Applicability of the European Commission's framework on safe and sustainable by design to the pharmaceutical sector

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Applicability of the European Commission's framework on safe and sustainable by design to the pharmaceutical sector. / Puhlmann, Neele; Abbate, Elisabetta; Kümmerer, Klaus et al.
in: Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, Jahrgang 42, 101845, 12.2024.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b5106c27641a48188656e2dd92785d57,
title = "Applicability of the European Commission's framework on safe and sustainable by design to the pharmaceutical sector",
abstract = "The chemical sector contributes significantly to anthropogenic impacts on planetary health. Thus, there is a need for a green transformation. The same holds for the pharmaceutical sector. To assist with this transformation, European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) developed a framework on Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) for chemicals and materials (“SSbD framework”). The general structure of the SSbD framework leaves room for sector-specific priorities and practices. This study explores the applicability of the SSbD framework to the pharmaceutical sector; more specifically to the development, production and use of Human Medicinal Products (HMPs). We show that the stage-gate process in R&D of HMPs fits very well with the design-assessment process of the SSbD framework, making the framework conceptually applicable to pharmaceutical R&D. Future efforts should focus on the development of i) methods to predict environmental safety and sustainability based on the limited data available during R&D, ii) a pragmatic procedure integrating SSbD into HMPs innovation, and iii) a weighing system considering also environmental safety and sustainability parameters alongside patient safety and medical efficacy. Although the assessment phase of the JRC's SSbD framework has specifically been developed for innovation purposes, we propose an expansion of its scope to pharmaceutical products already on the market. The reason is its applicability by healthcare actors to guide safer and more sustainable choices regarding the use of marketed HMPs. We call this approach Safe and Sustainable by Comparison (SSbC) and show that the assessment principles of the SSbD framework can be applied to SSbC.",
keywords = "Green, Health, Innovation, Lifecyle, Chemistry, Higher Education and Science Management",
author = "Neele Puhlmann and Elisabetta Abbate and Klaus K{\"u}mmerer and Oomen, {Agnes G.} and Ragas, {Ad M.J.} and Caroline Moermond",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors",
year = "2024",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.scp.2024.101845",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
journal = "Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy",
issn = "2352-5541",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applicability of the European Commission's framework on safe and sustainable by design to the pharmaceutical sector

AU - Puhlmann, Neele

AU - Abbate, Elisabetta

AU - Kümmerer, Klaus

AU - Oomen, Agnes G.

AU - Ragas, Ad M.J.

AU - Moermond, Caroline

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors

PY - 2024/12

Y1 - 2024/12

N2 - The chemical sector contributes significantly to anthropogenic impacts on planetary health. Thus, there is a need for a green transformation. The same holds for the pharmaceutical sector. To assist with this transformation, European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) developed a framework on Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) for chemicals and materials (“SSbD framework”). The general structure of the SSbD framework leaves room for sector-specific priorities and practices. This study explores the applicability of the SSbD framework to the pharmaceutical sector; more specifically to the development, production and use of Human Medicinal Products (HMPs). We show that the stage-gate process in R&D of HMPs fits very well with the design-assessment process of the SSbD framework, making the framework conceptually applicable to pharmaceutical R&D. Future efforts should focus on the development of i) methods to predict environmental safety and sustainability based on the limited data available during R&D, ii) a pragmatic procedure integrating SSbD into HMPs innovation, and iii) a weighing system considering also environmental safety and sustainability parameters alongside patient safety and medical efficacy. Although the assessment phase of the JRC's SSbD framework has specifically been developed for innovation purposes, we propose an expansion of its scope to pharmaceutical products already on the market. The reason is its applicability by healthcare actors to guide safer and more sustainable choices regarding the use of marketed HMPs. We call this approach Safe and Sustainable by Comparison (SSbC) and show that the assessment principles of the SSbD framework can be applied to SSbC.

AB - The chemical sector contributes significantly to anthropogenic impacts on planetary health. Thus, there is a need for a green transformation. The same holds for the pharmaceutical sector. To assist with this transformation, European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) developed a framework on Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) for chemicals and materials (“SSbD framework”). The general structure of the SSbD framework leaves room for sector-specific priorities and practices. This study explores the applicability of the SSbD framework to the pharmaceutical sector; more specifically to the development, production and use of Human Medicinal Products (HMPs). We show that the stage-gate process in R&D of HMPs fits very well with the design-assessment process of the SSbD framework, making the framework conceptually applicable to pharmaceutical R&D. Future efforts should focus on the development of i) methods to predict environmental safety and sustainability based on the limited data available during R&D, ii) a pragmatic procedure integrating SSbD into HMPs innovation, and iii) a weighing system considering also environmental safety and sustainability parameters alongside patient safety and medical efficacy. Although the assessment phase of the JRC's SSbD framework has specifically been developed for innovation purposes, we propose an expansion of its scope to pharmaceutical products already on the market. The reason is its applicability by healthcare actors to guide safer and more sustainable choices regarding the use of marketed HMPs. We call this approach Safe and Sustainable by Comparison (SSbC) and show that the assessment principles of the SSbD framework can be applied to SSbC.

KW - Green

KW - Health

KW - Innovation

KW - Lifecyle

KW - Chemistry

KW - Higher Education and Science Management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208686547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9f0eff34-4955-3901-a23f-f8e601e66d54/

U2 - 10.1016/j.scp.2024.101845

DO - 10.1016/j.scp.2024.101845

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85208686547

VL - 42

JO - Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy

JF - Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy

SN - 2352-5541

M1 - 101845

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Naturschutzansprüche und ihre Durchsetzung
  2. Der Leseunterricht aus der Sicht der Lehrkräfte
  3. Different Subcultures in Residential Groups in Germany – Implications for Participation and the Victimization of Children and Young People
  4. Reflexionen über eine strategiegetriebene, adaptive Budgetierung
  5. Metaphilologisches Erzählen
  6. Diesseits von Abbild und Vorbild
  7. Cultural geographies of coastal change
  8. Interkulturelle Narration. Zur Theorie und Praxis der Analyse und Interpretation - am Beispiel einer Palästina-Reportage von Richard A. Bermann
  9. Variational Pragmatics
  10. Die zweite Haager Konferenz und das Recht der friedlichen Streitbeilegung
  11. Cosmopolitan cities
  12. Medienästhetik
  13. Verbesserung des deutschen Corporate-Governance-Systems durch eine Kompetenzerweiterung von Prüfungsausschüssen des Aufsichtsrats?
  14. Poetik der Assimilation
  15. Boom, bust and recovery? Arts audience development in Germany between 1980 and 1996
  16. Sustainable consumption communication
  17. Spatial distribution models in a frugivorous carnivore, the stone marten (Martes foina)
  18. A Road to Conflict
  19. Entwicklung und Zukunft der Sexualität und Liebe
  20. Grundwissen Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
  21. Response to Turnhout et al.’s rethinking biodiversity: From goods and services to “living with”
  22. Bewältigung von Nicht-Anerkennung
  23. Zur Vergeschlechtlichung Sozialer Arbeit im post-wohlfahrtsstaatlichen Kontext
  24. Leadership made in Germany
  25. In Hochrisikoländern arbeiten
  26. INTER-CHARITY COMPETITION AND EFFICIENCY
  27. Solid state recycling of different chip types of aluminum alloy 6060 by hot extrusion