Ecological-economic modeling for biodiversity management: potential, pitfalls, and prospects

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

Ecological-economic modeling for biodiversity management: potential, pitfalls, and prospects. / Wätzold, Frank; Drechsler, Martin; Armstrong, Claire W. et al.
in: Conservation Biology, Jahrgang 20, Nr. 4, 08.2006, S. 1034-1041.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

Wätzold, F, Drechsler, M, Armstrong, CW, Baumgärtner, S, Grimm, V, Huth, A, Perrings, C, Possingham, HP, Shogren, JF, Skonhoft, A, Verboom-Vasiljev, J & Wissel, C 2006, 'Ecological-economic modeling for biodiversity management: potential, pitfalls, and prospects', Conservation Biology, Jg. 20, Nr. 4, S. 1034-1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00353.x

APA

Wätzold, F., Drechsler, M., Armstrong, C. W., Baumgärtner, S., Grimm, V., Huth, A., Perrings, C., Possingham, H. P., Shogren, J. F., Skonhoft, A., Verboom-Vasiljev, J., & Wissel, C. (2006). Ecological-economic modeling for biodiversity management: potential, pitfalls, and prospects. Conservation Biology, 20(4), 1034-1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00353.x

Vancouver

Wätzold F, Drechsler M, Armstrong CW, Baumgärtner S, Grimm V, Huth A et al. Ecological-economic modeling for biodiversity management: potential, pitfalls, and prospects. Conservation Biology. 2006 Aug;20(4):1034-1041. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00353.x

Bibtex

@article{c85bd4408ae64408a3ad423f655663e1,
title = "Ecological-economic modeling for biodiversity management: potential, pitfalls, and prospects",
abstract = "Ecologists and economists both use models to help develop strategies for biodiversity management. The practical use of disciplinary models, however, can be limited because ecological models tend not to address the socioeconomic dimension of biodiversity management, whereas economic models tend to neglect the ecological dimension. Given these shortcomings of disciplinary models, there is a necessity to combine ecological and economic knowledge into ecological-economic models. It is insufficient if scientists work separately in their own disciplines and combine their knowledge only when it comes to formulating management recommendations. Such an approach does not capture feedback loops between the ecological and the socioeconomic systems. Furthermore, each discipline poses the management problem in its own way and comes up with its own most appropriate solution. These disciplinary solutions, however, are likely to be so different that a combined solution considering aspects of both disciplines cannot be found. Preconditions for a successful model-based integration of ecology and economics include (1) an in-depth knowledge of the two disciplines, (2) the adequate identification and framing of the problem to be investigated, and (3) a common understanding between economists and ecologists of modeling and scale. To further advance ecological-economic modeling the development of common benchmarks, quality controls, and refereeing standards for ecological-economic models is desirable.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, biodiversity management, conservation, economics, interdisciplinary research, Economics, biodiversity management, conservation, economics, interdisciplinary research",
author = "Frank W{\"a}tzold and Martin Drechsler and Armstrong, {Claire W.} and Stefan Baumg{\"a}rtner and Volker Grimm and Andreas Huth and Charles Perrings and Possingham, {Hugh P.} and Shogren, {Jason F.} and Anders Skonhoft and Jana Verboom-Vasiljev and Christian Wissel",
year = "2006",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00353.x",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1034--1041",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecological-economic modeling for biodiversity management

T2 - potential, pitfalls, and prospects

AU - Wätzold, Frank

AU - Drechsler, Martin

AU - Armstrong, Claire W.

AU - Baumgärtner, Stefan

AU - Grimm, Volker

AU - Huth, Andreas

AU - Perrings, Charles

AU - Possingham, Hugh P.

AU - Shogren, Jason F.

AU - Skonhoft, Anders

AU - Verboom-Vasiljev, Jana

AU - Wissel, Christian

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - Ecologists and economists both use models to help develop strategies for biodiversity management. The practical use of disciplinary models, however, can be limited because ecological models tend not to address the socioeconomic dimension of biodiversity management, whereas economic models tend to neglect the ecological dimension. Given these shortcomings of disciplinary models, there is a necessity to combine ecological and economic knowledge into ecological-economic models. It is insufficient if scientists work separately in their own disciplines and combine their knowledge only when it comes to formulating management recommendations. Such an approach does not capture feedback loops between the ecological and the socioeconomic systems. Furthermore, each discipline poses the management problem in its own way and comes up with its own most appropriate solution. These disciplinary solutions, however, are likely to be so different that a combined solution considering aspects of both disciplines cannot be found. Preconditions for a successful model-based integration of ecology and economics include (1) an in-depth knowledge of the two disciplines, (2) the adequate identification and framing of the problem to be investigated, and (3) a common understanding between economists and ecologists of modeling and scale. To further advance ecological-economic modeling the development of common benchmarks, quality controls, and refereeing standards for ecological-economic models is desirable.

