Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for. / Thürmer, J. Lukas; Wieber, Frank; Gollwitzer, Peter M.
In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 11, 561388, 24.11.2020.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Thürmer JL, Wieber F, Gollwitzer PM. Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020 Nov 24;11:561388. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388

Bibtex

@article{5c8b2e5d7ae949aaa8b8d27ec033d788,
title = "Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for",
abstract = "Groups need contributions that are personally costly to their members. Such cooperation is only adaptive when others cooperate as well, as unconditional cooperation may incur high costs to the individual. We argue that individuals can use We-if-then plans (collective implementation intentions, cIIs) to regulate their group-directed behavior strategically, helping them to cooperate selectively with group members in the situation planned for. In line with this prediction, a cII to consider group earnings increased cooperative decisions in a prisoners{\textquoteright} dilemma game when playing against another group member but not when playing against a stranger (i.e., non-group member). Moreover, cIIs to cooperate in the prisoners{\textquoteright} dilemma game did not increase cooperation in a structurally similar investment game that participants had not planned for. We discuss the role of collective planning in solving social dilemmas.",
keywords = "collective implementation intentions, cooperation, motivation science, prisoners{\textquoteright} dilemma, self-regulation, small group performance, Psychology",
author = "Th{\"u}rmer, {J. Lukas} and Frank Wieber and Gollwitzer, {Peter M.}",
note = "This research was supported by the University of Konstanz YSF and AFF funding schemes.",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "24",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media SA",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups

T2 - Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for

AU - Thürmer, J. Lukas

AU - Wieber, Frank

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter M.

N1 - This research was supported by the University of Konstanz YSF and AFF funding schemes.

PY - 2020/11/24

Y1 - 2020/11/24

N2 - Groups need contributions that are personally costly to their members. Such cooperation is only adaptive when others cooperate as well, as unconditional cooperation may incur high costs to the individual. We argue that individuals can use We-if-then plans (collective implementation intentions, cIIs) to regulate their group-directed behavior strategically, helping them to cooperate selectively with group members in the situation planned for. In line with this prediction, a cII to consider group earnings increased cooperative decisions in a prisoners’ dilemma game when playing against another group member but not when playing against a stranger (i.e., non-group member). Moreover, cIIs to cooperate in the prisoners’ dilemma game did not increase cooperation in a structurally similar investment game that participants had not planned for. We discuss the role of collective planning in solving social dilemmas.

AB - Groups need contributions that are personally costly to their members. Such cooperation is only adaptive when others cooperate as well, as unconditional cooperation may incur high costs to the individual. We argue that individuals can use We-if-then plans (collective implementation intentions, cIIs) to regulate their group-directed behavior strategically, helping them to cooperate selectively with group members in the situation planned for. In line with this prediction, a cII to consider group earnings increased cooperative decisions in a prisoners’ dilemma game when playing against another group member but not when playing against a stranger (i.e., non-group member). Moreover, cIIs to cooperate in the prisoners’ dilemma game did not increase cooperation in a structurally similar investment game that participants had not planned for. We discuss the role of collective planning in solving social dilemmas.

KW - collective implementation intentions

KW - cooperation

KW - motivation science

KW - prisoners’ dilemma

KW - self-regulation

KW - small group performance

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096867747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 33329189

AN - SCOPUS:85096867747

VL - 11

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 561388

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Does a smile open all doors? Understanding the impact of appearance disclosure on accommodation sharing platforms
  2. Christine Helmer: The trinity and Martin Luther
  3. Symbol Systems as Cognitive and Performative Hybrids
  4. We have Some Calves left! Socially Accepted Alternatives to the Current Handling of Male Calves from Dairy Production
  5. Protest 2.0 - Don't believe the Hype
  6. Der Markenwert
  7. A framework for disentangling ecological mechanisms underlying the island species–area relationship
  8. §50 Windenergie auf See
  9. Towards space traffic management
  10. Influence of cerium on stress corrosion cracking in AZ91D
  11. Kleinknecht, Alfred and Bain, Donald (eds.): New concepts in innovation output measurement, Basingstoke/London: Macmillan, 1993.204 pp. f 45.00. ISBN 0-333-58818-5
  12. Off-stage ecosystem service burdens
  13. Error Training
  14. Comparative Study of AC-DC Rectifiers for Vibration Energy Harvesters
  15. The Whiteness of Wealth Management
  16. Report on the First CELIS NOW Conference ‘The Age of Open Strategic Autonomy’
  17. Verschlafener Medienwandel
  18. Lesekompetenz heute
  19. „Der ganze Landkreis komplett in Aufruhr“
  20. Entwicklung und Qualitätssicherung von Anwendungssoftware
  21. Die Kolonialisierung der Vergangenheit
  22. The overburdened mother: How social workers view the private sphere
  23. After Occupy
  24. Loan managers’ trust and credit access for SMEs
  25. Roboter aus dem Silikondrucker
  26. Web-Based and Mobile Stress Management Intervention for Employees
  27. The Altmark Trans judgment: consequences for the hospital sector
  28. Staat und Gewissen. Ein Beitrag zum Grundrecht auf Kriegsdienstverweigerung
  29. Sustainability assessments designed for multiple functions
  30. Proletarische und bürgerliche Jünglinge in der Moderne
  31. Doing Gender – Doing Space – Doing Body
  32. Determinants in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing Decisions—A Cross-Country Study