Sustainability Transitions and the Spatial Interface: Developing Conceptual Perspectives

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Sustainability transitions research lacks a crucial perspective: the spatial dimension. The interrelations between space and sustainability transition processes are thus underexposed. The spatial dimension is, of course, implicitly addressed in transition research but it often remains unclear which spatial concept is used and how the spatial conditions are embedded in the transition processes. This paper approaches the problem in two steps: (1) analysing the various understandings of transitions research and their implications for different spatial concepts relating to spatial sustainability transition; and (2) focusing on different spatial concepts (from a positivist mode to relational and socio-cultural approaches) and their reflections in different disciplines of social, natural and technical sciences as well as in practice. By identifying the links between sustainable transition approaches on the one hand and spatial conceptualizations on the other hand, this paper aims at deepening both the spatial perspective and the understanding of sustainable transition research. The results of this paper are three conceptual perspectives wherein space or spatial conceptualizations can provide added value for sustainability transition research in inter- and transdisciplinary modes. These three perspectives include (1) space as a “bridging concept,” (2) space as a “normative concept,” and (3) space as an “approach to action.”
Original languageEnglish
Article number1880
JournalSustainability
Volume10
Issue number6
Number of pages15
ISSN2071-1050
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 05.06.2018

Bibliographical note

The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access Fund of the Leibniz Universität Hannover.

    Research areas

  • Environmental planning - sustainability, physical space, socio-cultural space, relational space, inter- and transdisciplinarity, concetptual perspectives

Documents

DOI