AB - Ecologists and economists both use models to help develop strategies for biodiversity management. The practical use of disciplinary models, however, can be limited because ecological models tend not to address the socioeconomic dimension of biodiversity management, whereas economic models tend to neglect the ecological dimension. Given these shortcomings of disciplinary models, there is a necessity to combine ecological and economic knowledge into ecological-economic models. It is insufficient if scientists work separately in their own disciplines and combine their knowledge only when it comes to formulating management recommendations. Such an approach does not capture feedback loops between the ecological and the socioeconomic systems. Furthermore, each discipline poses the management problem in its own way and comes up with its own most appropriate solution. These disciplinary solutions, however, are likely to be so different that a combined solution considering aspects of both disciplines cannot be found. Preconditions for a successful model-based integration of ecology and economics include (1) an in-depth knowledge of the two disciplines, (2) the adequate identification and framing of the problem to be investigated, and (3) a common understanding between economists and ecologists of modeling and scale. To further advance ecological-economic modeling the development of common benchmarks, quality controls, and refereeing standards for ecological-economic models is desirable.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - biodiversity management

KW - conservation

KW - economics

KW - interdisciplinary research

KW - Economics

KW - biodiversity management

KW - conservation

KW - economics

KW - interdisciplinary research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746354009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f1fbf28c-909a-37ff-8ede-62c515e80380/

U2 - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00353.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00353.x

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 20

SP - 1034

EP - 1041

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 4

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Europe and the media: Changing structures in a changing context
  2. Determiner Ellipsis in Electronic Writing - Discourse or Syntax?
  3. Management als Bündel aus Praktiken, Diskursen und Technologien
  4. Collaboration and Open Science Initiatives in Primate Research
  5. Survey on challenges of Question Answering in the Semantic Web
  6. Unterrichtsentwicklung: Was einen guten Unterricht kennzeichnet.
  7. Demokratie und Differenz - Ein Beispiel, Demokratie zu gestalten
  8. Estimation of spatial distribution of wet deposition in Germany
  9. Symbolische und pikturale Wirksamkeit bei Lévi-Strauss und Lacan
  10. The influence of Reputation on Travel Decisions in the Internet
  11. Emotionen, Anerkennung und Macht in stationären Erziehungshilfen
  12. Metaphorik im kommunikationsbereich der sportfachsprachlichkeit
  13. Ingenieurökologische Sanierungsansätze für den Bederkesaer See
  14. The debate about technique in the Kunstwissenschaft around 1900
  15. Greene’s dual-process moral psychology and the modularity of mind
  16. Aufgaben- und Rollenpluralität des beruflichen Bildungspersonals
  17. Erziehungswissenschaftliche Alternativen im Pädagogikunterricht
  18. Sprachensensibles Kompetenzmodell wissenschaftlichen Schreibens
  19. Fiskalpolitische Maßgeblichkeit bei der Rückstellungsbewertung?
  20. REACH and the Role of Stakeholders in its Socio-Economic Analysis
  21. Erweitere Handlungsspielräume im Bereich der Jugendgerichtshilfe
  22. Building a Coalition with Depoliticized Sustainability Discourse
  23. Kinder- und Jugendliteratur in der Ausbildung von Englischlehrern
  24. Parlamentarismus vor dem Hintergrund der europäischen Integration
  25. Feldstudie zur Entwicklung der Rechenfertigkeit von Erstklässlern.
  26. Auswirkungen der Wärmespeicherung auf die Mikroflora in Aquiferen.
  27. Developing shaping competence in informal setting at universities
  28. Digitale, hochschulübergreifende Vernetzung durch Virtual Exchange
  29. Steuerliche Folgen der Wohnsitzverlegung bei natürlichen Personen
  30. Wie trägt die Berufsbildung zu einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung bei?
  31. Hans Ehrenbaum-Degele: 'Das tausendste Regiment' und andere Dichtungen
  32. Sachunterricht: Innovatives Lernen für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung
  33. In the Workshop of the Translator. Walter Benjamin in/on Translation
  34. Legitimacy and Institutional Change in International Organisations
  35. Überlegungen zur analytischen Fallbeschreibung in der Sozialarbeit
  36. Exports and firm Characteristics in German manufacturing industries