Wasted money, wasted time? The sustainability of EU assistance to Hungary and Poland’s waste management sector

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Wasted money, wasted time? The sustainability of EU assistance to Hungary and Poland’s waste management sector. / Cotta, Benedetta.
in: EMECON - Employment and economy in Central and Eastern Europe, Jahrgang 7, Nr. 1, 01.03.2018, S. 1-18.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{57b1491ae7074167b0305b65ea5dcc22,
title = "Wasted money, wasted time?: The sustainability of EU assistance to Hungary and Poland{\textquoteright}s waste management sector",
abstract = "In the late 1990s, European experts feared a stalemate in the EU accession negotiations with Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries because of the expected high costs of their compliance with the EU{\textquoteright}s environmental legislation. This fear was not borne out, however, and it is now undoubted that EU assistance has enhanced environmental capacity-building and knowledge in these countries. Nevertheless, some reports have emphasised misallocations, planning failures and mismanagement of EU funds, characterised as the unsustainability of EU-funded environmental projects in a number of CEE countries. Why have some EU-funded projects been more sustainable than others? Which features have had an effect on their sustainability? The article investigates the relationship between European and domestic actors involved in EU-funded projects in municipal waste management in Hungary and Poland in the years 1998–2013. The main findings show that when decision-making participation was horizontal and cooperative between the EU and domestic actors, EU assistance to municipal waste projects was more successful and long-lasting in helping them comply with EU legislation.",
keywords = "Politics, Environmental sustainability, Municipal waste management, State and non-state actors, Environmental sustainability, Central and Eastern Europe, EU-funded projects, State and non-state actors, Municipal waste management",
author = "Benedetta Cotta",
year = "2018",
month = mar,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "EMECON - Employment and economy in Central and Eastern Europe",
issn = "2191-7078",
publisher = "Institute for East-European Studies at Free University Berlin",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wasted money, wasted time?

T2 - The sustainability of EU assistance to Hungary and Poland’s waste management sector

AU - Cotta, Benedetta

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - In the late 1990s, European experts feared a stalemate in the EU accession negotiations with Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries because of the expected high costs of their compliance with the EU’s environmental legislation. This fear was not borne out, however, and it is now undoubted that EU assistance has enhanced environmental capacity-building and knowledge in these countries. Nevertheless, some reports have emphasised misallocations, planning failures and mismanagement of EU funds, characterised as the unsustainability of EU-funded environmental projects in a number of CEE countries. Why have some EU-funded projects been more sustainable than others? Which features have had an effect on their sustainability? The article investigates the relationship between European and domestic actors involved in EU-funded projects in municipal waste management in Hungary and Poland in the years 1998–2013. The main findings show that when decision-making participation was horizontal and cooperative between the EU and domestic actors, EU assistance to municipal waste projects was more successful and long-lasting in helping them comply with EU legislation.

AB - In the late 1990s, European experts feared a stalemate in the EU accession negotiations with Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries because of the expected high costs of their compliance with the EU’s environmental legislation. This fear was not borne out, however, and it is now undoubted that EU assistance has enhanced environmental capacity-building and knowledge in these countries. Nevertheless, some reports have emphasised misallocations, planning failures and mismanagement of EU funds, characterised as the unsustainability of EU-funded environmental projects in a number of CEE countries. Why have some EU-funded projects been more sustainable than others? Which features have had an effect on their sustainability? The article investigates the relationship between European and domestic actors involved in EU-funded projects in municipal waste management in Hungary and Poland in the years 1998–2013. The main findings show that when decision-making participation was horizontal and cooperative between the EU and domestic actors, EU assistance to municipal waste projects was more successful and long-lasting in helping them comply with EU legislation.

KW - Politics

KW - Environmental sustainability

KW - Municipal waste management

KW - State and non-state actors

KW - Environmental sustainability

KW - Central and Eastern Europe

KW - EU-funded projects

KW - State and non-state actors

KW - Municipal waste management

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 7

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - EMECON - Employment and economy in Central and Eastern Europe

JF - EMECON - Employment and economy in Central and Eastern Europe

SN - 2191-7078

IS - 1

ER -

Dokumente

Links