The intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation: a review
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Standard
In: Regional Environmental Change, Vol. 17, No. 5, 01.06.2017, p. 1303–1313.
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The intersection of food security and biodiversity conservation
T2 - a review
AU - Glamann, Josefine
AU - Hanspach, Jan
AU - Abson, David J.
AU - Collier, Neil
AU - Fischer, Joern
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - Food security and biodiversity conservation are key challenges of the twenty-first century. While traditionally these two challenges were addressed separately, recently, papers have begun to specifically address the nexus of food security and biodiversity conservation. We conducted a structured literature review of 91 papers addressing this nexus. To ascertain how a given paper approached the topic, we assessed to what extent it covered 68 potentially relevant issues. The resulting dataset was analyzed using cluster analysis. Two main branches of literature, containing a total of six clusters of papers, were identified. The “biophysical-technical” branch (clusters: “sustainable intensification” and “production focus”) was dominated by the natural sciences, focused strongly on the production aspect of food security, and sought general solutions. In contrast, the “social-political” branch (clusters: “social-ecological development”; “empowerment for food security”; “agroecology and food sovereignty”; and “social-ecological systems”) often drew on the social sciences and emphasized social relations and governance, alongside broader considerations of sustainability and human well-being. While the biophysical-technical branch was often global in focus, much of the social-political branch focused on specific localities. Two clusters of papers, one from each branch, stood out as being particularly broad in scope—namely the clusters on “sustainable intensification” and “agroecology and food sovereignty.” Despite major differences in their conceptual basis, we argue that exchange between these two research clusters could be particularly helpful in generating insights on the food–biodiversity nexus that are both generally applicable and sufficiently nuanced to capture key system-specific variables.
AB - Food security and biodiversity conservation are key challenges of the twenty-first century. While traditionally these two challenges were addressed separately, recently, papers have begun to specifically address the nexus of food security and biodiversity conservation. We conducted a structured literature review of 91 papers addressing this nexus. To ascertain how a given paper approached the topic, we assessed to what extent it covered 68 potentially relevant issues. The resulting dataset was analyzed using cluster analysis. Two main branches of literature, containing a total of six clusters of papers, were identified. The “biophysical-technical” branch (clusters: “sustainable intensification” and “production focus”) was dominated by the natural sciences, focused strongly on the production aspect of food security, and sought general solutions. In contrast, the “social-political” branch (clusters: “social-ecological development”; “empowerment for food security”; “agroecology and food sovereignty”; and “social-ecological systems”) often drew on the social sciences and emphasized social relations and governance, alongside broader considerations of sustainability and human well-being. While the biophysical-technical branch was often global in focus, much of the social-political branch focused on specific localities. Two clusters of papers, one from each branch, stood out as being particularly broad in scope—namely the clusters on “sustainable intensification” and “agroecology and food sovereignty.” Despite major differences in their conceptual basis, we argue that exchange between these two research clusters could be particularly helpful in generating insights on the food–biodiversity nexus that are both generally applicable and sufficiently nuanced to capture key system-specific variables.
KW - Sustainability Science
KW - Agroecology
KW - Biodiversity conservation
KW - Cluster analysis
KW - Food sovereignty
KW - Food security
KW - Sustainable intensification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944600097&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/7ab55ec0-add6-334e-8910-21265d04a256/
U2 - 10.1007/s10113-015-0873-3
DO - 10.1007/s10113-015-0873-3
M3 - Scientific review articles
AN - SCOPUS:84944600097
VL - 17
SP - 1303
EP - 1313
JO - Regional Environmental Change
JF - Regional Environmental Change
SN - 1436-3798
IS - 5
ER -