Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

There is a growing body of cross-country comparisons in health systems and policy research. However, there is little consensus as to how to assess its quality. This is partly due to the fact that cross-country comparison constitutes a diverse inter-disciplinary field of study, with much variation in the motives for research, foci and levels of analyses, and methodological approaches.Inspired by the views of subject area experts and using the distinction between variable-based and case-based research, we briefly review the main different types of cross-country comparisons in health systems and policy research to identify pertinent quality issues.From this, we identify the following generic quality criteria for cross-country comparisons: (1) appropriate use of theory, (2) explicit selection of comparator countries, (3) rigour of the comparative design, (4) attention to the complexity of cross-national comparison, (5) rigour of the research methods, and (6) contribution to knowledge. This list may not be exclusive though publication and discussion of the list of criteria should help raise awareness in this field of what constitutes high quality research. In turn, this should be helpful for those planning, undertaking, or commissioning cross-country comparative research.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHealth Policy
Volume112
Issue number1-2
Pages (from-to)156-162
Number of pages7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 09.2013

    Research areas

  • Economics - Case-oriented design, Comparative method, Cross-country comparisons, Health policy research, Health system research, International comparisons, Research quality criteria, Variable-oriented design
  • Health sciences

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Small Particle Size Magnesium in One-pot Grignard-Zerewitinoff-like Reactions under Mechanochemical Conditions
  2. Psychological distance modulates goal-based versus movement-based imitation
  3. Negative effects of forest gaps on dung removal in a full-factorial experiment
  4. Multiple streams, resistance and energy policy change in Paraguay (2004–2014)
  5. Front in the mouth, front in the word
  6. 'Put bluntly, you have something of a credibility problem'
  7. The knowledge transfer potential of online data pools on nature-based solutions
  8. Microstructure and mechanical properties of large-scale Mg-Gd-Y-Zn-Mn alloys prepared through semi-continuous casting
  9. Democratization
  10. From incremental to fundamental substitution in chemical alternatives assessment
  11. Mach mal: Oder Produktion ist anderswo
  12. Logistik-Controlling
  13. Sachstrukturiertes Üben
  14. The justice dimension of sustainability
  15. Grundsatzfragen und Paradoxien für die Netzwerkarbeit in BBS futur 2.0
  16. Two-pass friction stir welding of cladded API X65
  17. Instructional animation versus static pictures
  18. Revisited
  19. The classification systems of the EQ-5D, the HUI II and the SF-6D
  20. Do We Really Know The Benefit Of Machine Learning In Production Planning And Control? A Systematic Review Of Industry Case Studies
  21. Visual Accounting
  22. Concepts and Instruments for Facing the Challenges of Corporate Sustainability Management
  23. Variation revisited: A corpus analysis of offers in Irish English and British English
  24. Hamburg Maschine_revisited
  25. QALD-9-ES: A Spanish Dataset for Question Answering Systems