The role of spatial ability when fostering mental animation in multimedia learning: An ATI-study

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The role of spatial ability when fostering mental animation in multimedia learning: An ATI-study. / Park, Babette; Münzer, Stefan; Seufert, Tina et al.
In: Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 64, 01.11.2016, p. 497-506.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Park B, Münzer S, Seufert T, Brünken R. The role of spatial ability when fostering mental animation in multimedia learning: An ATI-study. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016 Nov 1;64:497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.022

Bibtex

@article{8e462d27aeee4a8da78f7794e9934044,
title = "The role of spatial ability when fostering mental animation in multimedia learning: An ATI-study",
abstract = "The present Aptitude-Treatment-Interaction (ATI) study investigates the learner characteristic spatial ability (aptitude) and the variation of mental-animation prompts (treatment: no vs. mental-animation prompts). A group of high-school students (N = 94) learned about a biology topic through learner-paced multimedia instruction. Some of the learners received mental-animation prompts and others learned without prompts. A fine-grained analysis with spatial ability as continuous aptitude variable and mental animation as treatment showed a positive learning effect of animation prompts in learning outcomes of processes, but not in knowledge about structures. In addition, spatial ability only modified the relationship between animation prompts and learning when analyzing knowledge about processes. Specifically, only learners of low to medium spatial ability profited from the prompts while learners with very low or high spatial ability had comparable results when learning with or without prompts. In addition, only learners with high spatial ability rated their cognitive load to be significantly higher when learning with prompts. Results align with the assumptions of the production deficiency of learners with low to medium spatial ability, mediation deficiency of learners with very low spatial ability and stable learning performance of learners with high spatial ability whatever the learning situation offers.",
keywords = "Aptitude-treatment interaction, Cognitive load, Johnson-Neyman significance region, Mental animation, Multimedia learning, Spatial ability, Educational science",
author = "Babette Park and Stefan M{\"u}nzer and Tina Seufert and Roland Br{\"u}nken",
year = "2016",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.022",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "497--506",
journal = "Computers in Human Behavior",
issn = "0747-5632",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of spatial ability when fostering mental animation in multimedia learning

T2 - An ATI-study

AU - Park, Babette

AU - Münzer, Stefan

AU - Seufert, Tina

AU - Brünken, Roland

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - The present Aptitude-Treatment-Interaction (ATI) study investigates the learner characteristic spatial ability (aptitude) and the variation of mental-animation prompts (treatment: no vs. mental-animation prompts). A group of high-school students (N = 94) learned about a biology topic through learner-paced multimedia instruction. Some of the learners received mental-animation prompts and others learned without prompts. A fine-grained analysis with spatial ability as continuous aptitude variable and mental animation as treatment showed a positive learning effect of animation prompts in learning outcomes of processes, but not in knowledge about structures. In addition, spatial ability only modified the relationship between animation prompts and learning when analyzing knowledge about processes. Specifically, only learners of low to medium spatial ability profited from the prompts while learners with very low or high spatial ability had comparable results when learning with or without prompts. In addition, only learners with high spatial ability rated their cognitive load to be significantly higher when learning with prompts. Results align with the assumptions of the production deficiency of learners with low to medium spatial ability, mediation deficiency of learners with very low spatial ability and stable learning performance of learners with high spatial ability whatever the learning situation offers.

AB - The present Aptitude-Treatment-Interaction (ATI) study investigates the learner characteristic spatial ability (aptitude) and the variation of mental-animation prompts (treatment: no vs. mental-animation prompts). A group of high-school students (N = 94) learned about a biology topic through learner-paced multimedia instruction. Some of the learners received mental-animation prompts and others learned without prompts. A fine-grained analysis with spatial ability as continuous aptitude variable and mental animation as treatment showed a positive learning effect of animation prompts in learning outcomes of processes, but not in knowledge about structures. In addition, spatial ability only modified the relationship between animation prompts and learning when analyzing knowledge about processes. Specifically, only learners of low to medium spatial ability profited from the prompts while learners with very low or high spatial ability had comparable results when learning with or without prompts. In addition, only learners with high spatial ability rated their cognitive load to be significantly higher when learning with prompts. Results align with the assumptions of the production deficiency of learners with low to medium spatial ability, mediation deficiency of learners with very low spatial ability and stable learning performance of learners with high spatial ability whatever the learning situation offers.

KW - Aptitude-treatment interaction

KW - Cognitive load

KW - Johnson-Neyman significance region

KW - Mental animation

KW - Multimedia learning

KW - Spatial ability

KW - Educational science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989951989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.022

DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.022

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84989951989

VL - 64

SP - 497

EP - 506

JO - Computers in Human Behavior

JF - Computers in Human Behavior

SN - 0747-5632

ER -