1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. Consumer response to monochrome Guidelin...
  6. Formate
  7. //

Consumer response to monochrome Guideline Daily Amount nutrition labels

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Consumer response to monochrome Guideline Daily Amount nutrition labels. / Boztuğ, Yasemin; Juhl, Hans Jørn; Elshiewy, Ossama et al.
in: Food Policy, Jahrgang 53, 01.05.2015, S. 1-8.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Boztuğ, Y, Juhl, HJ, Elshiewy, O & Jensen, MB 2015, 'Consumer response to monochrome Guideline Daily Amount nutrition labels', Food Policy, Jg. 53, S. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.03.002

APA

Boztuğ, Y., Juhl, H. J., Elshiewy, O., & Jensen, M. B. (2015). Consumer response to monochrome Guideline Daily Amount nutrition labels. Food Policy, 53, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.03.002

Vancouver

Boztuğ Y, Juhl HJ, Elshiewy O, Jensen MB. Consumer response to monochrome Guideline Daily Amount nutrition labels. Food Policy. 2015 Mai 1;53:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.03.002

Bibtex

@article{97e281a5fd5b4c04a80a118a3a84d59d,
title = "Consumer response to monochrome Guideline Daily Amount nutrition labels",
abstract = "Front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labelling has received extensive political attention in recent years. Most studies assessing the influence of nutrition labelling focus on consumer attention to labels, while few concentrate on its effects on actual purchase behaviour. In this study, we present results from an analysis of scanner data provided by a large UK retailer. We focus on two food categories, using store-brand products that are labelled with a front-of-pack, monochrome Guideline Daily Amount (GDA) nutrition label. The analyses are based on models at both an aggregated and disaggregated level to enable us to identify as many influencing factors on food choice as possible. We utilize the SSAg/1 health score for our food categories as a dependent variable to obtain an objective measure of healthiness.Our results suggest that the GDA label introduction reduces attraction of unhealthier products in terms of market share but does not affect product choice behaviour. Instead, price and habit exhibit a greater impact on purchase behaviour and product choice than the GDA label introduction.",
keywords = "Front-of-pack nutrition labelling, GDA, Purchase behaviour, Scanner panel data, Management studies",
author = "Yasemin Boztuğ and Juhl, {Hans J{\o}rn} and Ossama Elshiewy and Jensen, {Morten Berg}",
year = "2015",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.03.002",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Food Policy",
issn = "0306-9192",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consumer response to monochrome Guideline Daily Amount nutrition labels

AU - Boztuğ, Yasemin

AU - Juhl, Hans Jørn

AU - Elshiewy, Ossama

AU - Jensen, Morten Berg

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labelling has received extensive political attention in recent years. Most studies assessing the influence of nutrition labelling focus on consumer attention to labels, while few concentrate on its effects on actual purchase behaviour. In this study, we present results from an analysis of scanner data provided by a large UK retailer. We focus on two food categories, using store-brand products that are labelled with a front-of-pack, monochrome Guideline Daily Amount (GDA) nutrition label. The analyses are based on models at both an aggregated and disaggregated level to enable us to identify as many influencing factors on food choice as possible. We utilize the SSAg/1 health score for our food categories as a dependent variable to obtain an objective measure of healthiness.Our results suggest that the GDA label introduction reduces attraction of unhealthier products in terms of market share but does not affect product choice behaviour. Instead, price and habit exhibit a greater impact on purchase behaviour and product choice than the GDA label introduction.

AB - Front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labelling has received extensive political attention in recent years. Most studies assessing the influence of nutrition labelling focus on consumer attention to labels, while few concentrate on its effects on actual purchase behaviour. In this study, we present results from an analysis of scanner data provided by a large UK retailer. We focus on two food categories, using store-brand products that are labelled with a front-of-pack, monochrome Guideline Daily Amount (GDA) nutrition label. The analyses are based on models at both an aggregated and disaggregated level to enable us to identify as many influencing factors on food choice as possible. We utilize the SSAg/1 health score for our food categories as a dependent variable to obtain an objective measure of healthiness.Our results suggest that the GDA label introduction reduces attraction of unhealthier products in terms of market share but does not affect product choice behaviour. Instead, price and habit exhibit a greater impact on purchase behaviour and product choice than the GDA label introduction.

KW - Front-of-pack nutrition labelling

KW - GDA

KW - Purchase behaviour

KW - Scanner panel data

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961308149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.03.002

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84961308149

VL - 53

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Food Policy

JF - Food Policy

SN - 0306-9192

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. “The Secret is to Look Good on Paper”
  2. The longitudinal prediction of costs due to health care uptake and productivity losses in a cohort of employees with and without depression or anxiety.
  3. Mitarbeiter als Erlebnisprovider
  4. Einleitung
  5. The link between supervisory board reporting and firm performance in Germany and Austria
  6. Pluralisierung von Leitbildern - die Lebensentwürfe junger Singles
  7. The defence of necessity
  8. Who benefits from indirect prevention and treatment of depression using an online intervention for insomnia?
  9. Center for the Study of Democracy at Leuphana University Lüneburg
  10. Historii nelze rolišit od jejího zobrazení
  11. THE RADICAL ROLE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN POLITICAL IMAGINATION AND PRODUCTION OF COMMON FUTURE IN BELARUSIAN PROTESTS
  12. Effects of the Neuro-Turn
  13. Flexible transitions from work to retirement in Germany
  14. "Gute Kinder schlechter Eltern"
  15. Entwicklung eines Interviewleitfadens
  16. Krise der Kunstkritik?
  17. Financial Fragility and the Control of Credit
  18. Green chemistry, sustainable agriculture and processing systems
  19. Courbets Zweifel an der Verlässlichkeit des Sehsinns
  20. Werkzeugkiste: 26. Action Learning (AL)
  21. White-Indian Relations
  22. Social Entrepreneurship – Altes Phänomen, neues Paradigma moderner Gesellschaften oder Vorbote eines Kapitalismus 2.0?
  23. Bildung in Bildern
  24. Philosophie der Zeugenschaft
  25. The struggles of Malaysian media and environmental non-governmental organisations (ENGOs) in communicating the environment within semi-democratic nation
  26. Corrigendum to "Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options"
  27. § 290 Verzinsung des Wertersatzes
  28. Valorization of organic residues for the production of added value chemicals