Towards Ecosystems for Responsible AI: Expectations on Sociotechnical Systems, Agendas, and Networks in EU Documents
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Article in conference proceedings › Research › peer-review
Standard
Responsible AI and Analytics for an Ethical and Inclusive Digitized Society: 20th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, I3E 2021, Galway, Ireland, September 1–3, 2021, Proceedings. ed. / Denis Dennehy; Anastasia Griva; Nancy Pouloudi; Yogesh K. Dwivedi; Ilias Pappas; Matti Mäntymäki. Cham: Springer Schweiz, 2021. p. 220-232 20 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 12896).
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Article in conference proceedings › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Towards Ecosystems for Responsible AI
T2 - Expectations on Sociotechnical Systems, Agendas, and Networks in EU Documents
AU - Minkkinen, Matti
AU - Zimmer, Markus Philipp
AU - Mäntymäki, Matti
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.
PY - 2021/8/25
Y1 - 2021/8/25
N2 - Governing artificial intelligence (AI) requires multi-actor cooperation, but what form could this cooperation take? In recent years, the European Union (EU) has made significant efforts to become a key player in establishing responsible AI. In its strategy documents on AI, the EU has formulated expectations and visions concerning ecosystems for responsible AI. This paper analyzes expectations on potential responsible AI ecosystems in five key EU documents on AI. To analyze these documents, we draw on the sociology of expectations and synthesize a framework comprising cognitive and normative expectations on sociotechnical systems, agendas and networks. We found that the EU documents on responsible AI feature four interconnected themes, which occupy different positions in our framework: 1) trust as the foundation of responsible AI (cognitive–sociotechnical systems), 2) ethics and competitiveness as complementary (normative–sociotechnical systems), 3) European value-based approach (normative–agendas), and 4) Europe as global leader in responsible AI (normative–networks). Our framework thus provides a mapping tool for researchers and practitioners to navigate expectations in early ecosystem development and help decide what to do in response to articulated expectations. The analysis also suggests that expectations on emerging responsible AI ecosystems have a layered structure, where network building relies on expectations about sociotechnical systems and agendas.
AB - Governing artificial intelligence (AI) requires multi-actor cooperation, but what form could this cooperation take? In recent years, the European Union (EU) has made significant efforts to become a key player in establishing responsible AI. In its strategy documents on AI, the EU has formulated expectations and visions concerning ecosystems for responsible AI. This paper analyzes expectations on potential responsible AI ecosystems in five key EU documents on AI. To analyze these documents, we draw on the sociology of expectations and synthesize a framework comprising cognitive and normative expectations on sociotechnical systems, agendas and networks. We found that the EU documents on responsible AI feature four interconnected themes, which occupy different positions in our framework: 1) trust as the foundation of responsible AI (cognitive–sociotechnical systems), 2) ethics and competitiveness as complementary (normative–sociotechnical systems), 3) European value-based approach (normative–agendas), and 4) Europe as global leader in responsible AI (normative–networks). Our framework thus provides a mapping tool for researchers and practitioners to navigate expectations in early ecosystem development and help decide what to do in response to articulated expectations. The analysis also suggests that expectations on emerging responsible AI ecosystems have a layered structure, where network building relies on expectations about sociotechnical systems and agendas.
KW - Informatics
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Artificial intelligence governance
KW - Ecosystems
KW - Business informatics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115124736&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5b84f59e-a282-3357-8711-22d9ed883ae5/
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_20
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_20
M3 - Article in conference proceedings
SN - 978-3-030-85446-1
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science
SP - 220
EP - 232
BT - Responsible AI and Analytics for an Ethical and Inclusive Digitized Society
A2 - Dennehy, Denis
A2 - Griva, Anastasia
A2 - Pouloudi, Nancy
A2 - Dwivedi, Yogesh K.
A2 - Pappas, Ilias
A2 - Mäntymäki, Matti
PB - Springer Schweiz
CY - Cham
ER -