TY - JOUR

T1 - A qualitative analysis of virtual patient descriptions in healthcare education based on a systematic literature review

AU - Hege, Inga

AU - Kononowicz, Andrzej A.

AU - Tolks, Daniel

AU - Edelbring, Samuel

AU - Kuehlmeyer, Katja

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 Hege et al.

PY - 2016/5/13

Y1 - 2016/5/13

N2 - Background: Virtual Patients (VPs) have been in the focus of research in healthcare education for many years. The aim of our study was to analyze how virtual patients are described in the healthcare education literature, and how the identified concepts relate to each other. Methods: We performed a literature review and extracted 185 descriptions of virtual patients from the articles. In a qualitative content analysis approach we inductively-deductively developed categories and deducted subcategories. We constructed a concept map to illustrate these concepts and their interrelations. Results: We developed the following five main categories: Patient, Teacher, Virtual Patient, Curriculum, and Learner. The concept map includes these categories and highlights aspects such as the under-valued role of patients in shaping their virtual representation and opposing concepts, such as standardization of learner activity versus learner-centeredness. Conclusions: The presented concept map synthesizes VP descriptions and serves as a basis for both, VP use and discussions of research topics related to virtual patients.

AB - Background: Virtual Patients (VPs) have been in the focus of research in healthcare education for many years. The aim of our study was to analyze how virtual patients are described in the healthcare education literature, and how the identified concepts relate to each other. Methods: We performed a literature review and extracted 185 descriptions of virtual patients from the articles. In a qualitative content analysis approach we inductively-deductively developed categories and deducted subcategories. We constructed a concept map to illustrate these concepts and their interrelations. Results: We developed the following five main categories: Patient, Teacher, Virtual Patient, Curriculum, and Learner. The concept map includes these categories and highlights aspects such as the under-valued role of patients in shaping their virtual representation and opposing concepts, such as standardization of learner activity versus learner-centeredness. Conclusions: The presented concept map synthesizes VP descriptions and serves as a basis for both, VP use and discussions of research topics related to virtual patients.

KW - Concept mapping

KW - Qualitative content analysis

KW - Virtual patients

KW - Health sciences

KW - Virtual patients

KW - Qualitative content analysis

KW - Concept mapping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971328615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/22e34c7b-9db9-35d0-a637-60a7868d7c79/

U2 - 10.1186/s12909-016-0655-8

DO - 10.1186/s12909-016-0655-8

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 27177766

VL - 16

JO - BMC Medical Education

JF - BMC Medical Education

SN - 1472-6920

IS - 1

M1 - 146

ER -