Taking Responsibility for Others and Use of Mental Contrasting

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Taking Responsibility for Others and Use of Mental Contrasting. / Sevincer, A. Timur; Musik, Tanja; Degener, Alina et al.
in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Jahrgang 46, Nr. 8, 01.08.2020, S. 1219-1233.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sevincer AT, Musik T, Degener A, Greinert A, Oettingen G. Taking Responsibility for Others and Use of Mental Contrasting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2020 Aug 1;46(8):1219-1233. doi: 10.1177/0146167219898569

Bibtex

@article{6414d45712e346b58edfb9855de88e5f,
title = "Taking Responsibility for Others and Use of Mental Contrasting",
abstract = "Mentally contrasting a desired future with present reality fosters selective goal pursuit: People pursue feasible desired futures and let go from unfeasible ones. We investigated whether people are more inclined to spontaneously use mental contrasting when they feel responsibility. Studies 1 and 2 provided correlational evidence: Employees who felt responsible for completing an important team project (Study 1) and MTurk users who felt and actively took social responsibility (Study 2) were more inclined to use mental contrasting. Studies 3 and 4 added experimental evidence: Students who were instructed to imagine responsibility for giving an excellent class presentation in a group or alone (Study 3) and participants who elaborated on an idiosyncratic wish that involved responsibility for others or themselves tended to use mental contrasting (Study 4). Apparently, people who feel or take responsibility for others, the society, or themselves are more likely to use mental contrasting as a self-regulation tool.",
keywords = "content-analyses, future thinking, mental contrasting, responsibility, self-regulation, Psychology",
author = "Sevincer, {A. Timur} and Tanja Musik and Alina Degener and Annika Greinert and Gabriele Oettingen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0146167219898569",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "1219--1233",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking Responsibility for Others and Use of Mental Contrasting

AU - Sevincer, A. Timur

AU - Musik, Tanja

AU - Degener, Alina

AU - Greinert, Annika

AU - Oettingen, Gabriele

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

PY - 2020/8/1

Y1 - 2020/8/1

N2 - Mentally contrasting a desired future with present reality fosters selective goal pursuit: People pursue feasible desired futures and let go from unfeasible ones. We investigated whether people are more inclined to spontaneously use mental contrasting when they feel responsibility. Studies 1 and 2 provided correlational evidence: Employees who felt responsible for completing an important team project (Study 1) and MTurk users who felt and actively took social responsibility (Study 2) were more inclined to use mental contrasting. Studies 3 and 4 added experimental evidence: Students who were instructed to imagine responsibility for giving an excellent class presentation in a group or alone (Study 3) and participants who elaborated on an idiosyncratic wish that involved responsibility for others or themselves tended to use mental contrasting (Study 4). Apparently, people who feel or take responsibility for others, the society, or themselves are more likely to use mental contrasting as a self-regulation tool.

AB - Mentally contrasting a desired future with present reality fosters selective goal pursuit: People pursue feasible desired futures and let go from unfeasible ones. We investigated whether people are more inclined to spontaneously use mental contrasting when they feel responsibility. Studies 1 and 2 provided correlational evidence: Employees who felt responsible for completing an important team project (Study 1) and MTurk users who felt and actively took social responsibility (Study 2) were more inclined to use mental contrasting. Studies 3 and 4 added experimental evidence: Students who were instructed to imagine responsibility for giving an excellent class presentation in a group or alone (Study 3) and participants who elaborated on an idiosyncratic wish that involved responsibility for others or themselves tended to use mental contrasting (Study 4). Apparently, people who feel or take responsibility for others, the society, or themselves are more likely to use mental contrasting as a self-regulation tool.

KW - content-analyses

KW - future thinking

KW - mental contrasting

KW - responsibility

KW - self-regulation

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078286644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167219898569

DO - 10.1177/0146167219898569

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 31928315

AN - SCOPUS:85078286644

VL - 46

SP - 1219

EP - 1233

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 8

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Socio-economic analysis for the authorisation of chemicals under REACH
  2. Price Gouging at the Pump? The Lerner Index and the German Fuel Market
  3. Partizipation von Leistungserbringern - Eine mikroökonomische Analyse
  4. Oxidation Kinetics of Neat Methyl Oleate and as a Blend with Solketal
  5. Grundsatzfragen und Paradoxien für die Netzwerkarbeit in BBS futur 2.0
  6. Fallstudie 1: Die Inhaberschuldverschreibung von Hamburg Energie Solar
  7. Exports and productivity: A survey of the evidence from firm-level data
  8. Eine Schulleistungsstudie der IEA und ihre internationale Erweiterung
  9. Die Behandlung belasteter Grundstücke in der Handels- und Steuerbilanz
  10. Cultural influences on social feedback processing of character traits
  11. CALPHAD-based modeling of pressure-dependent Al, Cu and Li unary systems
  12. Are economically significant bond returns explained by corporate news?
  13. Accounting for corporate environmental rebounds. A conceptual approach
  14. What determines PCB concentrations in soils in rural and urban areas?
  15.  Visiting communities of extrafloral nectaries in a subtropical Chinese forest 
  16. Spray-dried chitosan-metal microparticles for ciprofloxacin adsorption
  17. Settingbezogene Prävention von Übergewicht im Kindes- und Jugendalter
  18. Sensory Perception of Non-Deuterated and Deuterated Organic Compounds
  19. Professionalisierung in der performativ-künstlerischen Bildungsarbeit
  20. Party Systems and Government Stability in Central and Eastern Europe
  21. Netzwerkgestütztes kooperatives Selbstlernen berufsbildender Schulen
  22. Marketable and non-hedgeable risk in a duopoly framework with hedging
  23. Logistical futures the chinese dream, debordering labor, and migration
  24. Leuphana startet Wissenstransfer für unternehmerische Nachhaltigkeit
  25. It Is Belief in Dualism, and Not Free Will, That Best Predicts Helping: A Conceptual Replication and Extension of Baumeister et al. (2009)
  26. Kriterien und Effekte von digitalen Medien in inklusiven Lerngruppen
  27. Hygieneanforderungen für handwerklich strukturierte Schlachtbetriebe
  28. Fragile Evidenz: Datenprobleme in der Risikobewertung für Chemikalien
  29. Entrepreneurship in conventions, place-making, and spaces of creativity
  30. Empirical Studies with Micro-Data from Official Statistics in Germany
  31. Emotionsregulation und Problemverhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen
  32. Einleitung: Blumers Rebellion 2.0: Eine Wissenschaft der Interpretation
  33. Determinants in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing Decisions—A Cross-Country Study
  34. Biodegradability of organic nanoparticles in the aqueous environment
  35. Deficits in EU and US mandatory environmental information disclosure
  36. Between joint project, institutional bargaining and symbolic politics
  37. A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation