Collaboration or fragmentation? Biodiversity management through the common agricultural policy

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

We argue that the current system of agri-environment management in the European Common Agricultural Policy is ineffective at conserving biodiversity in part because it promotes fragmentation instead of collaboration of actors, thus hindering coordinated biodiversity management. Actor fragmentation is reinforced by the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in three ways: (1) through targeting individual farmers; (2) by creating confusion around coordination roles for increasing numbers of actors; and (3) by failing to engage with barriers to collaboration among farmers. Our findings draw on empirical evidence collected through multi-stakeholder workshops in Germany and Sweden. Our argument adds a different dimension to accepted explanations for the ineffectiveness of CAP for biodiversity management. Traditionally, explanations have focussed on low levels of farmer uptake of relevant measures, or the lack of ecological knowledge informing such measures. The level of actor fragmentation identified here suggests that a fundamental rethink of farmland biodiversity management is needed. We propose a new research agenda to identify more effective governance approaches
Original languageEnglish
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume64
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
ISSN0264-8377
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.05.2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd

    Research areas

  • Sustainability Science - Agri-environment schemes, Conservation, Ecosystem services, European Union, Social network analysis, Social-ecological systems

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Erratum zu
  2. Chapter 9: Particular Remedies for Non-performance: Section 5: Damages and Interest
  3. Digital Classroom
  4. Entry, Exit and Productivity
  5. Introduction
  6. Ergebnisse einer Sparkassen-Umfrage
  7. Strategic Spatial Planning
  8. “Greedy Buyers, Amoral Speculators and Lacking State Control”
  9. Estimation of the cancer risk to humans resulting from the presence of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide in surface water
  10. A multivariate, multilevel analysis of the relationship between cognitive abilities and scholastic achievement
  11. Impact of high carbon amendments and pre-crops on soil bacterial communities
  12. Development of a cycling anger scale
  13. One-year follow-up results of unsupported online computerized cognitive behavioural therapy for depression in primary care
  14. The research potential of new types of enterprise data based on surveys from official statistics in Germany
  15. Foucault, Reader and Critic of Marx
  16. QUANT - Question Answering Benchmark Curator
  17. VIPs in der Lesesozialisation ?
  18. Unplanned, Unanticipated and Unsupported?
  19. Testing the limits of jurisdiction in investor-state arbitration in svalbard’s waters
  20. The EU at a crossroads. Negotiations about the multiannual financial framework 2021-2027
  21. Correction to
  22. A Soft Piezo Mechanical Hydraulic Actuator with its Liquid Stiffness Identification and its Control
  23. Development of a magnesium recycling alloy based on the AM alloy system
  24. Digital Games and Fan-Discourse
  25. Demand Chain Management
  26. Medial erzeugte Befindlichkeiten
  27. Deformation Mechanisms and Formability Window for As-Cast Mg-6Al-2Ca-1Sn-0.3Sr Alloy (MRI 230D)
  28. Effectiveness and Moderators of an Internet-Based Mobile-Supported Stress Management Intervention as a Universal Prevention Approach