Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for. / Thürmer, J. Lukas; Wieber, Frank; Gollwitzer, Peter M.
In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 11, 561388, 24.11.2020.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Thürmer JL, Wieber F, Gollwitzer PM. Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020 Nov 24;11:561388. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388

Bibtex

@article{5c8b2e5d7ae949aaa8b8d27ec033d788,
title = "Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for",
abstract = "Groups need contributions that are personally costly to their members. Such cooperation is only adaptive when others cooperate as well, as unconditional cooperation may incur high costs to the individual. We argue that individuals can use We-if-then plans (collective implementation intentions, cIIs) to regulate their group-directed behavior strategically, helping them to cooperate selectively with group members in the situation planned for. In line with this prediction, a cII to consider group earnings increased cooperative decisions in a prisoners{\textquoteright} dilemma game when playing against another group member but not when playing against a stranger (i.e., non-group member). Moreover, cIIs to cooperate in the prisoners{\textquoteright} dilemma game did not increase cooperation in a structurally similar investment game that participants had not planned for. We discuss the role of collective planning in solving social dilemmas.",
keywords = "collective implementation intentions, cooperation, motivation science, prisoners{\textquoteright} dilemma, self-regulation, small group performance, Psychology",
author = "Th{\"u}rmer, {J. Lukas} and Frank Wieber and Gollwitzer, {Peter M.}",
note = "This research was supported by the University of Konstanz YSF and AFF funding schemes.",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "24",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media SA",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups

T2 - Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for

AU - Thürmer, J. Lukas

AU - Wieber, Frank

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter M.

N1 - This research was supported by the University of Konstanz YSF and AFF funding schemes.

PY - 2020/11/24

Y1 - 2020/11/24

N2 - Groups need contributions that are personally costly to their members. Such cooperation is only adaptive when others cooperate as well, as unconditional cooperation may incur high costs to the individual. We argue that individuals can use We-if-then plans (collective implementation intentions, cIIs) to regulate their group-directed behavior strategically, helping them to cooperate selectively with group members in the situation planned for. In line with this prediction, a cII to consider group earnings increased cooperative decisions in a prisoners’ dilemma game when playing against another group member but not when playing against a stranger (i.e., non-group member). Moreover, cIIs to cooperate in the prisoners’ dilemma game did not increase cooperation in a structurally similar investment game that participants had not planned for. We discuss the role of collective planning in solving social dilemmas.

AB - Groups need contributions that are personally costly to their members. Such cooperation is only adaptive when others cooperate as well, as unconditional cooperation may incur high costs to the individual. We argue that individuals can use We-if-then plans (collective implementation intentions, cIIs) to regulate their group-directed behavior strategically, helping them to cooperate selectively with group members in the situation planned for. In line with this prediction, a cII to consider group earnings increased cooperative decisions in a prisoners’ dilemma game when playing against another group member but not when playing against a stranger (i.e., non-group member). Moreover, cIIs to cooperate in the prisoners’ dilemma game did not increase cooperation in a structurally similar investment game that participants had not planned for. We discuss the role of collective planning in solving social dilemmas.

KW - collective implementation intentions

KW - cooperation

KW - motivation science

KW - prisoners’ dilemma

KW - self-regulation

KW - small group performance

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096867747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 33329189

AN - SCOPUS:85096867747

VL - 11

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 561388

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Elections in Asia and the Pacific: a data handbook
  2. What do we know about Antibiotics in the Environment?
  3. Initiative in work teams
  4. Existenzgründung 1
  5. CSR management and reporting between voluntary bonding and legal regulation
  6. The overburdened mother: How social workers view the private sphere
  7. Interdisciplinary engineering education in the context of digitalization and global transformation prozesses.
  8. Activity-based start-up simulations in entrepreneurship education at German universities
  9. Spatial scale affects seed predation and dispersal in contrasting anthropogenic landscapes
  10. Armenia
  11. Pervasive Intelligence
  12. Impulse für die Migrationsgesellschaft
  13. Public Value
  14. User participation in the quality assurance of requirements specifications
  15. Modelling of heat exchangers based on thermochemical material for solar heat storage systems
  16. Die Unterwerfung
  17. Ecosystem services and distributive justice. Considering access rights to ecosystem services in theories of distributive justice
  18. Metacommunity, mainland-island system or island communities?
  19. Fallstudie
  20. Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups
  21. Does CEO power moderate the link between ESG performance and financial performance?
  22. Control and Freedom: Power and Paranoia in the Age of Fiber Optics
  23. Exploring the influence of testimonial source on attitudes towards e-mental health interventions among university students
  24. Heidegger und die Römer
  25. Computer Simulations Then and Now
  26. Transcending adaptation
  27. Werturteil II
  28. Globalization, Nautical Nostalgia and Maritime Identity Politics. A Case Study on Boundary Objects in the Future German Port Museum
  29. The Three Schools of CCO Thinking
  30. Der extrovertierte Rechtstaat
  31. Article 73 CISG
  32. It´s All in the Game!