A new approach to data evaluation in the non-target screening of organic trace substances in water analysis

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

A new approach to data evaluation in the non-target screening of organic trace substances in water analysis. / Müller, Alexander; Ruck, Wolfgang; Weber, Walter H. et al.
In: Chemosphere, Vol. 85, No. 8, 11.2011, p. 1211–1219.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Müller A, Ruck W, Weber WH, Schulz W. A new approach to data evaluation in the non-target screening of organic trace substances in water analysis. Chemosphere. 2011 Nov;85(8):1211–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.009

Bibtex

@article{32987c8d3afa43ed8374878557446dff,
title = "A new approach to data evaluation in the non-target screening of organic trace substances in water analysis",
abstract = "Non-target screening via high performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS) has gained increasingly in importance for monitoring organic trace substances in water resources targeted for the production of drinking water. In this article a new approach for evaluating the data from non-target HPLC–MS screening in water is introduced and its advantages are demonstrated using the supply of drinking water as an example. The crucial difference between this and other approaches is the comparison of samples based on compounds (features) determined by their full scan data. In so doing, we take advantage of the temporal, spatial, or process-based relationships among the samples by applying the set operators, UNION, INTERSECT, and COMPLEMENT to the features of each sample. This approach regards all compounds, detectable by the used analytical method. That is the fundamental meaning of non-target screening, which includes all analytical information from the applied technique for further data evaluation. In the given example, in just one step, all detected features (1729) of a landfill leachate sample could be examined for their relevant influences on water purification respectively drinking water. This study shows that 1721 out of 1729 features were not relevant for the water purification. Only eight features could be determined in the untreated water and three of them were found in the final drinking water after ozonation. In so doing, it was possible to identify 1-adamantylamine as contamination of the landfill in the drinking water at a concentration in the range of 20 ng L−1. To support the identification of relevant compounds and their transformation products, the DAIOS database (Database-Assisted Identification of Organic Substances) was used. This database concept includes some functions such as product ion search to increase the efficiency of the database query after the screening. To identify related transformation products the database function “transformation tree” was used.",
keywords = "Chemistry, General Unknown Screening, HPLC-QTOF-MS, Non-target screening, Transformation products, Water purification",
author = "Alexander M{\"u}ller and Wolfgang Ruck and Weber, {Walter H.} and Wolfgang Schulz",
note = "Umweltchemie_2011_24_Mueller.pdf",
year = "2011",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.009",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "1211–1219",
journal = "Chemosphere",
issn = "0045-6535",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new approach to data evaluation in the non-target screening of organic trace substances in water analysis

AU - Müller, Alexander

AU - Ruck, Wolfgang

AU - Weber, Walter H.

AU - Schulz, Wolfgang

N1 - Umweltchemie_2011_24_Mueller.pdf

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Non-target screening via high performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS) has gained increasingly in importance for monitoring organic trace substances in water resources targeted for the production of drinking water. In this article a new approach for evaluating the data from non-target HPLC–MS screening in water is introduced and its advantages are demonstrated using the supply of drinking water as an example. The crucial difference between this and other approaches is the comparison of samples based on compounds (features) determined by their full scan data. In so doing, we take advantage of the temporal, spatial, or process-based relationships among the samples by applying the set operators, UNION, INTERSECT, and COMPLEMENT to the features of each sample. This approach regards all compounds, detectable by the used analytical method. That is the fundamental meaning of non-target screening, which includes all analytical information from the applied technique for further data evaluation. In the given example, in just one step, all detected features (1729) of a landfill leachate sample could be examined for their relevant influences on water purification respectively drinking water. This study shows that 1721 out of 1729 features were not relevant for the water purification. Only eight features could be determined in the untreated water and three of them were found in the final drinking water after ozonation. In so doing, it was possible to identify 1-adamantylamine as contamination of the landfill in the drinking water at a concentration in the range of 20 ng L−1. To support the identification of relevant compounds and their transformation products, the DAIOS database (Database-Assisted Identification of Organic Substances) was used. This database concept includes some functions such as product ion search to increase the efficiency of the database query after the screening. To identify related transformation products the database function “transformation tree” was used.

AB - Non-target screening via high performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS) has gained increasingly in importance for monitoring organic trace substances in water resources targeted for the production of drinking water. In this article a new approach for evaluating the data from non-target HPLC–MS screening in water is introduced and its advantages are demonstrated using the supply of drinking water as an example. The crucial difference between this and other approaches is the comparison of samples based on compounds (features) determined by their full scan data. In so doing, we take advantage of the temporal, spatial, or process-based relationships among the samples by applying the set operators, UNION, INTERSECT, and COMPLEMENT to the features of each sample. This approach regards all compounds, detectable by the used analytical method. That is the fundamental meaning of non-target screening, which includes all analytical information from the applied technique for further data evaluation. In the given example, in just one step, all detected features (1729) of a landfill leachate sample could be examined for their relevant influences on water purification respectively drinking water. This study shows that 1721 out of 1729 features were not relevant for the water purification. Only eight features could be determined in the untreated water and three of them were found in the final drinking water after ozonation. In so doing, it was possible to identify 1-adamantylamine as contamination of the landfill in the drinking water at a concentration in the range of 20 ng L−1. To support the identification of relevant compounds and their transformation products, the DAIOS database (Database-Assisted Identification of Organic Substances) was used. This database concept includes some functions such as product ion search to increase the efficiency of the database query after the screening. To identify related transformation products the database function “transformation tree” was used.

KW - Chemistry

KW - General Unknown Screening

KW - HPLC-QTOF-MS

KW - Non-target screening

KW - Transformation products

KW - Water purification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82455199258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.009

DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.009

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 21820694

VL - 85

SP - 1211

EP - 1219

JO - Chemosphere

JF - Chemosphere

SN - 0045-6535

IS - 8

ER -