Evolutionary Precursors of Negation in Non-Human Reasoning

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitel

Standard

Evolutionary Precursors of Negation in Non-Human Reasoning. / Bohn, Manuel; Call, Josep; Völter, Christoph J.
The Oxford Handbook of Negation. Hrsg. / Viviane Deprez; M. Teresa Espinal. Oxford University Press, 2020. S. 577-588 (Oxford Handbooks).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitel

Harvard

Bohn, M, Call, J & Völter, CJ 2020, Evolutionary Precursors of Negation in Non-Human Reasoning. in V Deprez & MT Espinal (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Negation. Oxford Handbooks, Oxford University Press, S. 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.40

APA

Bohn, M., Call, J., & Völter, C. J. (2020). Evolutionary Precursors of Negation in Non-Human Reasoning. In V. Deprez, & M. T. Espinal (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Negation (S. 577-588). (Oxford Handbooks). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.40

Vancouver

Bohn M, Call J, Völter CJ. Evolutionary Precursors of Negation in Non-Human Reasoning. in Deprez V, Espinal MT, Hrsg., The Oxford Handbook of Negation. Oxford University Press. 2020. S. 577-588. (Oxford Handbooks). doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.40

Bibtex

@inbook{c91aea29c78541629664e395bcd1118c,
title = "Evolutionary Precursors of Negation in Non-Human Reasoning",
abstract = "Logical reasoning has been argued to crucially depend on linguistic or symbolic representations. This suggests that animals are incapable of negation. Nevertheless, animals have been found to behave in ways that suggest reasoning by negation. This chapter discusses the findings from the animal cognition literature in light of theoretical accounts of negation based on propositional and non-propositional thought. Instead of engaging in negation proper, animals might engage in proto-negation, that is reasoning based on contrary pairs instead of negated propositions. While most of the current findings might be explained in terms of proto-negation, an accumulation of evidence might eventually render negation proper a more parsimonious explanation of the evidence. The chapter concludes with suggestions for future avenues of research and a discussion of the role of negation in the evolution of human reasoning.",
keywords = "Psychology, negation, propositional thought, evolution, animal cognition, metacognition, social cognition, communication, negation, propositional thought, evolution, animal cognition, metacognition, social cognition, communication",
author = "Manuel Bohn and Josep Call and V{\"o}lter, {Christoph J.}",
year = "2020",
month = may,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.40",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780198830528",
series = "Oxford Handbooks",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
pages = "577--588",
editor = "Viviane Deprez and Espinal, {M. Teresa}",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Negation",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Evolutionary Precursors of Negation in Non-Human Reasoning

AU - Bohn, Manuel

AU - Call, Josep

AU - Völter, Christoph J.

PY - 2020/5/7

Y1 - 2020/5/7

N2 - Logical reasoning has been argued to crucially depend on linguistic or symbolic representations. This suggests that animals are incapable of negation. Nevertheless, animals have been found to behave in ways that suggest reasoning by negation. This chapter discusses the findings from the animal cognition literature in light of theoretical accounts of negation based on propositional and non-propositional thought. Instead of engaging in negation proper, animals might engage in proto-negation, that is reasoning based on contrary pairs instead of negated propositions. While most of the current findings might be explained in terms of proto-negation, an accumulation of evidence might eventually render negation proper a more parsimonious explanation of the evidence. The chapter concludes with suggestions for future avenues of research and a discussion of the role of negation in the evolution of human reasoning.

AB - Logical reasoning has been argued to crucially depend on linguistic or symbolic representations. This suggests that animals are incapable of negation. Nevertheless, animals have been found to behave in ways that suggest reasoning by negation. This chapter discusses the findings from the animal cognition literature in light of theoretical accounts of negation based on propositional and non-propositional thought. Instead of engaging in negation proper, animals might engage in proto-negation, that is reasoning based on contrary pairs instead of negated propositions. While most of the current findings might be explained in terms of proto-negation, an accumulation of evidence might eventually render negation proper a more parsimonious explanation of the evidence. The chapter concludes with suggestions for future avenues of research and a discussion of the role of negation in the evolution of human reasoning.

KW - Psychology

KW - negation

KW - propositional thought

KW - evolution

KW - animal cognition

KW - metacognition

KW - social cognition

KW - communication

KW - negation

KW - propositional thought

KW - evolution

KW - animal cognition

KW - metacognition

KW - social cognition

KW - communication

UR - https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41364/chapter-abstract/352594876?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=true

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/d8b6fd3f-416d-3686-940e-c51422e3d0c3/

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.40

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.013.40

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780198830528

T3 - Oxford Handbooks

SP - 577

EP - 588

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Negation

A2 - Deprez, Viviane

A2 - Espinal, M. Teresa

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

DOI