The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach. / García-Llorente, Marina; Martín-López, Berta; Iniesta-Arandia, Irene et al.
In: Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 19-20, 05.2012, p. 136-146.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

García-Llorente M, Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, López-Santiago CA, Aguilera PA, Montes C. The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach. Environmental Science & Policy. 2012 May;19-20:136-146. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.006

Bibtex

@article{c2eae86b9c9f4d7ea350ce04b8b2f0ae,
title = "The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach",
abstract = "The present study analyzes the relationship between landscape multi-functionality and social preferences toward Mediterranean landscapes in terms of monetary and non-monetary techniques. Twenty landscape views were selected as representative of the landscape units characterizing Nacimiento and Adra semi-arid watersheds (southeastern Spain). Face-to-face questionnaires were used to assess social factors that influence willingness to pay for aesthetic landscape enjoyment (use value) and landscape conservation (non-use value). Meanwhile, an expert focus group analyzed the capacity of the selected semi-arid ecosystems for supplying services to society. The favorite landscape views mainly contained steeper reliefs, water flows, and traditional human activities. Our results suggest a strong positive effect between respondents' place attachment and the level of support for landscape conservation. Respondents were more willing to pay for the conservation of semi-arid rural landscapes when their sense of belonging was greater. We also found that multi-functional landscapes, which provide higher numbers of regulating and cultural services, were also preferred in terms of their visual quality (use value). Additionally, they had more social support for their conservation (non-use value). The conversion of multi-functional landscapes to mono-functional ones disturbs the stability of rural areas, their capacity to provide other ecosystem services, and the social support toward their preservation. To reverse this tendency, two major ideas should be emphasized. The first is the necessity of considering the ecological components and processes behind landscapes, and the second is the role of the local population on rural landscape conservation.",
keywords = "Contingent valuation, Expert focus group, Landscape aesthetic, Mediterranean, Social-ecological system, Value, Sustainability Science, contingent valuation, Expert focus group, Landscape aesthetic, Mediterranean, Social–ecological system",
author = "Marina Garc{\'i}a-Llorente and Berta Mart{\'i}n-L{\'o}pez and Irene Iniesta-Arandia and L{\'o}pez-Santiago, {C{\'e}sar A.} and Aguilera, {Pedro A.} and Carlos Montes",
year = "2012",
month = may,
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.006",
language = "English",
volume = "19-20",
pages = "136--146",
journal = "Environmental Science & Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes

T2 - An ecosystem service approach

AU - García-Llorente, Marina

AU - Martín-López, Berta

AU - Iniesta-Arandia, Irene

AU - López-Santiago, César A.

AU - Aguilera, Pedro A.

AU - Montes, Carlos

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - The present study analyzes the relationship between landscape multi-functionality and social preferences toward Mediterranean landscapes in terms of monetary and non-monetary techniques. Twenty landscape views were selected as representative of the landscape units characterizing Nacimiento and Adra semi-arid watersheds (southeastern Spain). Face-to-face questionnaires were used to assess social factors that influence willingness to pay for aesthetic landscape enjoyment (use value) and landscape conservation (non-use value). Meanwhile, an expert focus group analyzed the capacity of the selected semi-arid ecosystems for supplying services to society. The favorite landscape views mainly contained steeper reliefs, water flows, and traditional human activities. Our results suggest a strong positive effect between respondents' place attachment and the level of support for landscape conservation. Respondents were more willing to pay for the conservation of semi-arid rural landscapes when their sense of belonging was greater. We also found that multi-functional landscapes, which provide higher numbers of regulating and cultural services, were also preferred in terms of their visual quality (use value). Additionally, they had more social support for their conservation (non-use value). The conversion of multi-functional landscapes to mono-functional ones disturbs the stability of rural areas, their capacity to provide other ecosystem services, and the social support toward their preservation. To reverse this tendency, two major ideas should be emphasized. The first is the necessity of considering the ecological components and processes behind landscapes, and the second is the role of the local population on rural landscape conservation.

AB - The present study analyzes the relationship between landscape multi-functionality and social preferences toward Mediterranean landscapes in terms of monetary and non-monetary techniques. Twenty landscape views were selected as representative of the landscape units characterizing Nacimiento and Adra semi-arid watersheds (southeastern Spain). Face-to-face questionnaires were used to assess social factors that influence willingness to pay for aesthetic landscape enjoyment (use value) and landscape conservation (non-use value). Meanwhile, an expert focus group analyzed the capacity of the selected semi-arid ecosystems for supplying services to society. The favorite landscape views mainly contained steeper reliefs, water flows, and traditional human activities. Our results suggest a strong positive effect between respondents' place attachment and the level of support for landscape conservation. Respondents were more willing to pay for the conservation of semi-arid rural landscapes when their sense of belonging was greater. We also found that multi-functional landscapes, which provide higher numbers of regulating and cultural services, were also preferred in terms of their visual quality (use value). Additionally, they had more social support for their conservation (non-use value). The conversion of multi-functional landscapes to mono-functional ones disturbs the stability of rural areas, their capacity to provide other ecosystem services, and the social support toward their preservation. To reverse this tendency, two major ideas should be emphasized. The first is the necessity of considering the ecological components and processes behind landscapes, and the second is the role of the local population on rural landscape conservation.

KW - Contingent valuation

KW - Expert focus group

KW - Landscape aesthetic

KW - Mediterranean

KW - Social-ecological system

KW - Value

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - contingent valuation

KW - Expert focus group

KW - Landscape aesthetic

KW - Mediterranean

KW - Social–ecological system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860607747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3a081322-c1de-36ad-a1cd-b408b67bc487/

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.006

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84860607747

VL - 19-20

SP - 136

EP - 146

JO - Environmental Science & Policy

JF - Environmental Science & Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -