Towards Ecosystems for Responsible AI: Expectations on Sociotechnical Systems, Agendas, and Networks in EU Documents

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in KonferenzbändenForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Towards Ecosystems for Responsible AI: Expectations on Sociotechnical Systems, Agendas, and Networks in EU Documents. / Minkkinen, Matti; Zimmer, Markus Philipp; Mäntymäki, Matti.
Responsible AI and Analytics for an Ethical and Inclusive Digitized Society: 20th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, I3E 2021, Galway, Ireland, September 1–3, 2021, Proceedings. Hrsg. / Denis Dennehy; Anastasia Griva; Nancy Pouloudi; Yogesh K. Dwivedi; Ilias Pappas; Matti Mäntymäki. Cham: Springer Schweiz, 2021. S. 220-232 20 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Band 12896).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in KonferenzbändenForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Minkkinen, M, Zimmer, MP & Mäntymäki, M 2021, Towards Ecosystems for Responsible AI: Expectations on Sociotechnical Systems, Agendas, and Networks in EU Documents. in D Dennehy, A Griva, N Pouloudi, YK Dwivedi, I Pappas & M Mäntymäki (Hrsg.), Responsible AI and Analytics for an Ethical and Inclusive Digitized Society: 20th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, I3E 2021, Galway, Ireland, September 1–3, 2021, Proceedings., 20, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Bd. 12896, Springer Schweiz, Cham, S. 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_20

APA

Minkkinen, M., Zimmer, M. P., & Mäntymäki, M. (2021). Towards Ecosystems for Responsible AI: Expectations on Sociotechnical Systems, Agendas, and Networks in EU Documents. In D. Dennehy, A. Griva, N. Pouloudi, Y. K. Dwivedi, I. Pappas, & M. Mäntymäki (Hrsg.), Responsible AI and Analytics for an Ethical and Inclusive Digitized Society: 20th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, I3E 2021, Galway, Ireland, September 1–3, 2021, Proceedings (S. 220-232). Artikel 20 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Band 12896). Springer Schweiz. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_20

Vancouver

Minkkinen M, Zimmer MP, Mäntymäki M. Towards Ecosystems for Responsible AI: Expectations on Sociotechnical Systems, Agendas, and Networks in EU Documents. in Dennehy D, Griva A, Pouloudi N, Dwivedi YK, Pappas I, Mäntymäki M, Hrsg., Responsible AI and Analytics for an Ethical and Inclusive Digitized Society: 20th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, I3E 2021, Galway, Ireland, September 1–3, 2021, Proceedings. Cham: Springer Schweiz. 2021. S. 220-232. 20. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_20

Bibtex

@inbook{66dfd6881ba2498e9aeb0c6a34f33fac,
title = "Towards Ecosystems for Responsible AI: Expectations on Sociotechnical Systems, Agendas, and Networks in EU Documents",
abstract = "Governing artificial intelligence (AI) requires multi-actor cooperation, but what form could this cooperation take? In recent years, the European Union (EU) has made significant efforts to become a key player in establishing responsible AI. In its strategy documents on AI, the EU has formulated expectations and visions concerning ecosystems for responsible AI. This paper analyzes expectations on potential responsible AI ecosystems in five key EU documents on AI. To analyze these documents, we draw on the sociology of expectations and synthesize a framework comprising cognitive and normative expectations on sociotechnical systems, agendas and networks. We found that the EU documents on responsible AI feature four interconnected themes, which occupy different positions in our framework: 1) trust as the foundation of responsible AI (cognitive–sociotechnical systems), 2) ethics and competitiveness as complementary (normative–sociotechnical systems), 3) European value-based approach (normative–agendas), and 4) Europe as global leader in responsible AI (normative–networks). Our framework thus provides a mapping tool for researchers and practitioners to navigate expectations in early ecosystem development and help decide what to do in response to articulated expectations. The analysis also suggests that expectations on emerging responsible AI ecosystems have a layered structure, where network building relies on expectations about sociotechnical systems and agendas.",
keywords = "Informatics, Artificial intelligence, Artificial intelligence governance, Ecosystems, Business informatics",
author = "Matti Minkkinen and Zimmer, {Markus Philipp} and Matti M{\"a}ntym{\"a}ki",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
day = "25",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_20",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-030-85446-1",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science",
publisher = "Springer Schweiz",
pages = "220--232",
editor = "Denis Dennehy and Anastasia Griva and Nancy Pouloudi and Dwivedi, {Yogesh K.} and Ilias Pappas and Matti M{\"a}ntym{\"a}ki",
booktitle = "Responsible AI and Analytics for an Ethical and Inclusive Digitized Society",
address = "Switzerland",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Towards Ecosystems for Responsible AI

T2 - Expectations on Sociotechnical Systems, Agendas, and Networks in EU Documents

