A Preregistered Field Study of the Trust Inoculation Against a Negative Event Involving Geothermal Energy Systems

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

A Preregistered Field Study of the Trust Inoculation Against a Negative Event Involving Geothermal Energy Systems. / Spampatti, Tobia; Brosch, Tobias; Trutnevyte, Evelina et al.
In: Collabra: Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 1, 89755, 14.11.2023.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{431bdd3c30d845ef91dc93902536b953,
title = "A Preregistered Field Study of the Trust Inoculation Against a Negative Event Involving Geothermal Energy Systems",
abstract = "Psychological inoculations are hailed as one of the most promising evidence-based techniques to preemptively protect public support against negative information and events, especially in time-sensitive domains like climate change mitigation and energy transitions. However, field testing of these techniques is limited, and their ecological validity thus remains to be investigated. In Fall 2021, a prospecting campaign for geothermal exploration in Geneva, Switzerland deployed seismic trucks at night that created noise and seismic vibrations which could negatively affect public support for geothermal energy systems. Here, we employed a trust inoculation in a preregistered, longitudinal field study, to make the trustworthiness of the responsible utility company salient to protect public support of geothermal energy systems against this local negative event. Contrary to our expectations, we found no evidence that the event affected participants{\textquoteright} public support towards renewable energy, nor that the trust inoculation influenced said support. This could have been due to the unintended negative influence of the time delay between the delivery of the trust inoculation and the negative event, as the inoculation was more effective with the longest time delay between its delivery and the negative event, but had unintended negative consequences with the shortest delay. We conclude by placing these results in the growing psychological inoculations literature and providing recommendations for future field studies for psychological inoculations.",
keywords = "field study, geothermal energy, Inoculation theory, longitudinal study, prebunking, psychological inoculation, public acceptance, renewable energy, trust, Psychology, Management studies, Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics",
author = "Tobia Spampatti and Tobias Brosch and Evelina Trutnevyte and Hahnel, {Ulf J.J.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 University of California Press. All rights reserved.",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1525/collabra.98755",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Collabra: Psychology",
issn = "2474-7394",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Preregistered Field Study of the Trust Inoculation Against a Negative Event Involving Geothermal Energy Systems

AU - Spampatti, Tobia

AU - Brosch, Tobias

AU - Trutnevyte, Evelina

AU - Hahnel, Ulf J.J.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 University of California Press. All rights reserved.

PY - 2023/11/14

Y1 - 2023/11/14

N2 - Psychological inoculations are hailed as one of the most promising evidence-based techniques to preemptively protect public support against negative information and events, especially in time-sensitive domains like climate change mitigation and energy transitions. However, field testing of these techniques is limited, and their ecological validity thus remains to be investigated. In Fall 2021, a prospecting campaign for geothermal exploration in Geneva, Switzerland deployed seismic trucks at night that created noise and seismic vibrations which could negatively affect public support for geothermal energy systems. Here, we employed a trust inoculation in a preregistered, longitudinal field study, to make the trustworthiness of the responsible utility company salient to protect public support of geothermal energy systems against this local negative event. Contrary to our expectations, we found no evidence that the event affected participants’ public support towards renewable energy, nor that the trust inoculation influenced said support. This could have been due to the unintended negative influence of the time delay between the delivery of the trust inoculation and the negative event, as the inoculation was more effective with the longest time delay between its delivery and the negative event, but had unintended negative consequences with the shortest delay. We conclude by placing these results in the growing psychological inoculations literature and providing recommendations for future field studies for psychological inoculations.

AB - Psychological inoculations are hailed as one of the most promising evidence-based techniques to preemptively protect public support against negative information and events, especially in time-sensitive domains like climate change mitigation and energy transitions. However, field testing of these techniques is limited, and their ecological validity thus remains to be investigated. In Fall 2021, a prospecting campaign for geothermal exploration in Geneva, Switzerland deployed seismic trucks at night that created noise and seismic vibrations which could negatively affect public support for geothermal energy systems. Here, we employed a trust inoculation in a preregistered, longitudinal field study, to make the trustworthiness of the responsible utility company salient to protect public support of geothermal energy systems against this local negative event. Contrary to our expectations, we found no evidence that the event affected participants’ public support towards renewable energy, nor that the trust inoculation influenced said support. This could have been due to the unintended negative influence of the time delay between the delivery of the trust inoculation and the negative event, as the inoculation was more effective with the longest time delay between its delivery and the negative event, but had unintended negative consequences with the shortest delay. We conclude by placing these results in the growing psychological inoculations literature and providing recommendations for future field studies for psychological inoculations.

KW - field study

KW - geothermal energy

KW - Inoculation theory

KW - longitudinal study

KW - prebunking

KW - psychological inoculation

KW - public acceptance

KW - renewable energy

KW - trust

KW - Psychology

KW - Management studies

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180291840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/collabra.98755

DO - 10.1525/collabra.98755

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85180291840

VL - 9

JO - Collabra: Psychology

JF - Collabra: Psychology

SN - 2474-7394

IS - 1

M1 - 89755

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. "Kann Inklusiv!?"