From 'one right way' to 'one ruinous way'? Discursive shifts in 'There is no alternative'

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

From 'one right way' to 'one ruinous way'? Discursive shifts in 'There is no alternative'. / Séville, Astrid.

in: European Political Science Review, Jahrgang 9, Nr. 3, 01.08.2017, S. 449-470.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{88858cfbb3c8408098f236c96a120e16,
title = "From 'one right way' to 'one ruinous way'? Discursive shifts in 'There is no alternative'",
abstract = "If decisions are made in democracies in open procedures, the rhetoric of There is no alternative (TINA) raises certain questions. Tracing back the idea of necessity to symptomatic discourses, this article analyzes TINA as a political strategy in contexts such as Thatcherism, Third Way politics, and European crisis management, and sheds light on the specific characteristics of politics in the name of TINA. The analysis identifies distinct models of 'one way' discourses, reflecting political cultures and institutional settings and providing discursive trajectories. We examine the motivation for invoking necessity to justify unpalatable and normatively intricate policy decisions, and understand TINA politics in its double effect: as facilitating certain policies yet obstructing democratic and deliberative procedures. This allows us to address the question of whether the politics of our time shows a disposition to TINA as a means of responding to the rise and fall of political steering optimism.",
keywords = "crisis, discourse, necessity, neoliberalism, technocracy, Politics",
author = "Astrid S{\'e}ville",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 European Consortium for Political Research.",
year = "2017",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1755773916000035",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "449--470",
journal = "European Political Science Review",
issn = "1755-7739",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - From 'one right way' to 'one ruinous way'? Discursive shifts in 'There is no alternative'

AU - Séville, Astrid

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 European Consortium for Political Research.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - If decisions are made in democracies in open procedures, the rhetoric of There is no alternative (TINA) raises certain questions. Tracing back the idea of necessity to symptomatic discourses, this article analyzes TINA as a political strategy in contexts such as Thatcherism, Third Way politics, and European crisis management, and sheds light on the specific characteristics of politics in the name of TINA. The analysis identifies distinct models of 'one way' discourses, reflecting political cultures and institutional settings and providing discursive trajectories. We examine the motivation for invoking necessity to justify unpalatable and normatively intricate policy decisions, and understand TINA politics in its double effect: as facilitating certain policies yet obstructing democratic and deliberative procedures. This allows us to address the question of whether the politics of our time shows a disposition to TINA as a means of responding to the rise and fall of political steering optimism.

AB - If decisions are made in democracies in open procedures, the rhetoric of There is no alternative (TINA) raises certain questions. Tracing back the idea of necessity to symptomatic discourses, this article analyzes TINA as a political strategy in contexts such as Thatcherism, Third Way politics, and European crisis management, and sheds light on the specific characteristics of politics in the name of TINA. The analysis identifies distinct models of 'one way' discourses, reflecting political cultures and institutional settings and providing discursive trajectories. We examine the motivation for invoking necessity to justify unpalatable and normatively intricate policy decisions, and understand TINA politics in its double effect: as facilitating certain policies yet obstructing democratic and deliberative procedures. This allows us to address the question of whether the politics of our time shows a disposition to TINA as a means of responding to the rise and fall of political steering optimism.

KW - crisis

KW - discourse

KW - necessity

KW - neoliberalism

KW - technocracy

KW - Politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958764749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1755773916000035

DO - 10.1017/S1755773916000035

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84958764749

VL - 9

SP - 449

EP - 470

JO - European Political Science Review

JF - European Political Science Review

SN - 1755-7739

IS - 3

ER -

DOI