Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for. / Thürmer, J. Lukas; Wieber, Frank; Gollwitzer, Peter M.
in: Frontiers in Psychology, Jahrgang 11, 561388, 24.11.2020.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Thürmer JL, Wieber F, Gollwitzer PM. Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020 Nov 24;11:561388. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388

Bibtex

@article{5c8b2e5d7ae949aaa8b8d27ec033d788,
title = "Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for",
abstract = "Groups need contributions that are personally costly to their members. Such cooperation is only adaptive when others cooperate as well, as unconditional cooperation may incur high costs to the individual. We argue that individuals can use We-if-then plans (collective implementation intentions, cIIs) to regulate their group-directed behavior strategically, helping them to cooperate selectively with group members in the situation planned for. In line with this prediction, a cII to consider group earnings increased cooperative decisions in a prisoners{\textquoteright} dilemma game when playing against another group member but not when playing against a stranger (i.e., non-group member). Moreover, cIIs to cooperate in the prisoners{\textquoteright} dilemma game did not increase cooperation in a structurally similar investment game that participants had not planned for. We discuss the role of collective planning in solving social dilemmas.",
keywords = "collective implementation intentions, cooperation, motivation science, prisoners{\textquoteright} dilemma, self-regulation, small group performance, Psychology",
author = "Th{\"u}rmer, {J. Lukas} and Frank Wieber and Gollwitzer, {Peter M.}",
note = "This research was supported by the University of Konstanz YSF and AFF funding schemes.",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "24",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media SA",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups

T2 - Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for

AU - Thürmer, J. Lukas

AU - Wieber, Frank

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter M.

N1 - This research was supported by the University of Konstanz YSF and AFF funding schemes.

PY - 2020/11/24

Y1 - 2020/11/24

N2 - Groups need contributions that are personally costly to their members. Such cooperation is only adaptive when others cooperate as well, as unconditional cooperation may incur high costs to the individual. We argue that individuals can use We-if-then plans (collective implementation intentions, cIIs) to regulate their group-directed behavior strategically, helping them to cooperate selectively with group members in the situation planned for. In line with this prediction, a cII to consider group earnings increased cooperative decisions in a prisoners’ dilemma game when playing against another group member but not when playing against a stranger (i.e., non-group member). Moreover, cIIs to cooperate in the prisoners’ dilemma game did not increase cooperation in a structurally similar investment game that participants had not planned for. We discuss the role of collective planning in solving social dilemmas.

AB - Groups need contributions that are personally costly to their members. Such cooperation is only adaptive when others cooperate as well, as unconditional cooperation may incur high costs to the individual. We argue that individuals can use We-if-then plans (collective implementation intentions, cIIs) to regulate their group-directed behavior strategically, helping them to cooperate selectively with group members in the situation planned for. In line with this prediction, a cII to consider group earnings increased cooperative decisions in a prisoners’ dilemma game when playing against another group member but not when playing against a stranger (i.e., non-group member). Moreover, cIIs to cooperate in the prisoners’ dilemma game did not increase cooperation in a structurally similar investment game that participants had not planned for. We discuss the role of collective planning in solving social dilemmas.

KW - collective implementation intentions

KW - cooperation

KW - motivation science

KW - prisoners’ dilemma

KW - self-regulation

KW - small group performance

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096867747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 33329189

AN - SCOPUS:85096867747

VL - 11

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 561388

ER -

Dokumente

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Peer Victimization, Self-Concept, and Grades
  2. Markenbewertung als Controllinginstrument
  3. ZP-Stichwort: Percentage-of-Completion-Methode
  4. Selbstreflexion und familienkommunikation
  5. Von der Hörerpost zur Publikumsstatistik
  6. Nachfrageorientierte Bewertung von Marken
  7. Psychologischer Vertrag und Sozialisation
  8. ephemera: theory & politics in organization
  9. Participation in environmental governance
  10. Kulturelle Funktionen der Science Fiction
  11. The digital disruption of strategic paths
  12. Mapping the European Space of Circulation
  13. Wahrnehmungseffiziente Managementberichte
  14. Die Einführung einer Entfernungspauschale
  15. Dichteprognose autoregressiver Zeitreihen
  16. Strategiegetriebene, adaptive Budgetierung
  17. § 3 Grundzüge des materiellen Kartellrechts
  18. 43° Congresso mundial de química (iupac 2011)
  19. Tourenplanung bei verbundener Distribution
  20. Effektivität und Effizienz durch Netzwerke
  21. Hot rolling and deep drawing of AM50 sheet
  22. System change at National government level
  23. Das Staatsverständnis von Nicos Poulantzas
  24. Innovative hybrid process in metal forming
  25. New directions in organizational behaviour?
  26. Protecting molten magnesium and its alloys
  27. Überwindung von Hochschul- und Fachkulturen!?
  28. Productivity and size of the export market
  29. Politikberatung in der Wissensgesellschaft
  30. Business ethics and management development
  31. EU Democracy Promotion in the Mediterranean
  32. Gender Impact Assessment und Gender Budgets
  33. Marktorientierte Planung des Produktsystems
  34. Territory and electoral politics in Germany
  35. Lehrerqualität zwischen Kompetenz und Ethos
  36. Menschenrechtspädagogik - eine Arbeitstagung
  37. Solid solution strengthening in Mg-Gd alloys
  38. Eigenschaften von kaltumgeformten Bauteilen
  39. Bachelor Betriebswirtschaftslehre im Wandel
  40. Migrationskontrolle durch Flüchtlingsschutz?
  41. Multikausalität in der Entscheidungstheorie
  42. The policy turn in German political science
  43. Communicative Constitution of Organizations
  44. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy