How Individuals React Emotionally to Others’ (Mis)Fortunes: A Social Comparison Framework

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Authors

When confronted with others’ fortunes and misfortunes, emotional reactions can take various forms—ranging from assimilative (happy-for-ness, sympathy) to contrastive emotions (envy, schadenfreude) and from prosocial (reward) to antisocial behavior (punish). We systematically tested how social comparisons shape reactions to others’ (mis)fortunes with a newly developed paradigm with which we investigated envy, happyfor- ness, schadenfreude, and sympathy in a joint rigorous experimental setup, along with individuals’ ensuing behavioral reactions. In nine experiments (Ntotal = 1,827), (a) participants’ rankings on a comparison dimension relative to other people and (b) others’ (mis)fortunes (changes in relative rankings) jointly determined how much individuals experienced the emotions. Upward comparisons increased envy and schadenfreude, and downward comparisons increased sympathy and happy-for-ness, relative to lateral comparisons. When the relevance of comparison standards (Experiment 4a) or the comparison domain (Experiment 4b) was low, or when participants did not have their own reference point for comparison (Experiment 4c), the effect of comparison direction on emotions was attenuated. Emotions also predicted the ensuing behavior: Envy and schadenfreude predicted less, whereas happy-for-ness and sympathy predicted more prosocial behavior (Experiments 5 and 6). Overall, the strongest social comparison effects occurred for envy and sympathy, followed by schadenfreude and happy-for-ness. The data suggest that envy and sympathy arise when comparative concerns are threatened, and happy-for-ness and schadenfreude arise when they are satisfied (because inequality increases vs. decreases, respectively) and predict behavior aimed at dealing with these concerns. We discuss implications for the function of fortunes-of-others emotions, social comparison theory, inequity aversion, and prospect theory.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Jahrgang123
Ausgabenummer1
Seiten (von - bis)55-83
Anzahl der Seiten29
ISSN0022-3514
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 01.07.2022

Bibliographische Notiz

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Research Unit FOR 2150: Relativity in Social Cognition: Antecedents and Consequences of Comparative Thinking under Grant 246329797.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022. American Psychological Association

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Olaf Anderßon

Aktivitäten

  1. Exploring business models of sustainability pioneers - An analysis of case studies in the smartphone industry
  2. The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens
  3. Digitale Führung (Keynote)
  4. Transition into Unemployment and Demand for Social Protection. The Imperfection of Measurement or Perfection of Social Policy in Germany?
  5. A longitudinal study of the effect of the year abroad on L2 pragmatic competence.: Research Seminar on Applied Linguistics (Universität Bonn)
  6. Die Versinnbildlichung der Wissenschaft am Beispiel des Science Slams
  7. EuroNanoForum 2011
  8. Fakultät Management und Technologie (Organisation)
  9. Enteignung russisch kontrollierter Energieinfrastruktur
  10. Enforceable Brand Agreements and Due Diligence Legislation: Complements or Substitutes in the Labor Governance of Global Supply Chains?
  11. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research (Fachzeitschrift)
  12. Books for young patriots. A comparative look at British and German picturebooks published before and during the First World War
  13. 2016 Conference of the International Association for Media and Communication Research - IAMCR 2016
  14. Sprache(n) und Berufliche Bildung. Qualifizierung und Beschulung von Seiteneinsteigern
  15. OS4Future: an academic advocacy for our future
  16. 52. Jahrestagung der Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Englisch an Gesamtschulen - BAG 2014
  17. Hochschule Darmstadt (Externe Organisation)
  18. Bearbeitung von Problemlöseaufgaben unterstützt durch papier- und videobasierter Lösungsbeispiele
  19. Fakultät Management und Technologie (Organisation)
  20. Little Fish in a Big Pond? Auswirkungen von inklusivem Unterricht in der Sekundarstufe auf das Selbstkonzept von Schüler*innen mit Förderbedarf Lernen.
  21. Podiumsdiskussion: Vom Unrechtskontext zur Kooperation? Über den Umgang mit dem kolonialen Erbe.