Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Ellen-Marie Forsberg
  • Frank O. Anthun
  • Sharon Bailey
  • Giles Birchley
  • Henriette Bout
  • Carlo Casonato
  • Gloria Gonzalez Fuster
  • Bert Heinrichs
  • Serge Horbach
  • Ingrid Skjaeggestad Jacobsen
  • Jacques Janssen
  • Matthias Kaiser
  • Inge Lerouge
  • Barend van der Meulen
  • Sarah de Rijcke
  • Margit Sutrop
  • Marta Tazewell
  • Krista Varantola
  • Knut Jorgen Vie
  • Hub Zwart
  • Mira Zoeller

This document presents the Bonn PRINTEGER Consensus Statement: Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for research performing organisations. The aim of the statement is to complement existing instruments by focusing specifically on institutional responsibilities for strengthening integrity. It takes into account the daily challenges and organisational contexts of most researchers. The statement intends to make research integrity challenges recognisable from the work-floor perspective, providing concrete advice on organisational measures to strengthen integrity. The statement, which was concluded February 7th 2018, provides guidance on the following key issues:§ 1.Providing information about research integrity§ 2.Providing education, training and mentoring§ 3.Strengthening a research integrity culture§ 4.Facilitating open dialogue§ 5.Wise incentive management§ 6.Implementing quality assurance procedures§ 7.Improving the work environment and work satisfaction§ 8.Increasing transparency of misconduct cases§ 9.Opening up research§ 10.Implementing safe and effective whistle-blowing channels§ 11.Protecting the alleged perpetrators§ 12.Establishing a research integrity committee and appointing an ombudsperson§ 13.Making explicit the applicable standards for research integrity.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScience and Engineering Ethics
Volume24
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)1023-1034
Number of pages12
ISSN1353-3452
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.08.2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, The Author(s).

    Research areas

  • Politics - Research integrity, Research misconduct, Organisational responsibilities, Guidance, Consensus conference

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. unplugged
  2. How real options and ecological resilience thinking can assist in environmental risk management
  3. Cleansing procedures for overlaps and inconsistencies in administrative data. The case of German labour market data
  4. Erbschaft- und Schenkungsteuer
  5. Withholding Performance (Art. 9:201)
  6. Training of student teaching assistants and e-learning via math-bridge-Two projects at the German Centre for Higher Mathematics Education
  7. Tutorenschulung als Teil der Lehrinnovation in der Studieneingangsphase "Mathematik im Lehramtsstudium" (LIMA-Projekt)
  8. Mut zu Visionen
  9. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy (ed. Heidi Maibom), Routledge, 2017
  10. Fairness and the labour market: A theoretical and empirical analysis of layoffs in Germany
  11. Ertragsteuerrecht
  12. Verantwortung kommt mit Nähe
  13. Fantasierealisierung, Theorie
  14. Palaces, Stars and Abeceda. The Body as Indexical Reader in Post-Socialist Art by CORO Collective, Cooltūristės and Paulina Olowska
  15. Messung und Steuerung unternehmerischer Nachhaltigkeit
  16. Sichtweisen zu Lern- und Leistungsschwierigkeiten im Mathematikunterricht der Grundschule
  17. Im Schatten der Regierung?
  18. Die Nihilisierung des Nihilismus - Alfred Seidel (1895-1924)
  19. Security-Management unter HR- und Organisationsaspekten
  20. Global, lokal, digital
  21. Educational Development Processes of Male Adolescents from Immigrant Families
  22. Kollaborationsmöglichkeiten richtig bewerten
  23. El trabajo basado en proyectos en la clase de español con fines profesionales
  24. Charismatische Disposition und Intellektualisierung
  25. Das Wesen der Dinge