TY - JOUR

T1 - Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations

T2 - The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement

AU - Forsberg, Ellen-Marie

AU - Anthun, Frank O.

AU - Bailey, Sharon

AU - Birchley, Giles

AU - Bout, Henriette

AU - Casonato, Carlo

AU - Fuster, Gloria Gonzalez

AU - Heinrichs, Bert

AU - Horbach, Serge

AU - Jacobsen, Ingrid Skjaeggestad

AU - Janssen, Jacques

AU - Kaiser, Matthias

AU - Lerouge, Inge

AU - van der Meulen, Barend

AU - de Rijcke, Sarah

AU - Saretzki, Thomas

AU - Sutrop, Margit

AU - Tazewell, Marta

AU - Varantola, Krista

AU - Vie, Knut Jorgen

AU - Zwart, Hub

AU - Zoeller, Mira

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018, The Author(s).

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - This document presents the Bonn PRINTEGER Consensus Statement: Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for research performing organisations. The aim of the statement is to complement existing instruments by focusing specifically on institutional responsibilities for strengthening integrity. It takes into account the daily challenges and organisational contexts of most researchers. The statement intends to make research integrity challenges recognisable from the work-floor perspective, providing concrete advice on organisational measures to strengthen integrity. The statement, which was concluded February 7th 2018, provides guidance on the following key issues:§ 1.Providing information about research integrity§ 2.Providing education, training and mentoring§ 3.Strengthening a research integrity culture§ 4.Facilitating open dialogue§ 5.Wise incentive management§ 6.Implementing quality assurance procedures§ 7.Improving the work environment and work satisfaction§ 8.Increasing transparency of misconduct cases§ 9.Opening up research§ 10.Implementing safe and effective whistle-blowing channels§ 11.Protecting the alleged perpetrators§ 12.Establishing a research integrity committee and appointing an ombudsperson§ 13.Making explicit the applicable standards for research integrity.

AB - This document presents the Bonn PRINTEGER Consensus Statement: Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for research performing organisations. The aim of the statement is to complement existing instruments by focusing specifically on institutional responsibilities for strengthening integrity. It takes into account the daily challenges and organisational contexts of most researchers. The statement intends to make research integrity challenges recognisable from the work-floor perspective, providing concrete advice on organisational measures to strengthen integrity. The statement, which was concluded February 7th 2018, provides guidance on the following key issues:§ 1.Providing information about research integrity§ 2.Providing education, training and mentoring§ 3.Strengthening a research integrity culture§ 4.Facilitating open dialogue§ 5.Wise incentive management§ 6.Implementing quality assurance procedures§ 7.Improving the work environment and work satisfaction§ 8.Increasing transparency of misconduct cases§ 9.Opening up research§ 10.Implementing safe and effective whistle-blowing channels§ 11.Protecting the alleged perpetrators§ 12.Establishing a research integrity committee and appointing an ombudsperson§ 13.Making explicit the applicable standards for research integrity.

KW - Politics

KW - Integrität

KW - Forschung

KW - Organisation

KW - Verantwortung

KW - Research integrity

KW - Research misconduct

KW - Organisational responsibilities

KW - Guidance

KW - Consensus conference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047898680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6ee1e46b-3850-31c8-a883-b15c93c7ee49/

U2 - 10.1007/s11948-018-0034-4

DO - 10.1007/s11948-018-0034-4

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 29855866

VL - 24

SP - 1023

EP - 1034

JO - Science and Engineering Ethics

JF - Science and Engineering Ethics

SN - 1353-3452

IS - 4

ER -