Taking Responsibility for Others and Use of Mental Contrasting

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Taking Responsibility for Others and Use of Mental Contrasting. / Sevincer, A. Timur; Musik, Tanja; Degener, Alina et al.
In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 46, No. 8, 01.08.2020, p. 1219-1233.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sevincer AT, Musik T, Degener A, Greinert A, Oettingen G. Taking Responsibility for Others and Use of Mental Contrasting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2020 Aug 1;46(8):1219-1233. doi: 10.1177/0146167219898569

Bibtex

@article{6414d45712e346b58edfb9855de88e5f,
title = "Taking Responsibility for Others and Use of Mental Contrasting",
abstract = "Mentally contrasting a desired future with present reality fosters selective goal pursuit: People pursue feasible desired futures and let go from unfeasible ones. We investigated whether people are more inclined to spontaneously use mental contrasting when they feel responsibility. Studies 1 and 2 provided correlational evidence: Employees who felt responsible for completing an important team project (Study 1) and MTurk users who felt and actively took social responsibility (Study 2) were more inclined to use mental contrasting. Studies 3 and 4 added experimental evidence: Students who were instructed to imagine responsibility for giving an excellent class presentation in a group or alone (Study 3) and participants who elaborated on an idiosyncratic wish that involved responsibility for others or themselves tended to use mental contrasting (Study 4). Apparently, people who feel or take responsibility for others, the society, or themselves are more likely to use mental contrasting as a self-regulation tool.",
keywords = "content-analyses, future thinking, mental contrasting, responsibility, self-regulation, Psychology",
author = "Sevincer, {A. Timur} and Tanja Musik and Alina Degener and Annika Greinert and Gabriele Oettingen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0146167219898569",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "1219--1233",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking Responsibility for Others and Use of Mental Contrasting

AU - Sevincer, A. Timur

AU - Musik, Tanja

AU - Degener, Alina

AU - Greinert, Annika

AU - Oettingen, Gabriele

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

PY - 2020/8/1

Y1 - 2020/8/1

N2 - Mentally contrasting a desired future with present reality fosters selective goal pursuit: People pursue feasible desired futures and let go from unfeasible ones. We investigated whether people are more inclined to spontaneously use mental contrasting when they feel responsibility. Studies 1 and 2 provided correlational evidence: Employees who felt responsible for completing an important team project (Study 1) and MTurk users who felt and actively took social responsibility (Study 2) were more inclined to use mental contrasting. Studies 3 and 4 added experimental evidence: Students who were instructed to imagine responsibility for giving an excellent class presentation in a group or alone (Study 3) and participants who elaborated on an idiosyncratic wish that involved responsibility for others or themselves tended to use mental contrasting (Study 4). Apparently, people who feel or take responsibility for others, the society, or themselves are more likely to use mental contrasting as a self-regulation tool.

AB - Mentally contrasting a desired future with present reality fosters selective goal pursuit: People pursue feasible desired futures and let go from unfeasible ones. We investigated whether people are more inclined to spontaneously use mental contrasting when they feel responsibility. Studies 1 and 2 provided correlational evidence: Employees who felt responsible for completing an important team project (Study 1) and MTurk users who felt and actively took social responsibility (Study 2) were more inclined to use mental contrasting. Studies 3 and 4 added experimental evidence: Students who were instructed to imagine responsibility for giving an excellent class presentation in a group or alone (Study 3) and participants who elaborated on an idiosyncratic wish that involved responsibility for others or themselves tended to use mental contrasting (Study 4). Apparently, people who feel or take responsibility for others, the society, or themselves are more likely to use mental contrasting as a self-regulation tool.

KW - content-analyses

KW - future thinking

KW - mental contrasting

KW - responsibility

KW - self-regulation

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078286644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167219898569

DO - 10.1177/0146167219898569

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 31928315

AN - SCOPUS:85078286644

VL - 46

SP - 1219

EP - 1233

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 8

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. "Lob des Unscheinbaren"
  2. Sensitive, simultaneous determination of P, S, Cl, Br and I containing pesticides in environmental samples by GC hyphenated with collision-cell ICP-MS
  3. Personal need for structure as a boundary condition for humor in leadership
  4. Key landscape features in the provision of ecosystem services
  5. Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services
  6. Interkulturelle Differenzen im Selbstkonzept von Managern
  7. Crowdsourcing Hypothesis Tests
  8. Strategies to Induce Non-cooperating Countries to Join a Climate-policy Coalition
  9. Die WTO
  10. Konzeptionsentwicklung – eine Einführung
  11. Vicki Baum und Gina Kaus
  12. Corporate Social Responsibility in Innovation: Insights from two Cases of Syngenta's Activities in Genetically Modified Organisms
  13. Rechtskonformität
  14. § 44 VwGO (Objektive Klagehäufung)
  15. § 395: Verschwiegensheitspflicht
  16. The moderating role of experience on the relationship between trust and performance of cooperating SMEs in transformation economies
  17. Educating sustainability change agents by design
  18. “They Are Stumbling Around Quite Helplessly”: How Supporters of Refugee Families Frame Vulnerability and Agency Relating to Childcare
  19. Patient-reported outcomes in rehabilitation research
  20. Diagramme aus der Zeitung
  21. Itineraria Picta: Itineraria Scripta
  22. Kommentierung zu Art. 221 AEUV
  23. Trade liberalization and the global expansion of modern taxes
  24. Just what are temperate and boreal rainforests?
  25. Neue Rechte und Unversität
  26. Methoden-Muster: Elternselbstorganisation und -selbstverwaltung
  27. Differential effect of grassland mowing on arthropod taxa
  28. Industrielle Arbeitsbedingungen
  29. Was zählt die Stimme einer Lehrkraft ?
  30. Nitrogen deposition and drought events have non-additive effects on plant growth – Evidence from greenhouse experiments
  31. Beyond budgeting