Unpacking the Personal Initiative-Performance Relationship: A Multi-Group Analysis of Innovation by Ugandan Rural and Urban Entrepreneurs

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Unpacking the Personal Initiative-Performance Relationship : A Multi-Group Analysis of Innovation by Ugandan Rural and Urban Entrepreneurs. / Rooks, Gerrit; Sserwanga, Arthur; Frese, Michael.

In: Applied Psychology, Vol. 65, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 99-131.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{168d76efeef046369b5153198cf634da,
title = "Unpacking the Personal Initiative-Performance Relationship: A Multi-Group Analysis of Innovation by Ugandan Rural and Urban Entrepreneurs",
abstract = "This article considers determinants of innovative performance of entrepreneurs in developing countries. Innovation is viewed from a personal initiative perspective. We distinguish two mechanisms through which entrepreneurs who show personal initiative are innovative. The first mechanism is business planning. The second mechanism is the acquisition of resources that can be accessed through a social network of relations. We argue that the two mechanisms depend on the context of innovation. Planning will be more beneficial in more dynamic environments. In dynamic and individualistic-oriented environments it will be more beneficial to actively develop networks. In more static, collectivistic-oriented environments personal initiative will be less beneficial. The model was tested using a sizable survey of 283 rural and 290 urban entrepreneurs in Uganda, a country located in East Africa.",
keywords = "Entrepreneurship, Business psychology",
author = "Gerrit Rooks and Arthur Sserwanga and Michael Frese",
note = "We are grateful to all our colleagues and assistants who helped us with the data collection.Michael Frese is grateful for a travel grant from the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst(DAAD; A/07/26080), and a grant from the MOE-National University of Singapore (R-317-000-084-133)",
year = "2016",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/apps.12033",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "99--131",
journal = "Applied Psychology",
issn = "0269-994X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking the Personal Initiative-Performance Relationship

T2 - A Multi-Group Analysis of Innovation by Ugandan Rural and Urban Entrepreneurs

AU - Rooks, Gerrit

AU - Sserwanga, Arthur

AU - Frese, Michael

N1 - We are grateful to all our colleagues and assistants who helped us with the data collection.Michael Frese is grateful for a travel grant from the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst(DAAD; A/07/26080), and a grant from the MOE-National University of Singapore (R-317-000-084-133)

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This article considers determinants of innovative performance of entrepreneurs in developing countries. Innovation is viewed from a personal initiative perspective. We distinguish two mechanisms through which entrepreneurs who show personal initiative are innovative. The first mechanism is business planning. The second mechanism is the acquisition of resources that can be accessed through a social network of relations. We argue that the two mechanisms depend on the context of innovation. Planning will be more beneficial in more dynamic environments. In dynamic and individualistic-oriented environments it will be more beneficial to actively develop networks. In more static, collectivistic-oriented environments personal initiative will be less beneficial. The model was tested using a sizable survey of 283 rural and 290 urban entrepreneurs in Uganda, a country located in East Africa.

AB - This article considers determinants of innovative performance of entrepreneurs in developing countries. Innovation is viewed from a personal initiative perspective. We distinguish two mechanisms through which entrepreneurs who show personal initiative are innovative. The first mechanism is business planning. The second mechanism is the acquisition of resources that can be accessed through a social network of relations. We argue that the two mechanisms depend on the context of innovation. Planning will be more beneficial in more dynamic environments. In dynamic and individualistic-oriented environments it will be more beneficial to actively develop networks. In more static, collectivistic-oriented environments personal initiative will be less beneficial. The model was tested using a sizable survey of 283 rural and 290 urban entrepreneurs in Uganda, a country located in East Africa.

KW - Entrepreneurship

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955208309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/apps.12033

DO - 10.1111/apps.12033

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 65

SP - 99

EP - 131

JO - Applied Psychology

JF - Applied Psychology

SN - 0269-994X

IS - 1

ER -

DOI