressed through collaboration.

AB - The field of primate cognition studies how primates, including humans, perceive, process, store, retrieve, and use information to guide decision making and other behavior. Much of this research is motivated by a desire to understand how these abilities evolved. Large and diverse samples from a wide range of species are vital to achieving this goal. In reality, however, primate cognition research suffers from small sample sizes and is often limited to a handful of species, which constrains the evolutionary inferences we can draw. We conducted a systematic review of primate cognition research published between 2014 and 2019 to quantify the extent of this problem. Across 574 studies, the median sample size was 7 individuals. Less than 15% of primate species were studied at all, and only 19% of studies included more than one species. Further, the species that were studied varied widely in how much research attention they received, partly because a small number of test sites contributed most of the studies. These results suggest that the generalizability of primate cognition studies may be severely limited. Publication bias, questionable research practices, and a lack of replication attempts may exacerbate these problems. We describe the ManyPrimates project as one approach to overcoming some of these issues by establishing an infrastructure for large-scale collaboration in primate cognition research. Building on similar initiatives in other areas of psychology, this approach has already yielded one of the largest and most diverse primate samples to date and enables us to ask many research questions that can only be addressed through collaboration.

KW - Psychology

U2 - 10.24602/sjpr.62.3_205

DO - 10.24602/sjpr.62.3_205

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 62

SP - 205

EP - 220

JO - Japanese Psychological Review

JF - Japanese Psychological Review

SN - 2433-4650

IS - 3

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Portuguese part-of-speech tagging with large margin structure learning
  2. AUC Maximizing Support Vector Learning
  3. Analysis of the construction of an autonomous robot to improve its energy efficiency when traveling through irregular terrain
  4. Artificial intelligence in songwriting and composing - perspectives and challenges in creative practices
  5. How to support teachers to give feedback to modelling tasks effectively? Results from a teacher-training-study in the Co²CA project
  6. Sliding Mode Control of an Inductive Power Transmission System with Maximum Efficiency
  7. Robustness of coherent sets computations
  8. Deeper Insights into Different Consumer Perceptions of CSR Communication
  9. Legitimation problems of participatory processes in technology assessment and technology policy
  10. Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research
  11. Joint Proceedings of Scholarly QALD 2023 and SemREC 2023 co-located with 22nd International Semantic Web Conference ISWC 2023
  12. Expectations on Hierarchical Scales of Discourse
  13. Effect of yttrium addition on lattice parameter, Young's modulus and vacancy of magnesium
  14. Othering Space
  15. "And I Think That Is a Very Straightforward Way of Dealing With It''
  16. Self-perceived quality of life predicts mortality risk better than a multi-biomarker panel, but the combination of both does best
  17. What´s in a net? or: The end of the average
  18. Introduction to Philosophy of Management
  19. Lessons from modeling 100% renewable scenarios using GENeSYS-MOD
  20. Res Lunae: Characterizing Diverse Lunar Resource Systems Using the Social-Ecological System Framework
  21. Continental mapping of forest ecosystem functions reveals a high but unrealised potential for forest multifunctionality.
  22. Continued logarithm representation of real numbers
  23. Root-root interactions: extending our perspective to be more inclusive of the range of theories in ecology and agriculture using in-vivo analyses
  24. Sprachen in Liechtenstein