Using EEG movement tagging to isolate brain responses coupled to biological movements

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Using EEG movement tagging to isolate brain responses coupled to biological movements. / Cracco, Emiel; Oomen, Danna; Papeo, Liuba et al.
In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 177, 108395, 15.12.2022.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Cracco E, Oomen D, Papeo L, Wiersema JR. Using EEG movement tagging to isolate brain responses coupled to biological movements. Neuropsychologia. 2022 Dec 15;177:108395. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108395

Bibtex

@article{d898d9a75e16483f85ff6cbf3823da6e,
title = "Using EEG movement tagging to isolate brain responses coupled to biological movements",
abstract = "Detecting biological motion is essential for adaptive social behavior. Previous research has revealed the brain processes underlying this ability. However, brain activity during biological motion perception captures a multitude of processes. As a result, it is often unclear which processes reflect movement processing and which processes reflect secondary processes that build on movement processing. To address this issue, we developed a new approach to measure brain responses directly coupled to observed movements. Specifically, we showed 30 male and female adults a point-light walker moving at a pace of 2.4 Hz and used EEG frequency tagging to measure the brain response coupled to that pace ({\textquoteleft}movement tagging{\textquoteright}). The results revealed a reliable response at the walking frequency that was reduced by two manipulations known to disrupt biological motion perception: phase scrambling and inversion. Interestingly, we also identified a brain response at half the walking frequency (i.e., 1.2 Hz), corresponding to the rate at which the individual dots completed a cycle. In contrast to the 2.4 Hz response, the response at 1.2 Hz was increased for scrambled (vs. unscrambled) walkers. These results show that frequency tagging can be used to capture the visual processing of biological movements and can dissociate between global (2.4 Hz) and local (1.2 Hz) processes involved in biological motion perception, at different frequencies of the brain signal.",
keywords = "Biological motion perception, EEG, Frequency tagging, Global processing, Local processing, Sustainability Governance, Biology",
author = "Emiel Cracco and Danna Oomen and Liuba Papeo and Wiersema, {Jan R.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108395",
language = "English",
volume = "177",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using EEG movement tagging to isolate brain responses coupled to biological movements

AU - Cracco, Emiel

AU - Oomen, Danna

AU - Papeo, Liuba

AU - Wiersema, Jan R.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022/12/15

Y1 - 2022/12/15

N2 - Detecting biological motion is essential for adaptive social behavior. Previous research has revealed the brain processes underlying this ability. However, brain activity during biological motion perception captures a multitude of processes. As a result, it is often unclear which processes reflect movement processing and which processes reflect secondary processes that build on movement processing. To address this issue, we developed a new approach to measure brain responses directly coupled to observed movements. Specifically, we showed 30 male and female adults a point-light walker moving at a pace of 2.4 Hz and used EEG frequency tagging to measure the brain response coupled to that pace (‘movement tagging’). The results revealed a reliable response at the walking frequency that was reduced by two manipulations known to disrupt biological motion perception: phase scrambling and inversion. Interestingly, we also identified a brain response at half the walking frequency (i.e., 1.2 Hz), corresponding to the rate at which the individual dots completed a cycle. In contrast to the 2.4 Hz response, the response at 1.2 Hz was increased for scrambled (vs. unscrambled) walkers. These results show that frequency tagging can be used to capture the visual processing of biological movements and can dissociate between global (2.4 Hz) and local (1.2 Hz) processes involved in biological motion perception, at different frequencies of the brain signal.

AB - Detecting biological motion is essential for adaptive social behavior. Previous research has revealed the brain processes underlying this ability. However, brain activity during biological motion perception captures a multitude of processes. As a result, it is often unclear which processes reflect movement processing and which processes reflect secondary processes that build on movement processing. To address this issue, we developed a new approach to measure brain responses directly coupled to observed movements. Specifically, we showed 30 male and female adults a point-light walker moving at a pace of 2.4 Hz and used EEG frequency tagging to measure the brain response coupled to that pace (‘movement tagging’). The results revealed a reliable response at the walking frequency that was reduced by two manipulations known to disrupt biological motion perception: phase scrambling and inversion. Interestingly, we also identified a brain response at half the walking frequency (i.e., 1.2 Hz), corresponding to the rate at which the individual dots completed a cycle. In contrast to the 2.4 Hz response, the response at 1.2 Hz was increased for scrambled (vs. unscrambled) walkers. These results show that frequency tagging can be used to capture the visual processing of biological movements and can dissociate between global (2.4 Hz) and local (1.2 Hz) processes involved in biological motion perception, at different frequencies of the brain signal.

KW - Biological motion perception

KW - EEG

KW - Frequency tagging

KW - Global processing

KW - Local processing

KW - Sustainability Governance

KW - Biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140930841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/72c9f994-d37e-30e1-90c9-7686b4284ff0/

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108395

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108395

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 36272677

AN - SCOPUS:85140930841

VL - 177

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

M1 - 108395

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. DigiSchreib
  2. Functions of Constitutions
  3. Choice and quantity demand for improved and unimproved public water sources in rural areas
  4. Understanding Records. A Field Guide to Recording Practice
  5. Using authentic representations of practice in teacher education
  6. Rate constants for the gas-phase reaction of OH with amines
  7. Dispute and morality in the perception of societal risks: extending the psychometric model
  8. Analytical and Experimental Performance Analysis of Enhanced Wake-Up Receivers Based on Low-Power Base-Band Amplifiers
  9. Open Innovation in Schools
  10. Towards a ‘Sustainable University’
  11. Empathy as a motivator of dyadic helping across group boundaries
  12. A Robust Decoupling Estimator to Indentify Electrical Parameters for Three-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors
  13. Missiology: An Introduction to the Foundations, History, and Strategies of World Missions
  14. Wie partizipativ sind Bottom-up-Transformationen?
  15. Neuro-Symbolic Relation Extraction
  16. More than the sum of its parts? Synergy and picturebook translation
  17. Learning Soccer in Elementary School: Using Teaching Games for Understanding and Digital Media
  18. What if this was a piece of art
  19. Managerial Eco-Control in Manufacturing and Process Industries
  20. The most frequent phrasal verbs in English language EU documents - A corpus-based analysis and its implications
  21. Old Wine in New Bottles? The Case of Self-compassion and Neuroticism
  22. Measuring Method Effects
  23. Trust-Based Cooperation Relationships between SMEs
  24. Exploring the “works with nature” pillar of food sovereignty
  25. Less is sometimes more