Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective?

Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und BerichteArbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere

Standard

Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective? / Newig, Jens; Fritsch, Oliver.
Leipzig: Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung, UFZ, 2008. S. 1-26 (UFZ-Diskussionspapiere; Band 2008, Nr. 15).

Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und BerichteArbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere

Harvard

Newig, J & Fritsch, O 2008 'Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective?' UFZ-Diskussionspapiere, Nr. 15, Bd. 2008, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung, UFZ, Leipzig, S. 1-26.

APA

Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2008). Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective? (S. 1-26). (UFZ-Diskussionspapiere; Band 2008, Nr. 15). Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung, UFZ.

Vancouver

Newig J, Fritsch O. Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective? Leipzig: Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung, UFZ. 2008 Nov, S. 1-26. (UFZ-Diskussionspapiere; 15).

Bibtex

@techreport{cd1ad0914ec34574a69059d4b49aceaa,
title = "Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective?",
abstract = "Current international and European Union environmental policies increasingly promote collaborative and participatory decision-making on appropriate and multiple governance levels as a means to attain more sustainable policies and a more effective and lasting policy implementation. The entailed shifts of geographical scale of governance can be exemplified by the EU Water Framework Directive in that higher-level policies are devolved not only to the member states but to local collaborative decision-making bodies on natural as opposed to territorial scales. To date, empirical evidence and theoretical considerations have remained ambiguous about the environmental outcomes of such modes of governance. At the same time, the relationship between multi-level governance and non-state actor involvement remains a largely uncharted terrain ...",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Communication, civic participation, multi-level governance, re-scaling, policy implementation, instiutional fit, meta-analysis, case survey, civic participation, multi-level governance, re-scaling, policy implementation, institutional fit, meta-analysis, case survey",
author = "Jens Newig and Oliver Fritsch",
note = "Literaturverz. S. 22 - 26",
year = "2008",
month = nov,
language = "English",
series = "UFZ-Diskussionspapiere",
publisher = "Helmholtz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Umweltforschung, UFZ",
number = "15",
pages = "1--26",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Helmholtz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Umweltforschung, UFZ",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Environmental governance

T2 - participatory, multi-level - and effective?

AU - Newig, Jens

AU - Fritsch, Oliver

N1 - Literaturverz. S. 22 - 26

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Current international and European Union environmental policies increasingly promote collaborative and participatory decision-making on appropriate and multiple governance levels as a means to attain more sustainable policies and a more effective and lasting policy implementation. The entailed shifts of geographical scale of governance can be exemplified by the EU Water Framework Directive in that higher-level policies are devolved not only to the member states but to local collaborative decision-making bodies on natural as opposed to territorial scales. To date, empirical evidence and theoretical considerations have remained ambiguous about the environmental outcomes of such modes of governance. At the same time, the relationship between multi-level governance and non-state actor involvement remains a largely uncharted terrain ...

AB - Current international and European Union environmental policies increasingly promote collaborative and participatory decision-making on appropriate and multiple governance levels as a means to attain more sustainable policies and a more effective and lasting policy implementation. The entailed shifts of geographical scale of governance can be exemplified by the EU Water Framework Directive in that higher-level policies are devolved not only to the member states but to local collaborative decision-making bodies on natural as opposed to territorial scales. To date, empirical evidence and theoretical considerations have remained ambiguous about the environmental outcomes of such modes of governance. At the same time, the relationship between multi-level governance and non-state actor involvement remains a largely uncharted terrain ...

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

KW - civic participation

KW - multi-level governance

KW - re-scaling

KW - policy implementation

KW - instiutional fit

KW - meta-analysis

KW - case survey

KW - civic participation

KW - multi-level governance

KW - re-scaling

KW - policy implementation

KW - institutional fit

KW - meta-analysis

KW - case survey

M3 - Working papers

T3 - UFZ-Diskussionspapiere

SP - 1

EP - 26

BT - Environmental governance

PB - Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung, UFZ

CY - Leipzig

ER -

Dokumente