Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates. / Schindler, S.; von Wehrden, H.; Poirazidis, K. et al.

in: Ecological Indicators, Jahrgang 31, 08.2013, S. 41-48.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Schindler S, von Wehrden H, Poirazidis K, Wrbka T, Kati V. Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates. Ecological Indicators. 2013 Aug;31:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.012

Bibtex

@article{bd7ed376b1e741cab974dfd672f7bf23,
title = "Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates",
abstract = "Landscape metrics are widely used to investigate the spatial structure of landscapes. Numerous metrics are currently available, yet only little empirical research has comparatively examined their indicator value for species richness for several taxa at several scales. Taking a Mediterranean forest landscape - Dadia National Park (Greece) - as a case study area, we explored the performance of 52 landscape level landscape metrics as indicators of species richness for six taxa (woody plants, orchids, orthopterans, amphibians, reptiles, and small terrestrial birds) and for overall species richness. We computed the landscape metrics for circular areas of five different extents around each of 30 sampling plots. We applied linear mixed models to evaluate significant relations between metrics and species richness and to assess the effects of the extent of the considered landscape on the performance of the metrics. Our results showed that landscape metrics were good indicators for overall species richness, woody plants, orthopterans and reptiles. Metrics quantifying patch shape, proximity, texture and landscape diversity resulted often in well-fitted models, while those describing patch area, similarity and edge contrast rarely contributed to significant models. Spatial scale affected the performance of the metrics, since woody plants, orthopterans and small terrestrial birds were usually better predicted at smaller extents of surrounding landscape, and reptiles frequently at larger ones. The revealed pattern of relations and performances will be useful to understand landscape structure as a driver and indicator of biodiversity, and to improve forest and landscape management decisions in Mediterranean and other forest mosaics.",
keywords = "Ecosystems Research, Biodiversity indicators, Landscape structure, Landscape heterogeneity, Scale, Dadia National Park",
author = "S. Schindler and {von Wehrden}, H. and K. Poirazidis and T. Wrbka and V. Kati",
note = "Export Date: 21 May 2012 Source: Scopus Article in Press doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.012 Language of Original Document: English Correspondence Address: Schindler, S.; Department of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, University of Vienna;email: stefan.schindler@univie.ac.at",
year = "2013",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.012",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "41--48",
journal = "Ecological Indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates

AU - Schindler, S.

AU - von Wehrden, H.

AU - Poirazidis, K.

AU - Wrbka, T.

AU - Kati, V.

N1 - Export Date: 21 May 2012 Source: Scopus Article in Press doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.012 Language of Original Document: English Correspondence Address: Schindler, S.; Department of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, University of Vienna;email: stefan.schindler@univie.ac.at

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Landscape metrics are widely used to investigate the spatial structure of landscapes. Numerous metrics are currently available, yet only little empirical research has comparatively examined their indicator value for species richness for several taxa at several scales. Taking a Mediterranean forest landscape - Dadia National Park (Greece) - as a case study area, we explored the performance of 52 landscape level landscape metrics as indicators of species richness for six taxa (woody plants, orchids, orthopterans, amphibians, reptiles, and small terrestrial birds) and for overall species richness. We computed the landscape metrics for circular areas of five different extents around each of 30 sampling plots. We applied linear mixed models to evaluate significant relations between metrics and species richness and to assess the effects of the extent of the considered landscape on the performance of the metrics. Our results showed that landscape metrics were good indicators for overall species richness, woody plants, orthopterans and reptiles. Metrics quantifying patch shape, proximity, texture and landscape diversity resulted often in well-fitted models, while those describing patch area, similarity and edge contrast rarely contributed to significant models. Spatial scale affected the performance of the metrics, since woody plants, orthopterans and small terrestrial birds were usually better predicted at smaller extents of surrounding landscape, and reptiles frequently at larger ones. The revealed pattern of relations and performances will be useful to understand landscape structure as a driver and indicator of biodiversity, and to improve forest and landscape management decisions in Mediterranean and other forest mosaics.

AB - Landscape metrics are widely used to investigate the spatial structure of landscapes. Numerous metrics are currently available, yet only little empirical research has comparatively examined their indicator value for species richness for several taxa at several scales. Taking a Mediterranean forest landscape - Dadia National Park (Greece) - as a case study area, we explored the performance of 52 landscape level landscape metrics as indicators of species richness for six taxa (woody plants, orchids, orthopterans, amphibians, reptiles, and small terrestrial birds) and for overall species richness. We computed the landscape metrics for circular areas of five different extents around each of 30 sampling plots. We applied linear mixed models to evaluate significant relations between metrics and species richness and to assess the effects of the extent of the considered landscape on the performance of the metrics. Our results showed that landscape metrics were good indicators for overall species richness, woody plants, orthopterans and reptiles. Metrics quantifying patch shape, proximity, texture and landscape diversity resulted often in well-fitted models, while those describing patch area, similarity and edge contrast rarely contributed to significant models. Spatial scale affected the performance of the metrics, since woody plants, orthopterans and small terrestrial birds were usually better predicted at smaller extents of surrounding landscape, and reptiles frequently at larger ones. The revealed pattern of relations and performances will be useful to understand landscape structure as a driver and indicator of biodiversity, and to improve forest and landscape management decisions in Mediterranean and other forest mosaics.

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Biodiversity indicators

KW - Landscape structure

KW - Landscape heterogeneity

KW - Scale

KW - Dadia National Park

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879583405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.012

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 31

SP - 41

EP - 48

JO - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -

DOI