The impact of genes, geography, and educational opportunities on national cognitive achievement
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Authors
A debate between Stankov and Lynn has focused on whether national differences in cognitive achievement are primarily a matter of culturally-driven motivation or genetically determined mental ability, measured in terms of IQ. We present evidence showing that a third position is more conclusive: while genetic differences are a driving force behind differences in academic achievement between nations, these genetic differences operate on motivation rather than ability. Indeed, across 53 countries from all continents, 90% of the variance in national cognitive achievement can be explained by: (1) a recently reported national genetic index related to life history strategy; (2) educational opportunities as measured by the education index of the United Nations Development Program, and (3) a geographic variable: Welzel's index for cool water condition. In contrast, neither national wealth (gross domestic product per person), nor socioeconomic inequality (Gini index), nor pathogen prevalence show a significant effect. We explain these findings by combining theoretical propositions about academic achievement from two complementary approaches: life history strategy and the cool water condition.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Learning and Individual Differences |
Volume | 47 |
Pages (from-to) | 236-243 |
Number of pages | 8 |
ISSN | 1041-6080 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01.04.2016 |
- Geography
- Biology - Genes
- Economics, empirical/statistics - Life history strategy, Cool water theory, Cognitive achievement
- Politics
- Cognitive achievement, Cool water theory, Genes, Life history strategy