Credibility, information preferences, and information interests

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Credibility, information preferences, and information interests. / Jungermann, Helmut; Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger; Fischer, Katrin.
in: Risk Analysis, Jahrgang 16, Nr. 2, 01.04.1996, S. 251-261.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Jungermann H, Pfister HR, Fischer K. Credibility, information preferences, and information interests. Risk Analysis. 1996 Apr 1;16(2):251-261. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01455.x

Bibtex

@article{4fc92dec81694d11a4936d2ace9cbeb6,
title = "Credibility, information preferences, and information interests",
abstract = "The Seveso Directive of the European Union demands that information be provided to the public by companies and authorities about facts, risks, and behaviors related to hazardous facilities, in particular chemical facilities. On behalf of the Commission of the European Communities, a survey was run in five European countries on the credibility of various information sources. This article describes the results of the German study. 430 persons were interviewed with a questionnaire of 50 items, in particular about their perceptions and evaluations of technical risks, the credibility of sources of information about chemical risks, their preferences for receiving risk information from these sources, and their interests in receiving information. Major findings are great differences in credibility, differentiated information preferences, and strong information interests. Surprisingly, credibility played only a minor role with regard to the respondents{\textquoteright}information preferences and interests.",
keywords = "Business psychology",
author = "Helmut Jungermann and Hans-R{\"u}diger Pfister and Katrin Fischer",
year = "1996",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01455.x",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "251--261",
journal = "Risk Analysis",
issn = "1539-6924",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Credibility, information preferences, and information interests

AU - Jungermann, Helmut

AU - Pfister, Hans-Rüdiger

AU - Fischer, Katrin

PY - 1996/4/1

Y1 - 1996/4/1

N2 - The Seveso Directive of the European Union demands that information be provided to the public by companies and authorities about facts, risks, and behaviors related to hazardous facilities, in particular chemical facilities. On behalf of the Commission of the European Communities, a survey was run in five European countries on the credibility of various information sources. This article describes the results of the German study. 430 persons were interviewed with a questionnaire of 50 items, in particular about their perceptions and evaluations of technical risks, the credibility of sources of information about chemical risks, their preferences for receiving risk information from these sources, and their interests in receiving information. Major findings are great differences in credibility, differentiated information preferences, and strong information interests. Surprisingly, credibility played only a minor role with regard to the respondents’information preferences and interests.

AB - The Seveso Directive of the European Union demands that information be provided to the public by companies and authorities about facts, risks, and behaviors related to hazardous facilities, in particular chemical facilities. On behalf of the Commission of the European Communities, a survey was run in five European countries on the credibility of various information sources. This article describes the results of the German study. 430 persons were interviewed with a questionnaire of 50 items, in particular about their perceptions and evaluations of technical risks, the credibility of sources of information about chemical risks, their preferences for receiving risk information from these sources, and their interests in receiving information. Major findings are great differences in credibility, differentiated information preferences, and strong information interests. Surprisingly, credibility played only a minor role with regard to the respondents’information preferences and interests.

KW - Business psychology

U2 - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01455.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01455.x

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 16

SP - 251

EP - 261

JO - Risk Analysis

JF - Risk Analysis

SN - 1539-6924

IS - 2

ER -

DOI