Environmental risk assessment of anti-cancer drugs and their transformation products: a focus on their genotoxicity characterization-state of knowledge and short comings

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6c625bfd09804216b4eca6f0e73df45d,
title = "Environmental risk assessment of anti-cancer drugs and their transformation products: a focus on their genotoxicity characterization-state of knowledge and short comings",
abstract = "Anti-cancer drugs are chemotherapeutic agents that are designed to kill or reduce proliferating cells. Often times, they interfere directly or indirectly with the cell's deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Some of these drugs can be detected in the ng/L concentration range in the aquatic environment and have the potential to be very persistent. Environmental risk assessment is available for only a few anti-cancer drugs, derived mainly from predicted data and excluding information on their metabolites and transformation products (TPs). Notably, there is no defined strategy for genotoxicity risk assessment of anti-cancer drugs, their metabolites and TPs in the environment. In fact, the presence of anti-cancer drugs in hospital and municipal wastewaters has not been clearly related to the genotoxic nature of these wastewaters. The few available studies that have sought to investigate the genotoxicity of mixtures derived from treating anti-cancer drugs prior to disposal seem to share the commonality of coupling analytical methods to measure concentration and genotoxic bioassays, namely the Ames test to monitor inactivation. Such limited studies on the environmental fate and effects of these drugs presents an area for further research work. Most importantly, there is a need to characterize the genotoxic effects of anti-cancer drugs towards aquatic organisms. Given current environmental risk assessment strategies, genotoxicity risk assessment of these drugs and their TPs would have to include a combination of appropriate analytical methods, genotoxicity bioassays, (bio) degradability and computer based prediction methods such as QSAR studies.",
keywords = "Chemistry, Anti-cancer drug, environment, Mixture toxicity, Mutagenicity, Risk Assessment, Transformation product",
author = "Toolaram, {Anju Priya} and Klaus K{\"u}mmerer and Mandy Schneider",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2014",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.mrrev.2014.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "760",
pages = "18--35",
journal = "Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis",
issn = "0027-5107",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental risk assessment of anti-cancer drugs and their transformation products

T2 - a focus on their genotoxicity characterization-state of knowledge and short comings

AU - Toolaram, Anju Priya

AU - Kümmerer, Klaus

AU - Schneider, Mandy

N1 - Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2014/4/1

Y1 - 2014/4/1

N2 - Anti-cancer drugs are chemotherapeutic agents that are designed to kill or reduce proliferating cells. Often times, they interfere directly or indirectly with the cell's deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Some of these drugs can be detected in the ng/L concentration range in the aquatic environment and have the potential to be very persistent. Environmental risk assessment is available for only a few anti-cancer drugs, derived mainly from predicted data and excluding information on their metabolites and transformation products (TPs). Notably, there is no defined strategy for genotoxicity risk assessment of anti-cancer drugs, their metabolites and TPs in the environment. In fact, the presence of anti-cancer drugs in hospital and municipal wastewaters has not been clearly related to the genotoxic nature of these wastewaters. The few available studies that have sought to investigate the genotoxicity of mixtures derived from treating anti-cancer drugs prior to disposal seem to share the commonality of coupling analytical methods to measure concentration and genotoxic bioassays, namely the Ames test to monitor inactivation. Such limited studies on the environmental fate and effects of these drugs presents an area for further research work. Most importantly, there is a need to characterize the genotoxic effects of anti-cancer drugs towards aquatic organisms. Given current environmental risk assessment strategies, genotoxicity risk assessment of these drugs and their TPs would have to include a combination of appropriate analytical methods, genotoxicity bioassays, (bio) degradability and computer based prediction methods such as QSAR studies.

AB - Anti-cancer drugs are chemotherapeutic agents that are designed to kill or reduce proliferating cells. Often times, they interfere directly or indirectly with the cell's deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Some of these drugs can be detected in the ng/L concentration range in the aquatic environment and have the potential to be very persistent. Environmental risk assessment is available for only a few anti-cancer drugs, derived mainly from predicted data and excluding information on their metabolites and transformation products (TPs). Notably, there is no defined strategy for genotoxicity risk assessment of anti-cancer drugs, their metabolites and TPs in the environment. In fact, the presence of anti-cancer drugs in hospital and municipal wastewaters has not been clearly related to the genotoxic nature of these wastewaters. The few available studies that have sought to investigate the genotoxicity of mixtures derived from treating anti-cancer drugs prior to disposal seem to share the commonality of coupling analytical methods to measure concentration and genotoxic bioassays, namely the Ames test to monitor inactivation. Such limited studies on the environmental fate and effects of these drugs presents an area for further research work. Most importantly, there is a need to characterize the genotoxic effects of anti-cancer drugs towards aquatic organisms. Given current environmental risk assessment strategies, genotoxicity risk assessment of these drugs and their TPs would have to include a combination of appropriate analytical methods, genotoxicity bioassays, (bio) degradability and computer based prediction methods such as QSAR studies.

KW - Chemistry

KW - Anti-cancer drug

KW - environment

KW - Mixture toxicity

KW - Mutagenicity

KW - Risk Assessment

KW - Transformation product

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900419090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.mrrev.2014.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.mrrev.2014.02.001

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 24556194

VL - 760

SP - 18

EP - 35

JO - Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis

JF - Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis

SN - 0027-5107

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Entrepreneurship and Aging
  2. Die heile Welt und das Böse von außen
  3. Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung nach dem Referentenentwurf eines Umsetzungsgesetzes zur CSRD
  4. H. Produktion
  5. Gehen
  6. Nachhaltigkeitsprüfungen in Kommunen
  7. Nachhaltige Kommunalverwaltung
  8. Concluding remarks: Meet the future—with International Business Administration and Entrepreneurship
  9. "Das Fenster in die Welt". Fernsehen in den fünfziger Jahren
  10. Zum Einfluss von Gleichaltrigen (Peers) auf die Persönlichkeitsentwicklung
  11. Perspektiver inden for teknologisk-assisteret indsamling af data i psykologisk forandring - rammesat af den synergetiske psykologi
  12. Role of Ca on the corrosion resistance of Mg–9Al and Mg–9Al–0.5Mn alloys
  13. Macht Mentoring aus Lehrjahren Herrenjahre?
  14. Corporate Social Responsibility
  15. Aspekte sozialer Nachhaltigkeit im Kontext der beruflichen Bildung Benachteiligter
  16. Effectiveness of gamified digital interventions in mental health prevention and health promotion among adults
  17. REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SATELLITES AND THE REALITY OF LARGE CONSTELLATIONS
  18. Einleitung : Gefühle als Atmosphären?
  19. Germany's trade in goods
  20. Germany
  21. Disaggregating ecosystem services and disservices in the cultural landscapes of southwestern Ethiopia
  22. Pollination of Camelina sativa and Thlaspi arvense: Two new potential oil crop species in Germany
  23. Mediatisierte Praktiken der kollektiven Anteilnahme im Fokus metapragmatischer Kritik
  24. Can the German Electricity Market Benefit from the EU Enlargement?
  25. Ästhetiken des Widerstands - Literatur und Sprache in politischen Prozessen des deutschsprachigen und des arabischen Raums
  26. Prävention von Bullying im Kontext von psychischer Gesundheitsförderung und Qualitätsentwicklung in der Schule
  27. Einführung in das Politikfeld Agro-Gentechnik
  28. Verantwortung kommt mit Nähe