Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenKommentare / Debatten / BerichteForschung

Authors

  • Michael J. Fell
  • Laura Pagel
  • Chien fei Chen
  • Matthew H. Goldberg
  • Mario Herberz
  • Gesche M. Huebner
  • Siddharth Sareen
  • Ulf J.J. Hahnel

Measures to control the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are having unprecedented impacts on people's lives around the world. In this paper, we argue that those conducting social research in the energy domain should give special consideration to the internal and external validity of their work conducted during this pandemic period. We set out a number of principles that researchers can consider to give themselves and research users greater confidence that findings and recommendations will still be applicable in years to come. Largely grounded in existing good practice guidance, our recommendations include collecting and reporting additional supporting contextual data, reviewing aspects of research design for vulnerability to validity challenges, and building in longitudinal elements where feasible. We suggest that these approaches also bring a number of opportunities to generate new insights. However, we caution that a more systemic challenge to validity of knowledge produced during this period may result from changes in the kinds of social research that it is practicable to pursue.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer101646
ZeitschriftEnergy Research and Social Science
Jahrgang68
Anzahl der Seiten7
ISSN2214-6296
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 10.2020
Extern publiziertJa

Bibliographische Notiz

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd

DOI