The relevance of international restoration principles for ecosystem restoration practice in Rwanda

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

The restoration of degraded ecosystems is considered a key strategy to contribute to ecological integrity and human well-being. To support restoration practice, 10 “Principles to guide the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021–2030” were conceived through a consultative process and put forward by a group of leading international restoration actors. The extent to which these principles can inform successful restoration activities on the ground, however, remains largely unknown. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative data collection methods, we probed 32 stakeholders who plan, manage, and implement restoration in Rwanda to elicit which factors they perceive as most important for successful restoration based on the UN Decade principles. Using the Q-methodology, we discovered that participants overall agreed that the UN Decade principles are relevant to inform successful ecosystem restoration in the study area. Further, the Q-study revealed three distinct groups of stakeholders with different priorities in terms of opinions on restoration aims, stakeholder involvement, and relevant spatial scales. Based on semi-structured interviews, we identified four considerations for successful restoration that require special attention in future restoration interventions in the study area: (1) restoring historical conditions, (2) collecting baseline data, (3) increasing local communities' sense of ownership, and (4) pursuing a long-term vision for restoration activities. To address these considerations and thereby harvest the potential of ecosystem restoration to benefit both people and nature in the long run, diverse stakeholders with different priorities for restoration need to come together to discuss possible differences in their perceived priorities, perspectives, and approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere14085
JournalRestoration Ecology
Volume32
Issue number3
Number of pages11
ISSN1061-2971
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03.2024

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors thank all interviewees for their collaboration and time. The authors thank G. Kamwezi for her support during fieldwork. This research was legally and ethically approved by the National Council for Science and Technology, Rwanda, and obtained ethical clearance from the University of Rwanda. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration.

    Research areas

  • ecosystem restoration, forest landscape restoration, Q-methodology, social-ecological systems
  • Environmental planning

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Blinde Tugenden
  2. Fundamental study of multi-track friction surfacing deposits for dissimilar aluminum alloys with application to additive manufacturing
  3. What matters for work engagement?
  4. Biological measures to recover nitrogen compounds from liquid and solid streams
  5. Kollegiale Fallberatung in inklusiven Settings
  6. Evolution of Shortbreak Holidays.
  7. Challenges and opportunities for grassland restoration: A global perspective of best practices in the era of climate change
  8. Lost in translation? Tanzanian students’ views on sustainability and language, and the implications for the pledge to leave no one behind
  9. Sustainable corporate purpose and sustainable corporate governance: Integrative theoretical framework and reform recommendations
  10. Guidance for assessing interregional ecosystem service flows
  11. System- und Handlungstheorie
  12. Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning
  13. Kontextanalyse
  14. Error Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ)
  15. "The skin and fur on your shoulders"
  16. Preserving Soils for Life
  17. Democratic Stakeholder Representativeness
  18. Digital technology and global mobility
  19. Remix
  20. Gibt es Ausdrucksspuren in kindlichen Improvisationen?
  21. Supportive Mental Health Self-Monitoring among Smartphone Users with Psychological Distress
  22. Interview mit Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c. Thomas Schomerus
  23. Transitions in jobs, occupational socialization and strain
  24. Reichsstadt Frankfurt am Main
  25. Toward Learning Distributions of Distributions
  26. Examination of the Biodegradation of the Antineoplastics Cyclophosphamide and Ifosfamide with the Closed Bottle Test (OECD 301 D)
  27. Der Interne Zins
  28. Correction to
  29. Neue Hoffnung für das UGB?