What makes reading Alexandra Kollontai so intriguing today?
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Feminist Theory, 2025.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - What makes reading Alexandra Kollontai so intriguing today?
AU - Martinez Mateo, Marina
AU - Neuhann, Esther
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The Soviet feminist Alexandra Kollontai has gained renewed attention in contemporary feminist discourse. In particular, family-abolitionist perspectives draw on her critique of the family and bourgeois love, invoking her idea of free (‘red’) love as a form of solidarity. We share this revived enthusiasm, as Kollontai's work continues to offer valuable and inspiring insights today. As we argue in this article, it is especially her dual analysis of gender inequity, including a ‘moral’ or psychic and an economic or material dimension, that proves relevant for current debates. Her work holds the potential for bridging subject-centred and materialist approaches. However, we also recognise pitfalls in Kollontai's conception of the relationship between economic structures and subjectivity which are echoed in contemporary appropriations of her work. We maintain that re-reading Kollontai can raise awareness of the complicated nature of combining a materialist and ‘moral’ perspective on gender. While Kollontai does not fully achieve this mediation, she provides resources for this project that have thus far been overlooked and may still prove useful today.
AB - The Soviet feminist Alexandra Kollontai has gained renewed attention in contemporary feminist discourse. In particular, family-abolitionist perspectives draw on her critique of the family and bourgeois love, invoking her idea of free (‘red’) love as a form of solidarity. We share this revived enthusiasm, as Kollontai's work continues to offer valuable and inspiring insights today. As we argue in this article, it is especially her dual analysis of gender inequity, including a ‘moral’ or psychic and an economic or material dimension, that proves relevant for current debates. Her work holds the potential for bridging subject-centred and materialist approaches. However, we also recognise pitfalls in Kollontai's conception of the relationship between economic structures and subjectivity which are echoed in contemporary appropriations of her work. We maintain that re-reading Kollontai can raise awareness of the complicated nature of combining a materialist and ‘moral’ perspective on gender. While Kollontai does not fully achieve this mediation, she provides resources for this project that have thus far been overlooked and may still prove useful today.
KW - Alexandra Kollontai
KW - capitalism and care
KW - family abolition
KW - love
KW - materialist feminism
KW - property
KW - Philosophy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105004462957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/14647001251336165
DO - 10.1177/14647001251336165
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:105004462957
JO - Feminist Theory
JF - Feminist Theory
SN - 1464-7001
ER -