A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Authors

  • Mark S. Reed
  • Steven Vella
  • Edward Challies
  • Joris de Vente
  • Lynne Frewer
  • Daniela Hohenwallner-Ries
  • Tobias Huber
  • Rosmarie K. Neumann
  • Elizabeth A. Oughton
  • Julian Sidoli del Ceno
  • Hedwig van Delden

This article differentiates between descriptive and explanatory factors to develop a typology and a theory of stakeholder and public engagement. The typology describes different types of public and stakeholder engagement, and the theory comprises four factors that explain much of the variation in outcomes (for the natural environment and/or for participants) between different types of engagement. First, we use a narrative literature search to develop a new typology of stakeholder and public engagement based on agency (who initiates and leads engagement) and mode of engagement (from communication to coproduction). We then propose a theory to explain the variation in outcomes from different types of engagement: (1) a number of socioeconomic, cultural, and institutional contextual factors influence the outcomes of engagement; (2) there are a number of process design factors that can increase the likelihood that engagement leads to desired outcomes, across a wide range of sociocultural, political, economic, and biophysical contexts; (3) the effectiveness of engagement is significantly influenced by power dynamics, the values of participants, and their epistemologies, that is, the way they construct knowledge and which types of knowledge they consider valid; and (4) engagement processes work differently and can lead to different outcomes when they operate over different spatial and temporal scales. We use the theoretical framework to provide practical guidance for those designing engagement processes, arguing that a theoretically informed approach to stakeholder and public engagement has the potential to markedly improve the outcomes of environmental decision-making processes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalRestoration Ecology
Volume26
Issue numberS1
Pages (from-to)S7-S17
Number of pages11
ISSN1061-2971
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.04.2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Society for Ecological Restoration

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Fakultät Nachhaltigkeit (Organisation)
  2. Tackling micropollutant in the environment by Benign design - an important building block of sustainable chemistry and the protection of water resources
  3. d3con - 2015
  4. Theorie des Staatsstreichs
  5. Anticipating Barriers and Success: Does it Promote Creativity?
  6. Educational Change in the Global Context Conference - 2010
  7. Multiplikator*innen im Fach Mathematik 2018
  8. Kunstform (Zeitschrift)
  9. Social Network Analysis 2011
  10. Studies in Educational Evaluation (Zeitschrift)
  11. The professional identity of gameworkers revisited: A qualitative inquiry on the case study of German professionals
  12. Privatsphäre - gefangen im Netz der Koordinaten - 2009
  13. Strengthening the connections between educational and sustainability science
  14. Evaluation of a project submitted for financial support to FCT – 2022 CALL FOR R&D PROJECT GRANTS, Portugal: Frederic Dufaux (Chair)
  15. Fakultät Management und Technologie (Organisation)
  16. College (Organisation)
  17. Einkommensdynamik von Freien Berufen und Selbstständigen
  18. 6. Leuphana Konferenzwoche 2015
  19. Mitglied des wissenschaftlichen Beirats
  20. Organization Studies (Fachzeitschrift)
  21. SEM-A2 – Search Engine Marketing Account Aggregation
  22. Input: Politische Kommunikation in der Transformation?
  23. AMLE, JBR, SJM, SBUR: Meet the Editors
  24. Fish & Chips. Mediengeschichten der Swarm Intelligence zwischen Ozean und Computer
  25. Mitglied des IFIP-Beirats, Sitzung des IFIP-Beirats
  26. Queer_Un_Konferenz "Women Know Your Limits"
  27. Digitalisierung als Herausforderung
  28. Spotlight on professional development for teachers: Which teachers benefit most from a PD workshop?
  29. Graduate School (Organisation)
  30. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover (Externe Organisation)
  31. Négritude: Hausenstein and Senghor