Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 11, 561388, 24.11.2020.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups
T2 - Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for
AU - Thürmer, J. Lukas
AU - Wieber, Frank
AU - Gollwitzer, Peter M.
N1 - This research was supported by the University of Konstanz YSF and AFF funding schemes.
PY - 2020/11/24
Y1 - 2020/11/24
N2 - Groups need contributions that are personally costly to their members. Such cooperation is only adaptive when others cooperate as well, as unconditional cooperation may incur high costs to the individual. We argue that individuals can use We-if-then plans (collective implementation intentions, cIIs) to regulate their group-directed behavior strategically, helping them to cooperate selectively with group members in the situation planned for. In line with this prediction, a cII to consider group earnings increased cooperative decisions in a prisoners’ dilemma game when playing against another group member but not when playing against a stranger (i.e., non-group member). Moreover, cIIs to cooperate in the prisoners’ dilemma game did not increase cooperation in a structurally similar investment game that participants had not planned for. We discuss the role of collective planning in solving social dilemmas.
AB - Groups need contributions that are personally costly to their members. Such cooperation is only adaptive when others cooperate as well, as unconditional cooperation may incur high costs to the individual. We argue that individuals can use We-if-then plans (collective implementation intentions, cIIs) to regulate their group-directed behavior strategically, helping them to cooperate selectively with group members in the situation planned for. In line with this prediction, a cII to consider group earnings increased cooperative decisions in a prisoners’ dilemma game when playing against another group member but not when playing against a stranger (i.e., non-group member). Moreover, cIIs to cooperate in the prisoners’ dilemma game did not increase cooperation in a structurally similar investment game that participants had not planned for. We discuss the role of collective planning in solving social dilemmas.
KW - collective implementation intentions
KW - cooperation
KW - motivation science
KW - prisoners’ dilemma
KW - self-regulation
KW - small group performance
KW - Psychology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096867747&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 33329189
AN - SCOPUS:85096867747
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
SN - 1664-1078
M1 - 561388
ER -