Analyzing Talk and Text II: Thematic Analysis

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in SammelwerkenForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Analyzing Talk and Text II: Thematic Analysis. / Herzog, Christian; Handke, Christian; Hitters, Erik .
The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. Hrsg. / Hilde Van den Bulck; Manuel Puppis; Karen Donders; Leo Van Audenhove. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. S. 385-401.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in SammelwerkenForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Herzog, C, Handke, C & Hitters, E 2019, Analyzing Talk and Text II: Thematic Analysis. in H Van den Bulck, M Puppis, K Donders & L Van Audenhove (Hrsg.), The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, S. 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_22

APA

Herzog, C., Handke, C., & Hitters, E. (2019). Analyzing Talk and Text II: Thematic Analysis. In H. Van den Bulck, M. Puppis, K. Donders, & L. Van Audenhove (Hrsg.), The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research (S. 385-401). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_22

Vancouver

Herzog C, Handke C, Hitters E. Analyzing Talk and Text II: Thematic Analysis. in Van den Bulck H, Puppis M, Donders K, Van Audenhove L, Hrsg., The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 2019. S. 385-401 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_22

Bibtex

@inbook{851b0169808c4a81b9a0d107cad3c1dd,
title = "Analyzing Talk and Text II: Thematic Analysis",
abstract = "Thematic analysis (TA) is a popular and foundational method of analyzing qualitative policy data. It is concerned with the identification and analysis of patterns of meaning (themes) and constitutes a widely applicable, cost-effective and flexible tool for exploratory research. More generally, it constitutes a cornerstone of qualitative data analysis. Drawing principally on Braun and Clarke{\textquoteright}s (2013, 2006) work, the chapter outlines when the use of this method is suitable and makes practical suggestions about how to plan and conduct TA research. Few policy studies employing TA contain a transparent discussion of research methods. This chapter stresses the importance of research transparency and methodological reflexivity: researchers should not only document what they do; they should also explicitly argue how and why they opted for specific methods and discuss implications for future empirical research.",
keywords = "Media and communication studies, Empirical education research",
author = "Christian Herzog and Christian Handke and Erik Hitters",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_22",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-030-16064-7",
pages = "385--401",
editor = "{Van den Bulck}, Hilde and Manuel Puppis and Donders, {Karen } and {Van Audenhove}, Leo",
booktitle = "The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
address = "Switzerland",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Analyzing Talk and Text II: Thematic Analysis

AU - Herzog, Christian

AU - Handke, Christian

AU - Hitters, Erik

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Thematic analysis (TA) is a popular and foundational method of analyzing qualitative policy data. It is concerned with the identification and analysis of patterns of meaning (themes) and constitutes a widely applicable, cost-effective and flexible tool for exploratory research. More generally, it constitutes a cornerstone of qualitative data analysis. Drawing principally on Braun and Clarke’s (2013, 2006) work, the chapter outlines when the use of this method is suitable and makes practical suggestions about how to plan and conduct TA research. Few policy studies employing TA contain a transparent discussion of research methods. This chapter stresses the importance of research transparency and methodological reflexivity: researchers should not only document what they do; they should also explicitly argue how and why they opted for specific methods and discuss implications for future empirical research.

AB - Thematic analysis (TA) is a popular and foundational method of analyzing qualitative policy data. It is concerned with the identification and analysis of patterns of meaning (themes) and constitutes a widely applicable, cost-effective and flexible tool for exploratory research. More generally, it constitutes a cornerstone of qualitative data analysis. Drawing principally on Braun and Clarke’s (2013, 2006) work, the chapter outlines when the use of this method is suitable and makes practical suggestions about how to plan and conduct TA research. Few policy studies employing TA contain a transparent discussion of research methods. This chapter stresses the importance of research transparency and methodological reflexivity: researchers should not only document what they do; they should also explicitly argue how and why they opted for specific methods and discuss implications for future empirical research.

KW - Media and communication studies

KW - Empirical education research

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/30f2399f-6bfa-383d-ab34-327b1b7b84fd/

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_22

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_22

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 978-3-030-16064-7

SP - 385

EP - 401

BT - The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research

A2 - Van den Bulck, Hilde

A2 - Puppis, Manuel

A2 - Donders, Karen

A2 - Van Audenhove, Leo

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - Cham

ER -

DOI