Building capacity for the science-policy interface on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Activities, fellows, outcomes, and neglected capacity building needs

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Building capacity for the science-policy interface on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Activities, fellows, outcomes, and neglected capacity building needs. / Gustafsson, Karin M.; Díaz-Reviriego, Isabel; Turnhout, Esther.
In: Earth System Governance, Vol. 4, 100050, 01.06.2020.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{81ad41dd4c234c2482f9ad1756a92539,
title = "Building capacity for the science-policy interface on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Activities, fellows, outcomes, and neglected capacity building needs",
abstract = "Capacity building has been identified as being of importance for the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). As the IPBES is becoming an influential expert organization, it is essential to examine what capacity building means in its context, what capacities it has built, and what implications these capacities have. This study explores these issues by focusing on the IPBES's general strategy for capacity building, the IPBES's fellowship programme and to what extent there are additional capacity building needs that can be addressed. The study shows that the IPBES has focused its capacity building efforts on the science side of the science-policy interface while, thus far, it has neglected to build capacities on the policy side of the interface. The study provides insight into how capacity building for the science-policy interface sets preconditions for science-policy relations at different levels and scales within biodiversity and ecosystem services and beyond.",
keywords = "Capacity building, Early-career researchers, Empowerment, IPBES, Participation, Science-policy interface, Ecosystems Research, Biology",
author = "Gustafsson, {Karin M.} and Isabel D{\'i}az-Reviriego and Esther Turnhout",
note = "This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council Formas [2016-00545] and a Flexpool grant from the German Centre of Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) funded through the German Research Foundation [ DFG FZT 118/2–2016 ]. ",
year = "2020",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.esg.2020.100050",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "Earth System Governance",
issn = "2589-8116",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building capacity for the science-policy interface on biodiversity and ecosystem services

T2 - Activities, fellows, outcomes, and neglected capacity building needs

AU - Gustafsson, Karin M.

AU - Díaz-Reviriego, Isabel

AU - Turnhout, Esther

N1 - This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council Formas [2016-00545] and a Flexpool grant from the German Centre of Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) funded through the German Research Foundation [ DFG FZT 118/2–2016 ].

PY - 2020/6/1

Y1 - 2020/6/1

N2 - Capacity building has been identified as being of importance for the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). As the IPBES is becoming an influential expert organization, it is essential to examine what capacity building means in its context, what capacities it has built, and what implications these capacities have. This study explores these issues by focusing on the IPBES's general strategy for capacity building, the IPBES's fellowship programme and to what extent there are additional capacity building needs that can be addressed. The study shows that the IPBES has focused its capacity building efforts on the science side of the science-policy interface while, thus far, it has neglected to build capacities on the policy side of the interface. The study provides insight into how capacity building for the science-policy interface sets preconditions for science-policy relations at different levels and scales within biodiversity and ecosystem services and beyond.

AB - Capacity building has been identified as being of importance for the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). As the IPBES is becoming an influential expert organization, it is essential to examine what capacity building means in its context, what capacities it has built, and what implications these capacities have. This study explores these issues by focusing on the IPBES's general strategy for capacity building, the IPBES's fellowship programme and to what extent there are additional capacity building needs that can be addressed. The study shows that the IPBES has focused its capacity building efforts on the science side of the science-policy interface while, thus far, it has neglected to build capacities on the policy side of the interface. The study provides insight into how capacity building for the science-policy interface sets preconditions for science-policy relations at different levels and scales within biodiversity and ecosystem services and beyond.

KW - Capacity building

KW - Early-career researchers

KW - Empowerment

KW - IPBES

KW - Participation

KW - Science-policy interface

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087933184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.esg.2020.100050

DO - 10.1016/j.esg.2020.100050

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85087933184

VL - 4

JO - Earth System Governance

JF - Earth System Governance

SN - 2589-8116

M1 - 100050

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. A transfer operator based numerical investigation of coherent structures in three-dimensional Southern ocean circulation
  2. Quality and time-related indicators in inceptive plans
  3. Erkenntnistheorie
  4. Integration of risk-oriented environmental management information systems and resource planning systems
  5. Degrees of Integration
  6. From 'one right way' to 'one ruinous way'? Discursive shifts in 'There is no alternative'
  7. Developing Carbon Accounting: Between driving Carbon Reductions and Complying with a Carbon Reporting Standard
  8. Teaching the Teachers about Language Support Strategies
  9. Analysis of ammonia losses after field application of biogas slurries by an empirical model
  10. Groundwater intrusion into leaky sewer systems
  11. Effect of Sn additions on the age hardening response, microstructures and corrosion resistance of Mg-0.8Ca (wt%) alloys
  12. Sustainable Development Discourse – Challenges for Universities
  13. Incremental contribution of pollination and other ecosystem services to agricultural productivity
  14. Gender differences on general knowledge tests
  15. Interlanguage pragmatics: From use to acquisition to second language pedagogy
  16. Anstand
  17. A Sampling Framework for Uncertainty in Individual Environmental Decisions
  18. Article 15 Scope of the Law Applicable
  19. Inventory of biodegradation data of ionic liquids
  20. Communication spaces - memory spaces. Articles on transcultural encounter in Africa
  21. Active First Movers vs. Late Free-Riders? An Empirical Analysis of UN PRI Signatories' Commitment
  22. Towards an Intra- and Interorganizational Perspective
  23. Introduction: Art Alone Can Do Nothing
  24. Diversity lost
  25. Operations Management
  26. Ecosystem services values in Spain
  27. Feedback Systems
  28. 'I Cannot Overreach the Senate': Orienting to the Macro-Context of Legislative Debates of the Nigerian Senate
  29. Pragmatic Function of Twitter Handlers' Perspectives on Children Discourse in Nigeria.
  30. Antidumping
  31. Optimal grazing management rules in semi-arid rangelands with uncertain rainfall
  32. Pragmatic Competence in EIL