The intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation: a review

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

The intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation: a review. / Glamann, Josefine; Hanspach, Jan; Abson, David J. et al.
in: Regional Environmental Change, Jahrgang 17, Nr. 5, 01.06.2017, S. 1303–1313.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{40000db987ef4ad9a408bda6a100d5e3,
title = "The intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation: a review",
abstract = "Food security and biodiversity conservation are key challenges of the twenty-first century. While traditionally these two challenges were addressed separately, recently, papers have begun to specifically address the nexus of food security and biodiversity conservation. We conducted a structured literature review of 91 papers addressing this nexus. To ascertain how a given paper approached the topic, we assessed to what extent it covered 68 potentially relevant issues. The resulting dataset was analyzed using cluster analysis. Two main branches of literature, containing a total of six clusters of papers, were identified. The “biophysical-technical” branch (clusters: “sustainable intensification” and “production focus”) was dominated by the natural sciences, focused strongly on the production aspect of food security, and sought general solutions. In contrast, the “social-political” branch (clusters: “social-ecological development”; “empowerment for food security”; “agroecology and food sovereignty”; and “social-ecological systems”) often drew on the social sciences and emphasized social relations and governance, alongside broader considerations of sustainability and human well-being. While the biophysical-technical branch was often global in focus, much of the social-political branch focused on specific localities. Two clusters of papers, one from each branch, stood out as being particularly broad in scope—namely the clusters on “sustainable intensification” and “agroecology and food sovereignty.” Despite major differences in their conceptual basis, we argue that exchange between these two research clusters could be particularly helpful in generating insights on the food–biodiversity nexus that are both generally applicable and sufficiently nuanced to capture key system-specific variables.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Agroecology , Biodiversity conservation, Cluster analysis, Food sovereignty, Food security, Sustainable intensification",
author = "Josefine Glamann and Jan Hanspach and Abson, {David J.} and Neil Collier and Joern Fischer",
year = "2017",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10113-015-0873-3",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "1303–1313",
journal = "Regional Environmental Change",
issn = "1436-3798",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation

T2 - a review

AU - Glamann, Josefine

AU - Hanspach, Jan

AU - Abson, David J.

AU - Collier, Neil

AU - Fischer, Joern

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Food security and biodiversity conservation are key challenges of the twenty-first century. While traditionally these two challenges were addressed separately, recently, papers have begun to specifically address the nexus of food security and biodiversity conservation. We conducted a structured literature review of 91 papers addressing this nexus. To ascertain how a given paper approached the topic, we assessed to what extent it covered 68 potentially relevant issues. The resulting dataset was analyzed using cluster analysis. Two main branches of literature, containing a total of six clusters of papers, were identified. The “biophysical-technical” branch (clusters: “sustainable intensification” and “production focus”) was dominated by the natural sciences, focused strongly on the production aspect of food security, and sought general solutions. In contrast, the “social-political” branch (clusters: “social-ecological development”; “empowerment for food security”; “agroecology and food sovereignty”; and “social-ecological systems”) often drew on the social sciences and emphasized social relations and governance, alongside broader considerations of sustainability and human well-being. While the biophysical-technical branch was often global in focus, much of the social-political branch focused on specific localities. Two clusters of papers, one from each branch, stood out as being particularly broad in scope—namely the clusters on “sustainable intensification” and “agroecology and food sovereignty.” Despite major differences in their conceptual basis, we argue that exchange between these two research clusters could be particularly helpful in generating insights on the food–biodiversity nexus that are both generally applicable and sufficiently nuanced to capture key system-specific variables.

AB - Food security and biodiversity conservation are key challenges of the twenty-first century. While traditionally these two challenges were addressed separately, recently, papers have begun to specifically address the nexus of food security and biodiversity conservation. We conducted a structured literature review of 91 papers addressing this nexus. To ascertain how a given paper approached the topic, we assessed to what extent it covered 68 potentially relevant issues. The resulting dataset was analyzed using cluster analysis. Two main branches of literature, containing a total of six clusters of papers, were identified. The “biophysical-technical” branch (clusters: “sustainable intensification” and “production focus”) was dominated by the natural sciences, focused strongly on the production aspect of food security, and sought general solutions. In contrast, the “social-political” branch (clusters: “social-ecological development”; “empowerment for food security”; “agroecology and food sovereignty”; and “social-ecological systems”) often drew on the social sciences and emphasized social relations and governance, alongside broader considerations of sustainability and human well-being. While the biophysical-technical branch was often global in focus, much of the social-political branch focused on specific localities. Two clusters of papers, one from each branch, stood out as being particularly broad in scope—namely the clusters on “sustainable intensification” and “agroecology and food sovereignty.” Despite major differences in their conceptual basis, we argue that exchange between these two research clusters could be particularly helpful in generating insights on the food–biodiversity nexus that are both generally applicable and sufficiently nuanced to capture key system-specific variables.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Agroecology

KW - Biodiversity conservation

KW - Cluster analysis

KW - Food sovereignty

KW - Food security

KW - Sustainable intensification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944600097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/7ab55ec0-add6-334e-8910-21265d04a256/

U2 - 10.1007/s10113-015-0873-3

DO - 10.1007/s10113-015-0873-3

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:84944600097

VL - 17

SP - 1303

EP - 1313

JO - Regional Environmental Change

JF - Regional Environmental Change

SN - 1436-3798

IS - 5

ER -

DOI