How can we bring together empiricists and modellers in functional biodiversity research?

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

How can we bring together empiricists and modellers in functional biodiversity research? / Jeltsch, Florian; Blaum, Niels; Brose, Ulrich et al.

in: Basic and Applied Ecology, Jahrgang 14, Nr. 2, 01.03.2013, S. 93-101.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Jeltsch, F, Blaum, N, Brose, U, Chipperfield, JD, Clough, Y, Farwig, N, Geissler, K, Graham, CH, Grimm, V, Hickler, T, Huth, A, May, F, Meyer, KM, Pagel, J, Reineking, B, Rillig, MC, Shea, K, Schurr, FM, Schröder, B, Tielbörger, K, Weiss, L, Wiegand, K, Wiegand, T, Wirth, C & Zurell, D 2013, 'How can we bring together empiricists and modellers in functional biodiversity research?', Basic and Applied Ecology, Jg. 14, Nr. 2, S. 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2013.01.001

APA

Jeltsch, F., Blaum, N., Brose, U., Chipperfield, J. D., Clough, Y., Farwig, N., Geissler, K., Graham, C. H., Grimm, V., Hickler, T., Huth, A., May, F., Meyer, K. M., Pagel, J., Reineking, B., Rillig, M. C., Shea, K., Schurr, F. M., Schröder, B., ... Zurell, D. (2013). How can we bring together empiricists and modellers in functional biodiversity research? Basic and Applied Ecology, 14(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2013.01.001

Vancouver

Jeltsch F, Blaum N, Brose U, Chipperfield JD, Clough Y, Farwig N et al. How can we bring together empiricists and modellers in functional biodiversity research? Basic and Applied Ecology. 2013 Mär 1;14(2):93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2013.01.001

Bibtex

@article{9624421bab744049842e1aadbb17a657,
title = "How can we bring together empiricists and modellers in functional biodiversity research?",
abstract = "Improving our understanding of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and our capacity to inform ecosystem management requires an integrated framework for functional biodiversity research (FBR). However, adequate integration among empirical approaches (monitoring and experimental) and modelling has rarely been achieved in FBR. We offer an appraisal of the issues involved and chart a course towards enhanced integration. A major element of this path is the joint orientation towards the continuous refinement of a theoretical framework for FBR that links theory testing and generalization with applied research oriented towards the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. We further emphasize existing decision-making frameworks as suitable instruments to practically merge these different aims of FBR and bring them into application. This integrated framework requires joint research planning, and should improve communication and stimulate collaboration between modellers and empiricists, thereby overcoming existing reservations and prejudices. The implementation of this integrative research agenda for FBR requires an adaptation in most national and international funding schemes in order to accommodate such joint teams and their more complex structures and data needs. {\textcopyright} 2013 Gesellschaft f{\"u}r {\"O}kologie.",
keywords = "Global change, Interdisciplinarity, Biodiversity experiments, Biodiversity theory, Conservation management, Decision-making, Ecosystem functions and services, Forecasting, Functional traits, Monitoring programmes, Ecosystems Research, Gender and Diversity",
author = "Florian Jeltsch and Niels Blaum and Ulrich Brose and Chipperfield, {Joseph D.} and Yann Clough and Nina Farwig and Katja Geissler and Graham, {Catherine H.} and Volker Grimm and Thomas Hickler and Andreas Huth and Felix May and Meyer, {Katrin M.} and J{\"o}rn Pagel and Bj{\"o}rn Reineking and Rillig, {Matthias C.} and Katriona Shea and Schurr, {Frank M.} and Boris Schr{\"o}der and Katja Tielb{\"o}rger and Lina Weiss and Kerstin Wiegand and Thorsten Wiegand and Christian Wirth and Damaris Zurell",
year = "2013",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.baae.2013.01.001",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "93--101",
journal = "Basic and Applied Ecology",
issn = "1439-1791",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How can we bring together empiricists and modellers in functional biodiversity research?

AU - Jeltsch, Florian

AU - Blaum, Niels

AU - Brose, Ulrich

AU - Chipperfield, Joseph D.

AU - Clough, Yann

AU - Farwig, Nina

AU - Geissler, Katja

AU - Graham, Catherine H.

AU - Grimm, Volker

AU - Hickler, Thomas

AU - Huth, Andreas

AU - May, Felix

AU - Meyer, Katrin M.

AU - Pagel, Jörn

AU - Reineking, Björn

AU - Rillig, Matthias C.

AU - Shea, Katriona

AU - Schurr, Frank M.

AU - Schröder, Boris

AU - Tielbörger, Katja

AU - Weiss, Lina

AU - Wiegand, Kerstin

AU - Wiegand, Thorsten

AU - Wirth, Christian

AU - Zurell, Damaris

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - Improving our understanding of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and our capacity to inform ecosystem management requires an integrated framework for functional biodiversity research (FBR). However, adequate integration among empirical approaches (monitoring and experimental) and modelling has rarely been achieved in FBR. We offer an appraisal of the issues involved and chart a course towards enhanced integration. A major element of this path is the joint orientation towards the continuous refinement of a theoretical framework for FBR that links theory testing and generalization with applied research oriented towards the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. We further emphasize existing decision-making frameworks as suitable instruments to practically merge these different aims of FBR and bring them into application. This integrated framework requires joint research planning, and should improve communication and stimulate collaboration between modellers and empiricists, thereby overcoming existing reservations and prejudices. The implementation of this integrative research agenda for FBR requires an adaptation in most national and international funding schemes in order to accommodate such joint teams and their more complex structures and data needs. © 2013 Gesellschaft für Ökologie.

AB - Improving our understanding of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and our capacity to inform ecosystem management requires an integrated framework for functional biodiversity research (FBR). However, adequate integration among empirical approaches (monitoring and experimental) and modelling has rarely been achieved in FBR. We offer an appraisal of the issues involved and chart a course towards enhanced integration. A major element of this path is the joint orientation towards the continuous refinement of a theoretical framework for FBR that links theory testing and generalization with applied research oriented towards the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. We further emphasize existing decision-making frameworks as suitable instruments to practically merge these different aims of FBR and bring them into application. This integrated framework requires joint research planning, and should improve communication and stimulate collaboration between modellers and empiricists, thereby overcoming existing reservations and prejudices. The implementation of this integrative research agenda for FBR requires an adaptation in most national and international funding schemes in order to accommodate such joint teams and their more complex structures and data needs. © 2013 Gesellschaft für Ökologie.

KW - Global change, Interdisciplinarity, Biodiversity experiments, Biodiversity theory, Conservation management, Decision-making, Ecosystem functions and services, Forecasting, Functional traits, Monitoring programmes

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Gender and Diversity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875386773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f1f9185c-5ec2-36f7-8083-31e8ce6b0d61/

U2 - 10.1016/j.baae.2013.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.baae.2013.01.001

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 14

SP - 93

EP - 101

JO - Basic and Applied Ecology

JF - Basic and Applied Ecology

SN - 1439-1791

IS - 2

ER -

DOI