Artificial intelligence in higher education: exploring faculty use, self-efficacy, distinct profiles, and professional development needs
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, Jahrgang 21, Nr. 1, 58, 12.2024.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial intelligence in higher education
T2 - exploring faculty use, self-efficacy, distinct profiles, and professional development needs
AU - Mah, Dana-Kristin
AU - Groß, Nele
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Faculty perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education are crucial for AI’s meaningful integration into teaching and learning, yet research is scarce. This paper presents a study designed to gain insight into faculty members’ (N = 122) AI self-efficacy and distinct latent profiles, perceived benefits, challenges, use, and professional development needs related to AI. The respondents saw greater equity in education as AI’s greatest benefit, while students and faculty members’ lack of AI literacy was among the greatest challenges, with the majority interested in professional development. Latent class analysis revealed four distinct faculty member profiles: optimistic, critical, critically reflected, and neutral. The optimistic profile moderates the relationship between self-efficacy and usage. The development of adequate support services is suggested for successful and sustainable digital transformation.
AB - Faculty perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education are crucial for AI’s meaningful integration into teaching and learning, yet research is scarce. This paper presents a study designed to gain insight into faculty members’ (N = 122) AI self-efficacy and distinct latent profiles, perceived benefits, challenges, use, and professional development needs related to AI. The respondents saw greater equity in education as AI’s greatest benefit, while students and faculty members’ lack of AI literacy was among the greatest challenges, with the majority interested in professional development. Latent class analysis revealed four distinct faculty member profiles: optimistic, critical, critically reflected, and neutral. The optimistic profile moderates the relationship between self-efficacy and usage. The development of adequate support services is suggested for successful and sustainable digital transformation.
KW - Educational science
KW - AI self-efficacy
KW - AI literacy
KW - Artificial intelligence in higher education
KW - Faculty perspective
KW - Digital transformation
KW - Latent class analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207292318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e8fc9451-4bf7-30ea-99f8-4e7ff30067e1/
U2 - 10.1186/s41239-024-00490-1
DO - 10.1186/s41239-024-00490-1
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 21
JO - International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
JF - International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
SN - 1698-580X
IS - 1
M1 - 58
ER -