Provisions for nullification of conservation and management measures in RFMO objection procedures

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

In order to successfully exercise their mandate to adopt binding conservation and management measures (CMMs) for straddling and highly migratory fish stocks, regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) and arrangements (RFMAs) need effective decision-making procedures. The constitutive instruments of a considerable number of such bodies contain objection procedures which allow individual members to unilaterally opt-out of an adopted CMM. Most scholars and RFMO performance review panels consider that unconstrained unilateral objection procedures undermine the decision-making procedures of both RFMOs and RFMAs. This article examines the phenomenon of CMM nullification provisions, which are present in five RFMOs. Such provisions deprive adopted CMMs of their binding force for all members if a certain number of members of the RFMO object to the CMM. This article argues that there is a case for a phase-out of CMM nullification provisions together with the unilateral objection procedures to which they are closely tied. Compared to unilateral objections more generally, CMM nullification provisions raise additional legitimacy questions given that they result in the nullification of CMMs that have been democratically adopted in conformity with the legitimate decision-making procedures of the respective RFMO. This article first provides a brief overview of the rationale for objection procedures by placing the concept of objections in the broader context of RFMO decision-making. Thereafter, this article briefly examines the requirements and legal effects of individual objections of RFMO members to CMMs. The final substantive section analyzes and compares existing CMM nullification provisions, focusing on the requirements for their activation, the nature of their legal effects and the legitimacy of such procedures considering the broader decision-making procedures of individual RFMOs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106230
JournalMarine Policy
Volume166
Number of pages10
ISSN0308-597X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.08.2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors

    Research areas

  • Conservation and management measures (CMMs), Decision-making procedures, Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC), Legal effects, Objection procedures, Regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs)
  • Law

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Introduction to the Psychology of Entrepreneurship
  2. Machine Learning-Supported Planning of Lead Times in Job Shop Manufacturing
  3. Crowdsourcing Hypothesis Tests
  4. Das Weltsystem Des Erdöls Eine theoretisch-empirische Skizze
  5. Fatigue crack propagation in AA5083 structures additively manufactured via multi-layer friction surfacing
  6. Successful Application of Adaptive Emotion Regulation Skills Predicts the Subsequent Reduction of Depressive Symptom Severity but neither the Reduction of Anxiety nor the Reduction of General Distress during the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
  7. Status and future dynamics of decentralised renewable energy niche building processes in Argentina
  8. Evaluation of revitalization policies and redevelopment strategy for residential environment in coal mining areas
  9. Atmospheric mercury over sea ice during the OASIS-2009 campaign
  10. Implementation of the location-based Game Application Nebolus to promote Health Literacy in the Community Environment. Results of a qualitative Study
  11. From farm to factory. Vertical trading and processing structures between industrial and developing countries in the international tobacco-economy
  12. BAuA-Arbeitszeitbefragung: Vergleich 2015 – 2017 – 2019
  13. Quantitative Bildtypenanalyse
  14. Quality based prevention of overweight in the school setting: the HEPS quality checklist
  15. Active suspensions decoupling by algebraic feedback
  16. Are the terms “Socio-economic status” and “Class status” a warped form of reasoning for Max Weber?
  17. Reliability, factor structure, and measurement invariance of the dominic interactive across European countries