How Much Tracking Is Necessary? - The Learning Curve in Bayesian User Journey Analysis

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in KonferenzbändenForschungbegutachtet

Standard

How Much Tracking Is Necessary? - The Learning Curve in Bayesian User Journey Analysis. / Stange, Martin; Funk, Burkhardt.

Proceedings of the Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems. AIS eLibrary, 2015.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in KonferenzbändenForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Stange, M & Funk, B 2015, How Much Tracking Is Necessary? - The Learning Curve in Bayesian User Journey Analysis. in Proceedings of the Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems. AIS eLibrary, 23rd European Conference on Information Systems - ECIS 2015, Münster, Deutschland, 26.05.15. https://doi.org/10.18151/7217484

APA

Stange, M., & Funk, B. (2015). How Much Tracking Is Necessary? - The Learning Curve in Bayesian User Journey Analysis. in Proceedings of the Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems AIS eLibrary. https://doi.org/10.18151/7217484

Vancouver

Stange M, Funk B. How Much Tracking Is Necessary? - The Learning Curve in Bayesian User Journey Analysis. in Proceedings of the Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems. AIS eLibrary. 2015 doi: 10.18151/7217484

Bibtex

@inbook{02f02f601bbf4d3c855ca7f8227751ad,
title = "How Much Tracking Is Necessary? - The Learning Curve in Bayesian User Journey Analysis",
abstract = "Extracting value from big data is one of today{\textquoteright}s business challenges. In online marketing, for instance, advertisers use high volume clickstream data to increase the efficiency of their campaigns. To prevent collecting, storing, and processing of irrelevant data, it is crucial to determine how much data to analyze to achieve acceptable model performance. We propose a general procedure that employs the learning curve sampling method to determine the optimal sample size with respect to cost/benefit considerations. Applied in two case studies, we model the users' click behavior based on clickstream data and offline channel data. We observe saturation effects of the predictive accuracy when the sample size is increased and, thus, demonstrate that advertisers only have to analyze a very small subset of the full dataset to obtain an acceptable predictive accuracy and to optimize profits from advertising activities. In both case studies we observe that a random intercept logistic model outperforms a non-hierarchical model in terms of predictive accuracy. Given the high infrastructure costs and the users' growing awareness for tracking activities, our results have managerial implications for companies in the online marketing field. ",
keywords = "Business informatics, Big Data, Online Marketing, User Journey Analysis, Learning Curve, Bayesian Models",
author = "Martin Stange and Burkhardt Funk",
year = "2015",
month = may,
day = "29",
doi = "10.18151/7217484",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-00-050284-2",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems",
publisher = "AIS eLibrary",
address = "United States",
note = "23rd European Conference on Information Systems - ECIS 2015, ECIS conference 2015 ; Conference date: 26-05-2015 Through 29-05-2015",
url = "https://www.ercis.org/, http://www.ecis2015.eu/",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - How Much Tracking Is Necessary? - The Learning Curve in Bayesian User Journey Analysis

AU - Stange, Martin

AU - Funk, Burkhardt

N1 - Conference code: 23

PY - 2015/5/29

Y1 - 2015/5/29

N2 - Extracting value from big data is one of today’s business challenges. In online marketing, for instance, advertisers use high volume clickstream data to increase the efficiency of their campaigns. To prevent collecting, storing, and processing of irrelevant data, it is crucial to determine how much data to analyze to achieve acceptable model performance. We propose a general procedure that employs the learning curve sampling method to determine the optimal sample size with respect to cost/benefit considerations. Applied in two case studies, we model the users' click behavior based on clickstream data and offline channel data. We observe saturation effects of the predictive accuracy when the sample size is increased and, thus, demonstrate that advertisers only have to analyze a very small subset of the full dataset to obtain an acceptable predictive accuracy and to optimize profits from advertising activities. In both case studies we observe that a random intercept logistic model outperforms a non-hierarchical model in terms of predictive accuracy. Given the high infrastructure costs and the users' growing awareness for tracking activities, our results have managerial implications for companies in the online marketing field.

AB - Extracting value from big data is one of today’s business challenges. In online marketing, for instance, advertisers use high volume clickstream data to increase the efficiency of their campaigns. To prevent collecting, storing, and processing of irrelevant data, it is crucial to determine how much data to analyze to achieve acceptable model performance. We propose a general procedure that employs the learning curve sampling method to determine the optimal sample size with respect to cost/benefit considerations. Applied in two case studies, we model the users' click behavior based on clickstream data and offline channel data. We observe saturation effects of the predictive accuracy when the sample size is increased and, thus, demonstrate that advertisers only have to analyze a very small subset of the full dataset to obtain an acceptable predictive accuracy and to optimize profits from advertising activities. In both case studies we observe that a random intercept logistic model outperforms a non-hierarchical model in terms of predictive accuracy. Given the high infrastructure costs and the users' growing awareness for tracking activities, our results have managerial implications for companies in the online marketing field.

KW - Business informatics

KW - Big Data

KW - Online Marketing

KW - User Journey Analysis

KW - Learning Curve

KW - Bayesian Models

U2 - 10.18151/7217484

DO - 10.18151/7217484

M3 - Article in conference proceedings

SN - 978-3-00-050284-2

BT - Proceedings of the Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems

PB - AIS eLibrary

T2 - 23rd European Conference on Information Systems - ECIS 2015

Y2 - 26 May 2015 through 29 May 2015

ER -

Links

DOI