Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations : The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement. / Forsberg, Ellen-Marie; Anthun, Frank O.; Bailey, Sharon et al.

in: Science and Engineering Ethics, Jahrgang 24, Nr. 4, 01.08.2018, S. 1023-1034.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Forsberg, E-M, Anthun, FO, Bailey, S, Birchley, G, Bout, H, Casonato, C, Fuster, GG, Heinrichs, B, Horbach, S, Jacobsen, IS, Janssen, J, Kaiser, M, Lerouge, I, van der Meulen, B, de Rijcke, S, Saretzki, T, Sutrop, M, Tazewell, M, Varantola, K, Vie, KJ, Zwart, H & Zoeller, M 2018, 'Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement', Science and Engineering Ethics, Jg. 24, Nr. 4, S. 1023-1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0034-4

APA

Forsberg, E-M., Anthun, F. O., Bailey, S., Birchley, G., Bout, H., Casonato, C., Fuster, G. G., Heinrichs, B., Horbach, S., Jacobsen, I. S., Janssen, J., Kaiser, M., Lerouge, I., van der Meulen, B., de Rijcke, S., Saretzki, T., Sutrop, M., Tazewell, M., Varantola, K., ... Zoeller, M. (2018). Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(4), 1023-1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0034-4

Vancouver

Forsberg E-M, Anthun FO, Bailey S, Birchley G, Bout H, Casonato C et al. Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2018 Aug 1;24(4):1023-1034. Epub 2018 Mai 31. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0034-4

Bibtex

@article{80ff2c892bbf4a8ba8ee34f15446ee97,
title = "Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement",
abstract = "This document presents the Bonn PRINTEGER Consensus Statement: Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for research performing organisations. The aim of the statement is to complement existing instruments by focusing specifically on institutional responsibilities for strengthening integrity. It takes into account the daily challenges and organisational contexts of most researchers. The statement intends to make research integrity challenges recognisable from the work-floor perspective, providing concrete advice on organisational measures to strengthen integrity. The statement, which was concluded February 7th 2018, provides guidance on the following key issues:§ 1.Providing information about research integrity§ 2.Providing education, training and mentoring§ 3.Strengthening a research integrity culture§ 4.Facilitating open dialogue§ 5.Wise incentive management§ 6.Implementing quality assurance procedures§ 7.Improving the work environment and work satisfaction§ 8.Increasing transparency of misconduct cases§ 9.Opening up research§ 10.Implementing safe and effective whistle-blowing channels§ 11.Protecting the alleged perpetrators§ 12.Establishing a research integrity committee and appointing an ombudsperson§ 13.Making explicit the applicable standards for research integrity.",
keywords = "Politics, Integrit{\"a}t, Forschung, Organisation, Verantwortung, Research integrity, Research misconduct, Organisational responsibilities, Guidance, Consensus conference",
author = "Ellen-Marie Forsberg and Anthun, {Frank O.} and Sharon Bailey and Giles Birchley and Henriette Bout and Carlo Casonato and Fuster, {Gloria Gonzalez} and Bert Heinrichs and Serge Horbach and Jacobsen, {Ingrid Skjaeggestad} and Jacques Janssen and Matthias Kaiser and Inge Lerouge and {van der Meulen}, Barend and {de Rijcke}, Sarah and Thomas Saretzki and Margit Sutrop and Marta Tazewell and Krista Varantola and Vie, {Knut Jorgen} and Hub Zwart and Mira Zoeller",
note = "Funding Information: The study was funded by Horizon 2020 with Grant No. 665926. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018, The Author(s).",
year = "2018",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11948-018-0034-4",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1023--1034",
journal = "Science and Engineering Ethics",
issn = "1353-3452",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations

T2 - The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement

AU - Forsberg, Ellen-Marie

AU - Anthun, Frank O.

AU - Bailey, Sharon

AU - Birchley, Giles

AU - Bout, Henriette

AU - Casonato, Carlo

AU - Fuster, Gloria Gonzalez

AU - Heinrichs, Bert

AU - Horbach, Serge

AU - Jacobsen, Ingrid Skjaeggestad

AU - Janssen, Jacques

AU - Kaiser, Matthias

AU - Lerouge, Inge

AU - van der Meulen, Barend

AU - de Rijcke, Sarah

AU - Saretzki, Thomas

AU - Sutrop, Margit

AU - Tazewell, Marta

AU - Varantola, Krista

AU - Vie, Knut Jorgen

AU - Zwart, Hub

AU - Zoeller, Mira

N1 - Funding Information: The study was funded by Horizon 2020 with Grant No. 665926. Publisher Copyright: © 2018, The Author(s).

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - This document presents the Bonn PRINTEGER Consensus Statement: Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for research performing organisations. The aim of the statement is to complement existing instruments by focusing specifically on institutional responsibilities for strengthening integrity. It takes into account the daily challenges and organisational contexts of most researchers. The statement intends to make research integrity challenges recognisable from the work-floor perspective, providing concrete advice on organisational measures to strengthen integrity. The statement, which was concluded February 7th 2018, provides guidance on the following key issues:§ 1.Providing information about research integrity§ 2.Providing education, training and mentoring§ 3.Strengthening a research integrity culture§ 4.Facilitating open dialogue§ 5.Wise incentive management§ 6.Implementing quality assurance procedures§ 7.Improving the work environment and work satisfaction§ 8.Increasing transparency of misconduct cases§ 9.Opening up research§ 10.Implementing safe and effective whistle-blowing channels§ 11.Protecting the alleged perpetrators§ 12.Establishing a research integrity committee and appointing an ombudsperson§ 13.Making explicit the applicable standards for research integrity.

AB - This document presents the Bonn PRINTEGER Consensus Statement: Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for research performing organisations. The aim of the statement is to complement existing instruments by focusing specifically on institutional responsibilities for strengthening integrity. It takes into account the daily challenges and organisational contexts of most researchers. The statement intends to make research integrity challenges recognisable from the work-floor perspective, providing concrete advice on organisational measures to strengthen integrity. The statement, which was concluded February 7th 2018, provides guidance on the following key issues:§ 1.Providing information about research integrity§ 2.Providing education, training and mentoring§ 3.Strengthening a research integrity culture§ 4.Facilitating open dialogue§ 5.Wise incentive management§ 6.Implementing quality assurance procedures§ 7.Improving the work environment and work satisfaction§ 8.Increasing transparency of misconduct cases§ 9.Opening up research§ 10.Implementing safe and effective whistle-blowing channels§ 11.Protecting the alleged perpetrators§ 12.Establishing a research integrity committee and appointing an ombudsperson§ 13.Making explicit the applicable standards for research integrity.

KW - Politics

KW - Integrität

KW - Forschung

KW - Organisation

KW - Verantwortung

KW - Research integrity

KW - Research misconduct

KW - Organisational responsibilities

KW - Guidance

KW - Consensus conference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047898680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11948-018-0034-4

DO - 10.1007/s11948-018-0034-4

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 29855866

VL - 24

SP - 1023

EP - 1034

JO - Science and Engineering Ethics

JF - Science and Engineering Ethics

SN - 1353-3452

IS - 4

ER -

Dokumente

DOI