Procedural Frames in Negotiations: How offering my resources versus requesting yours impacts perception, behavior, and outcomes

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Procedural Frames in Negotiations: How offering my resources versus requesting yours impacts perception, behavior, and outcomes. / Trötschel, Roman; Loschelder, David Demian; Höhne, Benjamin et al.
in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Jahrgang 108, Nr. 3, 01.03.2015, S. 417-435.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6166f0650a9e4186b06ef83a6241a0f3,
title = "Procedural Frames in Negotiations: How offering my resources versus requesting yours impacts perception, behavior, and outcomes",
abstract = "Although abundant negotiation research has examined outcome frames, little is known about the procedural framing of negotiation proposals (i.e., offering my vs. requesting your resources). In a series of 8 experiments, we tested the prediction that negotiators would show a stronger concession aversion and attain better individual outcomes when their own resource, rather than the counterpart's, is the accentuated reference resource in a transaction. First, senders of proposals revealed a stronger concession aversion when they offered their own rather than requested the counterpart's resources- both in buyer-seller (Experiment 1a) and in classic transaction negotiations (Experiment 2a). Expectedly, this effect reversed for recipients: When receiving requests rather than offers, recipients experienced a stronger concession aversion in buyer-seller (Experiment 1b) and transaction negotiations (Experiment 2b). Experiments 3-5 investigated procedural frames in the interactive process of negotiations-with elementary schoolchildren (Experiment 3), in a buyer-seller context (Experiments 4a and 4b), and in a computer-mediated transaction negotiation void of buyer and seller roles (Experiment 5). In summary, 8 experiments showed that negotiators are more concession averse and claim more individual value when negotiation proposals are framed to highlight their own rather than the counterpart's resources.",
keywords = "Psychology, Concession aversion, Negotiations, Offer, Procedural frames, Request",
author = "Roman Tr{\"o}tschel and Loschelder, {David Demian} and Benjamin H{\"o}hne and Majer, {Johann Martin}",
year = "2015",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/pspi0000009",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "417--435",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Procedural Frames in Negotiations

T2 - How offering my resources versus requesting yours impacts perception, behavior, and outcomes

AU - Trötschel, Roman

AU - Loschelder, David Demian

AU - Höhne, Benjamin

AU - Majer, Johann Martin

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Although abundant negotiation research has examined outcome frames, little is known about the procedural framing of negotiation proposals (i.e., offering my vs. requesting your resources). In a series of 8 experiments, we tested the prediction that negotiators would show a stronger concession aversion and attain better individual outcomes when their own resource, rather than the counterpart's, is the accentuated reference resource in a transaction. First, senders of proposals revealed a stronger concession aversion when they offered their own rather than requested the counterpart's resources- both in buyer-seller (Experiment 1a) and in classic transaction negotiations (Experiment 2a). Expectedly, this effect reversed for recipients: When receiving requests rather than offers, recipients experienced a stronger concession aversion in buyer-seller (Experiment 1b) and transaction negotiations (Experiment 2b). Experiments 3-5 investigated procedural frames in the interactive process of negotiations-with elementary schoolchildren (Experiment 3), in a buyer-seller context (Experiments 4a and 4b), and in a computer-mediated transaction negotiation void of buyer and seller roles (Experiment 5). In summary, 8 experiments showed that negotiators are more concession averse and claim more individual value when negotiation proposals are framed to highlight their own rather than the counterpart's resources.

AB - Although abundant negotiation research has examined outcome frames, little is known about the procedural framing of negotiation proposals (i.e., offering my vs. requesting your resources). In a series of 8 experiments, we tested the prediction that negotiators would show a stronger concession aversion and attain better individual outcomes when their own resource, rather than the counterpart's, is the accentuated reference resource in a transaction. First, senders of proposals revealed a stronger concession aversion when they offered their own rather than requested the counterpart's resources- both in buyer-seller (Experiment 1a) and in classic transaction negotiations (Experiment 2a). Expectedly, this effect reversed for recipients: When receiving requests rather than offers, recipients experienced a stronger concession aversion in buyer-seller (Experiment 1b) and transaction negotiations (Experiment 2b). Experiments 3-5 investigated procedural frames in the interactive process of negotiations-with elementary schoolchildren (Experiment 3), in a buyer-seller context (Experiments 4a and 4b), and in a computer-mediated transaction negotiation void of buyer and seller roles (Experiment 5). In summary, 8 experiments showed that negotiators are more concession averse and claim more individual value when negotiation proposals are framed to highlight their own rather than the counterpart's resources.

KW - Psychology

KW - Concession aversion

KW - Negotiations

KW - Offer

KW - Procedural frames

KW - Request

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925689975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pspi0000009

DO - 10.1037/pspi0000009

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 25751716

VL - 108

SP - 417

EP - 435

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 3

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. The “New Marx Reading”
  2. Do workers perceive high wage settlements of craft unions as fair?
  3. Dissolved carbon leaching from an Irish cropland soil is increased by reduced tillage and cover cropping
  4. The Implementation of the National Park Idea in Society
  5. LC-HRMS Data Processing Strategy for Reliable Sample Comparison Exemplified by the Assessment of Water Treatment Processes
  6. Future thought and the self-regulation of energization
  7. Facettenreiche Wirtschaftsinformatik
  8. Ownership Structure and Firm Performance in the Egyptian Manufacturing Sector
  9. Germany's trade in goods
  10. Modeling risk contagion in the Italian zonal electricity market
  11. Warum Unternehmen scheitern
  12. Arbeitsplatzdynamik in den Industriebetrieben in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 1998/99
  13. Newest developments on the manufacture of helical profiles by hot extrusion
  14. Zur Regulierungsdynamik des Prüfungsausschusses
  15. Sexing Berlin?
  16. Role of SiC in grain refinement of aluminum-free Mg-Zn alloys
  17. Energy policy and transdisciplinary transition management arenas in illiberal democracies
  18. A Note on Firm Age and the Margins of Exports
  19. Empowering Communities Through Citizen Entrepreneurship
  20. Technical and economic assessment of food waste valorization through a biorefinery chain
  21. Steuerliche Gewinnermittlung bei Unternehmen
  22. Auch Lehrer müssen sich wohlfühlen
  23. Enhancing the transformative potential of sustainability innovations
  24. Wissen Kompakt
  25. Soziale Ungleichheit im Licht des Längsschnittdatensatzes "Scientific Use File" (SUF)
  26. Dataset size versus homogeneity
  27. Goodbye Germany! The influence of personality and cognitive factors on the intention to work abroad
  28. New draft law on environmental licensing is a major threat to the Brazilian ecosystems and can hinder ecological restoration efforts
  29. Kooperation von Lehrkräftebildnern im Langzeitpraktikum