Using corpus-linguistic methods to track longitudinal development: Routine apologies in the study abroad context

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Using corpus-linguistic methods to track longitudinal development: Routine apologies in the study abroad context . / Barron, Anne.
In: Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 146, 01.06.2019, p. 87-105.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{32548494aee84b3e88fdac74e7f96bcb,
title = "Using corpus-linguistic methods to track longitudinal development: Routine apologies in the study abroad context ",
abstract = "Despite the recent emergence of corpus pragmatics, the use of corpus linguistic methods in interlanguage pragmatics remains limited. This study employs corpus linguistic methods to shed light on recurring patterns of use within a speaker group over time and also between speaker groups. We examine the extent to which a group of 33 Anglophone learners of German develop their knowledge of pragmatic routines in realising apologies in study abroad. Data was elicited via a production questionnaire and baseline data was also gathered. Corpus-driven methods reveal the primacy of explicit apologies in the data and facilitate an in-depth, fine-grained quantitative and qualitative analysis of these pragmatic routines by learners and native speakers alike. As such, the analysis incorporates the traditional level of the strategy, but also goes beyond it to focus on the formal level and investigate routine variants, routine modifications and learner-specific realisations. Findings reveal several unchanging features of learner apology behaviour over time, including a stable and heightened learner preference for explicit apologies relative to an L2 norm and an unchanging dependency on the realisation of these explicit apologies via a single routine expression. Developments towards an L2 norm are also recorded, as are non-linear developments frequently involving increases in learner-specific realisations. The path followed by a routine is shown to be dependent on an array of factors, including whether another form fulfils the same function, how complex a particular routine is and whether an equivalent routine exists in the L1. The article closes with a discussion of the potential for using corpus linguistic methods as a means of investigating routine development.",
keywords = "Language Studies, Corpus analysis, Pragmatic development, Study abroad, Pragmatic routine, Apology, Longitudinal",
author = "Anne Barron",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.015",
language = "English",
volume = "146",
pages = "87--105",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using corpus-linguistic methods to track longitudinal development

T2 - Routine apologies in the study abroad context

AU - Barron, Anne

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Despite the recent emergence of corpus pragmatics, the use of corpus linguistic methods in interlanguage pragmatics remains limited. This study employs corpus linguistic methods to shed light on recurring patterns of use within a speaker group over time and also between speaker groups. We examine the extent to which a group of 33 Anglophone learners of German develop their knowledge of pragmatic routines in realising apologies in study abroad. Data was elicited via a production questionnaire and baseline data was also gathered. Corpus-driven methods reveal the primacy of explicit apologies in the data and facilitate an in-depth, fine-grained quantitative and qualitative analysis of these pragmatic routines by learners and native speakers alike. As such, the analysis incorporates the traditional level of the strategy, but also goes beyond it to focus on the formal level and investigate routine variants, routine modifications and learner-specific realisations. Findings reveal several unchanging features of learner apology behaviour over time, including a stable and heightened learner preference for explicit apologies relative to an L2 norm and an unchanging dependency on the realisation of these explicit apologies via a single routine expression. Developments towards an L2 norm are also recorded, as are non-linear developments frequently involving increases in learner-specific realisations. The path followed by a routine is shown to be dependent on an array of factors, including whether another form fulfils the same function, how complex a particular routine is and whether an equivalent routine exists in the L1. The article closes with a discussion of the potential for using corpus linguistic methods as a means of investigating routine development.

AB - Despite the recent emergence of corpus pragmatics, the use of corpus linguistic methods in interlanguage pragmatics remains limited. This study employs corpus linguistic methods to shed light on recurring patterns of use within a speaker group over time and also between speaker groups. We examine the extent to which a group of 33 Anglophone learners of German develop their knowledge of pragmatic routines in realising apologies in study abroad. Data was elicited via a production questionnaire and baseline data was also gathered. Corpus-driven methods reveal the primacy of explicit apologies in the data and facilitate an in-depth, fine-grained quantitative and qualitative analysis of these pragmatic routines by learners and native speakers alike. As such, the analysis incorporates the traditional level of the strategy, but also goes beyond it to focus on the formal level and investigate routine variants, routine modifications and learner-specific realisations. Findings reveal several unchanging features of learner apology behaviour over time, including a stable and heightened learner preference for explicit apologies relative to an L2 norm and an unchanging dependency on the realisation of these explicit apologies via a single routine expression. Developments towards an L2 norm are also recorded, as are non-linear developments frequently involving increases in learner-specific realisations. The path followed by a routine is shown to be dependent on an array of factors, including whether another form fulfils the same function, how complex a particular routine is and whether an equivalent routine exists in the L1. The article closes with a discussion of the potential for using corpus linguistic methods as a means of investigating routine development.

KW - Language Studies

KW - Corpus analysis

KW - Pragmatic development

KW - Study abroad

KW - Pragmatic routine

KW - Apology

KW - Longitudinal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053300975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.015

DO - 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.015

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 146

SP - 87

EP - 105

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

ER -

Documents

DOI