AU - Minkkinen, Matti

AU - Zimmer, Markus Philipp

AU - Mäntymäki, Matti

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

PY - 2021/8/25

Y1 - 2021/8/25

N2 - Governing artificial intelligence (AI) requires multi-actor cooperation, but what form could this cooperation take? In recent years, the European Union (EU) has made significant efforts to become a key player in establishing responsible AI. In its strategy documents on AI, the EU has formulated expectations and visions concerning ecosystems for responsible AI. This paper analyzes expectations on potential responsible AI ecosystems in five key EU documents on AI. To analyze these documents, we draw on the sociology of expectations and synthesize a framework comprising cognitive and normative expectations on sociotechnical systems, agendas and networks. We found that the EU documents on responsible AI feature four interconnected themes, which occupy different positions in our framework: 1) trust as the foundation of responsible AI (cognitive–sociotechnical systems), 2) ethics and competitiveness as complementary (normative–sociotechnical systems), 3) European value-based approach (normative–agendas), and 4) Europe as global leader in responsible AI (normative–networks). Our framework thus provides a mapping tool for researchers and practitioners to navigate expectations in early ecosystem development and help decide what to do in response to articulated expectations. The analysis also suggests that expectations on emerging responsible AI ecosystems have a layered structure, where network building relies on expectations about sociotechnical systems and agendas.

AB - Governing artificial intelligence (AI) requires multi-actor cooperation, but what form could this cooperation take? In recent years, the European Union (EU) has made significant efforts to become a key player in establishing responsible AI. In its strategy documents on AI, the EU has formulated expectations and visions concerning ecosystems for responsible AI. This paper analyzes expectations on potential responsible AI ecosystems in five key EU documents on AI. To analyze these documents, we draw on the sociology of expectations and synthesize a framework comprising cognitive and normative expectations on sociotechnical systems, agendas and networks. We found that the EU documents on responsible AI feature four interconnected themes, which occupy different positions in our framework: 1) trust as the foundation of responsible AI (cognitive–sociotechnical systems), 2) ethics and competitiveness as complementary (normative–sociotechnical systems), 3) European value-based approach (normative–agendas), and 4) Europe as global leader in responsible AI (normative–networks). Our framework thus provides a mapping tool for researchers and practitioners to navigate expectations in early ecosystem development and help decide what to do in response to articulated expectations. The analysis also suggests that expectations on emerging responsible AI ecosystems have a layered structure, where network building relies on expectations about sociotechnical systems and agendas.

KW - Informatics

KW - Artificial intelligence

KW - Artificial intelligence governance

KW - Ecosystems

KW - Business informatics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115124736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5b84f59e-a282-3357-8711-22d9ed883ae5/

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_20

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_20

M3 - Article in conference proceedings

SN - 978-3-030-85446-1

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science

SP - 220

EP - 232

BT - Responsible AI and Analytics for an Ethical and Inclusive Digitized Society

A2 - Dennehy, Denis

A2 - Griva, Anastasia

A2 - Pouloudi, Nancy

A2 - Dwivedi, Yogesh K.

A2 - Pappas, Ilias

A2 - Mäntymäki, Matti

PB - Springer Schweiz

CY - Cham

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Gerhard Schäffner

Publikationen

  1. Einleitung
  2. Introduction: Perspectives on Democracy
  3. Sex differences in stretch-induced hypertrophy, maximal strength and flexibility gains
  4. In the Eye of the Beholder
  5. Transdisziplinäre Forschung mit transformativem Anspruch Zehn Jahre NaWis
  6. Dynamische Losgrößenoptimierung mit bestärkendem Lernen
  7. Characteristics, emerging needs, and challenges of transdisciplinary sustainability science
  8. Settingbasierte Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention
  9. Rainfall and temperature variation does not explain arid species diversity in outback Australia
  10. Investigation of the photochemistry and quantum yields of triazines using polychromatic irradiation and UV-spectroscopy as analytical tool
  11. Adaptive Speed Tests
  12. Aquatic Exposure Predictions of Insecticide Field Concentrations Using a Multimedia Mass-Balance Model
  13. Oxidation Kinetics of Neat Methyl Oleate and as a Blend with Solketal
  14. US English and Pragmatic Norms
  15. ‚Das könnte Sie auch interessieren‘
  16. Crisis Management by Subjectivation
  17. Bei sich sein
  18. Paleoenvironment and possibilities of plant exploitation in the Middle Pleistocene of Schöningen (Germany). Insights from botanical macro-remains and pollen
  19. Europe and the Media
  20. Undoing Networks
  21. Competitive interactions shape plant responses to nitrogen fertilization and drought
  22. Yuval Shany, Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts
  23. The Formation Mechanisms and Improvement Measures for Penetrating Cracks in QAl9-4/Q345B Welded Joint
  24. When do customers engage with a company?
  25. Albert, Alice, Alfred
  26. Evaluating ecosystem services in transhumance cultural landscapes. An interdisciplinary and participatory framework