The Culture of Cities: Measuring Perceived Cosmopolitanism

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Culture of Cities : Measuring Perceived Cosmopolitanism. / Sevincer, A. Timur; Varnum, Michael E.W.; Kitayama, Shinobu.

In: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 48, No. 7, 01.08.2017, p. 1052-1072.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sevincer AT, Varnum MEW, Kitayama S. The Culture of Cities: Measuring Perceived Cosmopolitanism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2017 Aug 1;48(7):1052-1072. doi: 10.1177/0022022117717030

Bibtex

@article{e39e28d02b234774a4476e2ec911714b,
title = "The Culture of Cities: Measuring Perceived Cosmopolitanism",
abstract = "Cities like New York and San Francisco have a different feel than cities like Newark and Columbus. But can these differences be captured quantitatively? We argue these places vary along the dimension of cosmopolitanism, that is, the extent to which they offer economic opportunities and emphasize diversity, creativity, and egalitarianism. We present a Cosmopolitan City Scale (CCS) designed to assess perceived cosmopolitanism. The CCS has high internal reliability and correlates with objective indicators of cosmopolitanism such as intergenerational mobility and number of patents generated (Study 1). Consistent with the notion that people with an independent orientation migrate to cosmopolitan places, independence was associated with preference for cosmopolitan cities as measured by our scale (Study 2). High openness to experience, high extraversion, liberalism, high socioeconomic status, and single marital status were also related to greater preference for cosmopolitan cities. We believe the CCS provides a new tool for understanding how cities differ and helps clarify factors that drive migration preferences. We also discuss implications of cosmopolitanism for cultural processes such as acculturation and intergroup relations.",
keywords = "Big Five personality dimensions, cosmopolitanism, independence, residential preferences, voluntary settlement, Psychology",
author = "Sevincer, {A. Timur} and Varnum, {Michael E.W.} and Shinobu Kitayama",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2017.",
year = "2017",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022022117717030",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "1052--1072",
journal = "Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology",
issn = "0022-0221",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Culture of Cities

T2 - Measuring Perceived Cosmopolitanism

AU - Sevincer, A. Timur

AU - Varnum, Michael E.W.

AU - Kitayama, Shinobu

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Cities like New York and San Francisco have a different feel than cities like Newark and Columbus. But can these differences be captured quantitatively? We argue these places vary along the dimension of cosmopolitanism, that is, the extent to which they offer economic opportunities and emphasize diversity, creativity, and egalitarianism. We present a Cosmopolitan City Scale (CCS) designed to assess perceived cosmopolitanism. The CCS has high internal reliability and correlates with objective indicators of cosmopolitanism such as intergenerational mobility and number of patents generated (Study 1). Consistent with the notion that people with an independent orientation migrate to cosmopolitan places, independence was associated with preference for cosmopolitan cities as measured by our scale (Study 2). High openness to experience, high extraversion, liberalism, high socioeconomic status, and single marital status were also related to greater preference for cosmopolitan cities. We believe the CCS provides a new tool for understanding how cities differ and helps clarify factors that drive migration preferences. We also discuss implications of cosmopolitanism for cultural processes such as acculturation and intergroup relations.

AB - Cities like New York and San Francisco have a different feel than cities like Newark and Columbus. But can these differences be captured quantitatively? We argue these places vary along the dimension of cosmopolitanism, that is, the extent to which they offer economic opportunities and emphasize diversity, creativity, and egalitarianism. We present a Cosmopolitan City Scale (CCS) designed to assess perceived cosmopolitanism. The CCS has high internal reliability and correlates with objective indicators of cosmopolitanism such as intergenerational mobility and number of patents generated (Study 1). Consistent with the notion that people with an independent orientation migrate to cosmopolitan places, independence was associated with preference for cosmopolitan cities as measured by our scale (Study 2). High openness to experience, high extraversion, liberalism, high socioeconomic status, and single marital status were also related to greater preference for cosmopolitan cities. We believe the CCS provides a new tool for understanding how cities differ and helps clarify factors that drive migration preferences. We also discuss implications of cosmopolitanism for cultural processes such as acculturation and intergroup relations.

KW - Big Five personality dimensions

KW - cosmopolitanism

KW - independence

KW - residential preferences

KW - voluntary settlement

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025118671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022022117717030

DO - 10.1177/0022022117717030

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85025118671

VL - 48

SP - 1052

EP - 1072

JO - Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

JF - Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

SN - 0022-0221

IS - 7

ER -

DOI