Wasted money, wasted time? The sustainability of EU assistance to Hungary and Poland’s waste management sector
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: EMECON - Employment and economy in Central and Eastern Europe, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.03.2018, p. 1-18.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Wasted money, wasted time?
T2 - The sustainability of EU assistance to Hungary and Poland’s waste management sector
AU - Cotta, Benedetta
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - In the late 1990s, European experts feared a stalemate in the EU accession negotiations with Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries because of the expected high costs of their compliance with the EU’s environmental legislation. This fear was not borne out, however, and it is now undoubted that EU assistance has enhanced environmental capacity-building and knowledge in these countries. Nevertheless, some reports have emphasised misallocations, planning failures and mismanagement of EU funds, characterised as the unsustainability of EU-funded environmental projects in a number of CEE countries. Why have some EU-funded projects been more sustainable than others? Which features have had an effect on their sustainability? The article investigates the relationship between European and domestic actors involved in EU-funded projects in municipal waste management in Hungary and Poland in the years 1998–2013. The main findings show that when decision-making participation was horizontal and cooperative between the EU and domestic actors, EU assistance to municipal waste projects was more successful and long-lasting in helping them comply with EU legislation.
AB - In the late 1990s, European experts feared a stalemate in the EU accession negotiations with Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries because of the expected high costs of their compliance with the EU’s environmental legislation. This fear was not borne out, however, and it is now undoubted that EU assistance has enhanced environmental capacity-building and knowledge in these countries. Nevertheless, some reports have emphasised misallocations, planning failures and mismanagement of EU funds, characterised as the unsustainability of EU-funded environmental projects in a number of CEE countries. Why have some EU-funded projects been more sustainable than others? Which features have had an effect on their sustainability? The article investigates the relationship between European and domestic actors involved in EU-funded projects in municipal waste management in Hungary and Poland in the years 1998–2013. The main findings show that when decision-making participation was horizontal and cooperative between the EU and domestic actors, EU assistance to municipal waste projects was more successful and long-lasting in helping them comply with EU legislation.
KW - Politics
KW - Environmental sustainability
KW - Municipal waste management
KW - State and non-state actors
KW - Environmental sustainability
KW - Central and Eastern Europe
KW - EU-funded projects
KW - State and non-state actors
KW - Municipal waste management
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 7
SP - 1
EP - 18
JO - EMECON - Employment and economy in Central and Eastern Europe
JF - EMECON - Employment and economy in Central and Eastern Europe
SN - 2191-7078
IS - 1
ER -