The Influence of Political Engagement on Artistic Reputation. Self-Evaluations of Artists.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Influence of Political Engagement on Artistic Reputation. Self-Evaluations of Artists. / Kirchberg, Volker; Hoop, Marie; Kadar, Merav.
In: Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.08.2023, p. 29-58.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{0a74a37c8aee420cbea20dcb1b0e757c,
title = "The Influence of Political Engagement on Artistic Reputation. Self-Evaluations of Artists.",
abstract = "Despite the study of political art by many scholars, an in-depth analysis of how artistsexpress themselves politically and assess their political expression as part of their artistic reputation is still missing. How do artists value their political action in view of their artistic reputation, and why? A promising theoretical entry to this question is Pierre Bourdieu{\textquoteright}s field theory. We used his concept of field-specific symbolic capital in cultural production to study political expression by artists; findings are based on empirical research in the cities of Hamburg, Hanover, Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. In previous publications of this multistage research project, we identified five artist types that are involved in urban political action in different ways—the autonomous artist, social artivist, political artist, political artivist and high status artist. In this stage, we assess their political behavior as a factor of symbolic capital. We found that autonomous artists reject political action as detrimentalto their symbolic capital. High status artists have such a high artistic position that they can ignore any possible damage to their reputation caused by their political activities. Social artivists believe that overt political action might be harmful for their symbolic capital, and we label their political artistic action as social art. Political artists declare that their artwork is political, which promotes their symbolic capital as long as their political expressions are restricted to their artwork and not seen as personal expressions. Political artivists do not draw a line between their artwork and personal political expression, as they understand both as reputation enhancing. We thus reject the negative correlation between artistic autonomy and political heteronomy in the art field as simplistic.",
keywords = "Sociology, Kunstfeld, Feldtheorie, politischer Ausdruck, k{\"u}nstlerische Reputation, symbolisches Kapital, Art field, field theory, po{\"o}itical expressions, artistic reputation, symbolic capital, Cultural Distribution/Cultural Organization",
author = "Volker Kirchberg and Marie Hoop and Merav Kadar",
year = "2023",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.14361/zkmm-2023-0102",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "29--58",
journal = "Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy",
issn = "2701-8466",
publisher = "transcript Verlag",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Influence of Political Engagement on Artistic Reputation. Self-Evaluations of Artists.

AU - Kirchberg, Volker

AU - Hoop, Marie

AU - Kadar, Merav

PY - 2023/8/1

Y1 - 2023/8/1

N2 - Despite the study of political art by many scholars, an in-depth analysis of how artistsexpress themselves politically and assess their political expression as part of their artistic reputation is still missing. How do artists value their political action in view of their artistic reputation, and why? A promising theoretical entry to this question is Pierre Bourdieu’s field theory. We used his concept of field-specific symbolic capital in cultural production to study political expression by artists; findings are based on empirical research in the cities of Hamburg, Hanover, Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. In previous publications of this multistage research project, we identified five artist types that are involved in urban political action in different ways—the autonomous artist, social artivist, political artist, political artivist and high status artist. In this stage, we assess their political behavior as a factor of symbolic capital. We found that autonomous artists reject political action as detrimentalto their symbolic capital. High status artists have such a high artistic position that they can ignore any possible damage to their reputation caused by their political activities. Social artivists believe that overt political action might be harmful for their symbolic capital, and we label their political artistic action as social art. Political artists declare that their artwork is political, which promotes their symbolic capital as long as their political expressions are restricted to their artwork and not seen as personal expressions. Political artivists do not draw a line between their artwork and personal political expression, as they understand both as reputation enhancing. We thus reject the negative correlation between artistic autonomy and political heteronomy in the art field as simplistic.

AB - Despite the study of political art by many scholars, an in-depth analysis of how artistsexpress themselves politically and assess their political expression as part of their artistic reputation is still missing. How do artists value their political action in view of their artistic reputation, and why? A promising theoretical entry to this question is Pierre Bourdieu’s field theory. We used his concept of field-specific symbolic capital in cultural production to study political expression by artists; findings are based on empirical research in the cities of Hamburg, Hanover, Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. In previous publications of this multistage research project, we identified five artist types that are involved in urban political action in different ways—the autonomous artist, social artivist, political artist, political artivist and high status artist. In this stage, we assess their political behavior as a factor of symbolic capital. We found that autonomous artists reject political action as detrimentalto their symbolic capital. High status artists have such a high artistic position that they can ignore any possible damage to their reputation caused by their political activities. Social artivists believe that overt political action might be harmful for their symbolic capital, and we label their political artistic action as social art. Political artists declare that their artwork is political, which promotes their symbolic capital as long as their political expressions are restricted to their artwork and not seen as personal expressions. Political artivists do not draw a line between their artwork and personal political expression, as they understand both as reputation enhancing. We thus reject the negative correlation between artistic autonomy and political heteronomy in the art field as simplistic.

KW - Sociology

KW - Kunstfeld

KW - Feldtheorie

KW - politischer Ausdruck

KW - künstlerische Reputation

KW - symbolisches Kapital

KW - Art field

KW - field theory

KW - poöitical expressions

KW - artistic reputation

KW - symbolic capital

KW - Cultural Distribution/Cultural Organization

U2 - 10.14361/zkmm-2023-0102

DO - 10.14361/zkmm-2023-0102

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 9

SP - 29

EP - 58

JO - Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy

JF - Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy

SN - 2701-8466

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Kirsten Falk

Publications

  1. Oberstufe Religion NEU: Gott. Schülerheft
  2. Zur Transformation Sozialer Arbeit
  3. Ambidextrous leadership for innovation
  4. R&D and the agglomeration of industries
  5. Partnerships for Sustainable Business Development
  6. Removal of dexamethasone from aqueous solution and hospital wastewater by electrocoagulation
  7. Das ist anders als bei Längen
  8. Personalmanagement in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben
  9. Fate of airborne nitrogen in heathland ecosystems a - 15N tracer study
  10. Das parlamentarische Petitionswesen
  11. Corporate Volunteering als Instrument zur strategischen Implementierung von Corporate Social Responsibility
  12. The Internet as a Tool for Sustainability Accounting and Reporting?
  13. Climate change and society - communicating adaptation
  14. Microhardness and in vitro corrosion of heat-treated Mg-Y-Ag biodegradable alloy
  15. Different Subcultures in Residential Groups in Germany – Implications for Participation and the Victimization of Children and Young People
  16. Ecological quality as a coffee quality enhancer. A review
  17. Work-Time Control and Exhaustion
  18. Energiepolitik
  19. Knowledge retention at work and aging
  20. PopMusicology
  21. Reale Utopien
  22. Can rare arable plants benefit biological pest control potential of cereal aphids in croplands?
  23. Imagining the unimaginable
  24. Geteilte Sorge
  25. Mehr Gender-Strategie tut gut
  26. Choreographen der Gewalt
  27. Ideology
  28. International Investment Law and the Global Financial Architecture
  29. Optimal Harvest Licensing when Harvest Success is Uncertain
  30. Systematic student-driven literature reviews in sustainability science
  31. Ideological Construction of Deviance in Street Children’s Discourse in Southwestern Nigeria
  32. Vollendet
  33. Exports and productivity
  34. Bildungsstandards
  35. Sexual Difference or the Desire to Change It All
  36. Privatisierung im Gesundheitswesen
  37. Overcome procrastination
  38. Key competencies for sustainable consumption
  39. Scenarios for decarbonizing the European electricity sector
  40. Die Angst vor Migration. Gefühle als Modus politischen Denkens